Yesterday I watched Shallow Hal again.
Yes, it has to be among the most insensitive movies ever made. But to be honest, I found it wickedly funny, except for the mushy feel-good end.
I know it’s politically incorrect to laugh at fat people, I know “beauty is only skin-deep” and all those politically correct things people say to make ugly people feel good! He he! Awrite, I was kidding! Seriously, I was kidding and you know I’m kidding cuz I am not like a Greek God myself (Er… ummm… actually I could be… if you gimme a few weeks … a little working out at the gym should do the trick. Or gimme a few minutes, a little working on PhotoShop could do it too).
But the point here is that I don’t think one should feel bad about saying politically incorrect things as long as it’s just said for the sake of humour. I mean the world will be such a boring place to live in if no one ever took a dig!
The problem I had with Shallow Hall is the politically correct ending. Hal finally ends up with that incredibly obese woman who he thought was like the slim and slender Gwyneth Paltrow!
Throughout the movie, the Farelly brothers make fun of fat and aesthetically challenged people, depict them in the most graphically, unflatteringly unattractive way possible and in the end do a unconvincing half-hearted volte face and want us to believe exactly the contrary.
In fact, it is the politically correct end which makes the movie appear very pretentious and hypocritical.
All they had to do was make the fat girl dump Shallow Hal and go back to her ex-boyfriend. So Hal would’ve learnt his lesson and maybe rebound on his neighbour (who happens to be hawt too!)… that would’ve made for a more honest ending, even if it was politically incorrect for him to end up with an attractive woman.
I don’t see why the audience wouldn’t have bought that! The Farelly Brothers did make fun of mentally ill people in Dumb and Dumber, they made fun of the blind boy in the same film when they con the blind boy into buying a dead parrot!
We have come to expect the Farelly Brothers to say the most politically incorrect things and to their credit, they do a super job of that! So why try and con the world into believing that beauty is only skin deep?
Discussing this movie with colleagues brought me to another discussion, thanks to my affinity in using the words ‘hawt chicks’ in every other sentence.
Are looks important?
Why are most men particular about “hawt chicks?”
Hmmm! Well, to answer that question for Sudhish Kamath, I will have to submit the following. My client picked up the words ‘hawt chicks’ after having watched the movie ‘Dude, Where’s My Car?’ The way these words are used so often in the movie makes the whole usage wickedly funny. My client Sudhish picked up the usage ever since and has been using the terminology to refer to anyone from Mirabai to Mother Teresa! (Basically hawt chicks have been rounded off to women in general… Anyone who’s known me knows that the women I refer to as ‘hawt chicks’ aren’t exactly the ones you would find on the cover of Cosmopolitan or even Kiran TV for that matter and nor has any of my romantic interests over the last two years been over five foot one inch!).
Back to the question: Are looks important?
To answer that on a more general level, men only say they dig ‘hawt chicks’ just like how women say they need the Tall, dark, handsome hunk. Leching is an entirely different game. For every guy leching at Yana Gupta’s tender thighs in the Babuji number, there is a girl lusting after Brad Pitt’s thunder thighs in Troy!
Yet, are men more superficial than women? Difficult to say, but giving the girls the benefit of doubt, I would dare say they can be quite superficial sometimes.
It doesn’t matter what they look like, they will go behind the prettiest girl in the class with religious commitment to profess their love for her! It’s this rather mysterious yet much-abused concept called ‘Love at first sight’! And there are actually women in this world who’ve bought that kinda shit too!
I, for one, do not believe in love at first sight. Or let’s just say I do believe in it, only that I prefer to call it something else. It’s called Lust.
And, lust aint a bad word at all!
Men do it. Women do it.
And some times, it is the lust that often triggers off the attraction. That being the case, who dare ask: Why are looks considered that important?
Hmm… Was talking to one of my friends regarding this. For him looks are important.. Coz its the “packaging”/outer appearance of a product which piques his interest. What a person actually is, are like the contents of the package which sustain or increase his interest!
Hey, thanks for stopping by at my blog. I really love Cameron Crowe, Jerry Maguire and Almost Famous are favourites.
As for the looks debate, looks do matter but only up to a point, and it is such a subjective thing. Personally, I find John Abraham and all male models in that league repulsive. It could also have to do with the fact that many of them are dyed-in-the-wool morons.
anon:
do i know your friend?? sounds very familiar!!
but I wud agree that in a lot of cases, men do seem to notice women only by their looks! but, like ur friend says, that alone aint enuff to sustain interest!
but it also works the other way, when men do notice the woman who has been around for ages, so much that they had almost taken her for granted!!
or sometimes, something they had said or written cud have caught their attention first and looks are just a value addition!
the bride:
You are surely from the last category I mentioned in my previous comment to anon!
Cuz wat u wrote really caught my attention!!
I mean are u for real??
or has someone made you up to get even with me for a prank I played on them!!
You do seem very er… scripted!
You are a Cameron Crowe-QT fan!! You like half the movies I do..
But going thru all those entries in ur blog… u gotta be real I guess!! Cuz nobody wud take that much effort to play a prank on me! (or I hope!)
So good to know you girl!
Cheers!
And do keep coming back! 🙂
@ Suderman: The bride is real 🙂
@ Bride: Nice seeing you on here too 🙂 And certainly nice to see the two of you acquainted.. lol
Liked your observations about looks,but hey Love@First Sight def. does not translate to lust. Not been personally struck by that coz I believe in Love Only after Many Many Sights when U get to Know the Person very intimately.Apart from that, Gr8 observations.Keep bloggin.
George Carlin’s views on ‘euphemisms’:
I don’t like words that hide the truth. I don’t words that conceal reality. I don’t like euphemisms, or euphemistic language. And American English is loaded with euphemisms. Cause Americans have a lot of trouble dealing with reality. Americans have trouble facing the truth, so they invent the kind of a soft language to protest themselves from it, and it gets worse with every generation. For some reason, it just keeps getting worse. I’ll give you an example of that. There’s a condition in combat. Most people know about it. It’s when a fighting person’s nervous system has been stressed to it’s absolute peak and maximum. Can’t take any more input. The nervous system has either (click) snapped or is about to snap. In the first world war, that condition was called shell shock. Simple, honest, direct language. Two syllables, shell shock. Almost sounds like the guns themselves. That was seventy years ago.
Then a whole generation went by and the second world war came along and very same combat condition was called battle fatigue. Four syllables now. Takes a little longer to say. Doesn’t seem to hurt as much. Fatigue is a nicer word than shock. Shell shock! Battle fatigue.
Then we had the war in Korea, 1950. Madison avenue was riding high by that time, and the very same combat condition was called operational exhaustion. Hey, were up to eight syllables now! And the humanity has been squeezed completely out of the phrase. It’s totally sterile now. Operational exhaustion. Sounds like something that might happen to your car.
Then of course, came the war in Viet Nam, which has only been over for about sixteen or seventeen years, and thanks to the lies and deceits surrounding that war, I guess it’s no surprise that the very same condition was called post-traumatic stress disorder. Still eight syllables, but we’ve added a hyphen! And the pain is completely buried under jargon. Post-traumatic stress disorder. I’ll bet you if we’d of still been calling it shell shock, some of those Viet Nam veterans might have gotten the attention they needed at the time. I’ll betcha. I’ll betcha.
But. But, it didn’t happen, and one of the reasons. One of the reasons is because we were using that soft language. That language that takes the life out of life. And it is a function of time. It does keep getting worse. I’ll give you another example. Sometime during my life. Sometime during my life, toilet paper became bathroom tissue. I wasn’t notified of this. No one asked me if I agreed with it. It just happened.
Toilet paper became bathroom tissue. Sneakers became running shoes. False teeth became dental appliances. Medicine became medication. Information became directory assistance. The dump became the landfill. Car crashes became automobile accidents. Partly cloudy bacame partly sunny. Motels became motor lodges. House trailers became mobile homes. Used cars became previously owned transportation. Room service became guest-room dining. And constipation became occasional irregularity.
When I was a little kid, if I got sick they wanted me to go to the hospital and see a doctor. Now they want me to go to a health maintenance organization…or a wellness center to consult a healthcare delivery professional. Poor people used to live in slums. Now the economically disadvantaged occupy substandard housing in the inner cities.
Source: http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Bwqgqw-abycJ:voip-blog.tmcnet.com/blog/rich-tehrani/voip/blogging-true-news-delivery.html+george+carlin+on+euphemisms&hl=en
aNTi!
Yeah, she is!
And she’s my new best friend!
sachin!
thanks dude!
It was love at first sight when I first saw pam anderson pal! I understand wat u mean! 😉
sanchapanzo,
WTF?!
Suderman,
WTF?!
🙂
Thought you might like George Carlin’s views on ‘Euphemisms’, since your opinion also goes in-line with Carlin’s opinion on euphemism aka politically incorrect! Anyway, ignore this post if you dont find anything collinear between your thoughts on political correctness with that of George Carlin’s euphemims.
fyi: George Carlin is a stand-up comedian, his thoughts on most-topcis is considered controversial but nevertheless enjoyable!
sanchapanzo!
ha ha!
WTF was a euphemism born out a quick glance thru ur comment-bigger-than-my-post… almost discarded it as junk at first glance.. just re-re-read it only now!
now it makes sense!
thanks!
🙂
suderman,
Thought you might like it and now glad you liked it!
I am a huge fan of ‘George Carlin’. He really has this no nonsense way of expressing ideas.
I finally read this post in its completeness!
It’s this rather mysterious yet much-abused concept called ‘Love at first sight’! And there are actually women in this world who’ve bought that kinda shit too!
Well said!
I, for one, do not believe in love at first sight. Or let’s just say I do believe in it, only that I prefer to call it something else. It’s called Lust.
Wow, Are you my Kumbh Ke Mele mein koya hua bhai?
(*makes a mental note to ask his parents if they have ever been to Allahabad and starts singing kasu mele kasu vandhu, hoping to hear a esa paatu!)
Hi Suderaman: Sudara man is Hot man ever in search of matching wavelengths – Hot Chicks. I have seen your blog quite a number of times, but thought of posting a comment only today.
So – I am just trying to say something, but nothing comes.
Happy journey to Korea – try eating some snake soup or scorpion fries there!
Swaha-a.
yeh shallow hal was rather shallow.
what where trying to say ?the only way u can fall in love with a fat person ,is by imagining them thin?
talking of looks ,u definitly can’t overlook it .
sanchapanzo,i think i might like Georg carlin.