Lost in translation, this flick goes BUST!
Cast: Anil Kapoor, Irrfan, Tanushree Dutta, Suniel Shetty, Sushma Reddy, Arshad Warsi, Emraan Hashmi
Director: Vivek Agnihotri
Genre: Suspense drama
Storyline: A London-based lawyer has to save two Indians suspected in a bank robbery and a bomb blast.
Bottomline: Shoplifted chocolate damaged in transit, lost in translation.
“The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.”
“How do you shoot the devil in the back? What if you miss? “
“He kills their kids, he kills their wives, he kills their parents and their parents’ friends. He burns down the houses they live in and the stores they work in, he kills people that owe them money. And like that he was gone. Underground. Nobody has ever seen him since. He becomes a myth, a spook story that criminals tell their kids at night… And no-one ever really believes. “
“That you did not know you stole from him is the only reason you are still alive, but he feels you owe him. You will repay your debt.”
Christopher McQuarrie, winner of the Academy Awards for Best Original Screenplay (1995) will not be pleased to find out that a Hindi film has more than half a dozen of his lines translated, almost verbatim.
Keyser Soze becomes Murtaza Arzai in Inspired Films’ ‘Chocolate,’ a film so dishonest that it makes you cringe.
There is a huge difference between what is inspired and what is plagiarised. And that difference comes out when you replicate exactly the same opening scene, the same lines and dumb down the smart idea to an extent that destroys the entire brilliance of it.
Vivek Agnihotri’s film is not even as much a deviation as Sanjay Gupta’s ‘Kaante’ was from ‘Reservoir Dogs’ though even the ‘Kaante’ pinched a line or two from the original (” Are you gonna bark all day, little doggy, or are you gonna bite?”). Interestingly, ‘Reservoir Dogs’ itself was Tarantino’s tribute to Kubrick’s ‘The Killing.’ Or what ‘Sarkar’ was to ‘The Godfather.’ That’s the kind of difference there is, between a glorious tribute and a shameless rip-off.
‘Chocolate’ is not a frame-to-frame copy and many times during the film, you wish it was. The visual brilliance (cinematography: Attar Singh Saini) and the slick editing (Satyajeet Gazmer) do not compensate the poorly written lines that make a caricature out of the leading man Krishna Pandit (Anil Kapoor), a leading lawyer who hogs the cover of GQ magazine for his flair for winning the most difficult of cases.
As his journalist friend Monsoon (Sushma Reddy) gets him to help two Indians suspected in the involvement of a blast in a boat and a bank robbery, Pandit wants to know the truth and not versions from the suspects Pipi (Irrfan) and Sim (Tanushree Dutta). How did their fellow band members and associates Rocker (Suniel Shetty), Tubby (Arshad Warsi) and Devaa (Emraan Hashmi) die? What exactly is their involvement with the mysterious Murtaza Arzai?
And, what on the planet is ‘Chocolate’ and why is the film called that, are some of the questions the film answers in its semi-absorbing narrative, with plenty of help from the original. It is the original scenes where the film falters. The overtly overdone sexual references turn out to be pretentious and very wannabe Hollywoodish.
Anil Kapoor does an earnest job, puts in a decent effort but is let down by the lines, Irrfan does a pretty neat underplayed version of what Pankaj Kapoor did with greater charisma in ‘Dus’ reprising the same role of what Kevin Spacey did in the original. Arshad Warsi sparkles with his comic timing and gives the film a few genuine laughs while Sushma Reddy has very little to do but act goofy and insecure about her crush Krish. You can actually keep a count on the number of ploys the director uses to ensure you don’t miss her bra… er… bratty obsessive compulsive behaviour of her trying to attract your attention to her er… stuff you know.
Poor Suniel Shetty gets into another one of those ensemble insignificant roles he’s so used to and lets his long hair do all the acting.
There’s plenty of oomph in the form of Tanushree Dutta who carries off the shortest shorts and the tiniest tops with great atTITude, only negated by the director’s basic instinct to make her look like Sharon Stone through the cross-legged poses and pouts. Oh yes, as much as you try, you won’t be able to take your eyes of her cleve… er… clever disposition to sport titsy-bitsy tops enough to cause a bust-up of sorts and make you want her bosom… b-oops… I mean make you want TO BE her bosom friend…. phooof!
While the song and dance sequences will ensure that the front-benchers are kept happy, the verbose interrogation sequences are likely to turn them off. And, the subsequent dumbing-down of the revelation sequence in the climax is guaranteed to strongly disappoint the classy audience, especially those who have seen the original.
Bryan Singer’s ‘The Usual Suspects’ is immensely watchable for it makes you admire the story-telling, no matter how many times you’ve seen it before. Here, the fact that you know the story only makes the story-telling look that much more miserable.
Hence, this dose of shoplifted ‘Chocolate’ is prescribed only for those who haven’t seen the role that fetched Kevin Spacey his Oscar.
MADRAS INK. 
a nice movie topped up with a cool review.
and what more?
Kaante itself had a li’l bit of Usual suspects in the beginning..
I first saw the review in “The Hindu” – Friday Review.
I found a contradiction in it. While the image of the film reads “FRAME-BY-FRAME COPY” : Chocolate, the review itself goes something like this:
‘Chocolate’ is not a frame-to-frame copy and many times during the film, you wish it was…………
sheks:
didya actually say nice movie?
🙂
zero:
yup!!
karthik:
review is mine… the caption isnt. the subeditor probably thot of punning it with the pic.
yeah.it was nice.specially tanushree dutta.
hi,
read ur review of chocolate and the
comments that went with it. i found it to be a sort of
DCH type of guy forum. being a girl its easy to detect
that. very guy forum. but i saw a possibility of …
ok i dont know whats teh word i am lookign for so i’ll
say this another way.
tell me, if i feel like ripping cinema of certain
types, and waxing eloquent about certain others, can i
feel free to do it with you? i have posted just one
blog, (www.priyaramanathan.blogspot.com) which a
freind of mine insisted i should use as a forum to
invite, i daresay, readership. one, i dont seem
inclined, to do the blogging thing regularly, and two,
the technology connected with it, like the
hyperlinking funda etc. gets very cumbersome for a
latteral thinking, analogue mode, dyslexic ,like
myself.
anyways, thought i’d say hi. please dont read my
‘complete profile’ on blogspot, its dumb.
Priya