• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • July 2011
    M T W T F S S
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    25262728293031
    « Jun   Aug »
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Archive For July 24th, 2011

The Expletive Strikes Back: How Censors f*ck with film…

July 24, 2011 · by sudhishkamath

June was a big month for Indian cinema. We can’t really say the month cinema grew up because no one becomes an adult by just swearing. But yes, it turned just about old enough to enter a frat house, at least according to the Censors.

It was the month when our films finally admitted some of the most ostracized and choicest of expletives on to the movie screen – even if they were just used for fun. While Aaranya Kaandam took the Censors to court to get the nod, Delhi Belly had the backing of Aamir Khan to sneak it past the board. It probably helped that the film was largely in English and the Censors were allowing Hollywood films with far more explicit content into the country.

“I used expletives to portray the mood of the character or the moment,” says director Thiagarajan Kumaraja who made ‘Aaranya Kaandam.’ “Earlier, unless there was something as heinous as rape, characters would be granted permission to use a swear word – like Bastard. But we use such words in a traffic jam, we even fondly call friends swear words. Maybe those days, probably friends never abused each other. Maybe they called each other ‘Brother.’ So our censor and government officers from another era would find swear words disturbing.”

Kumararaja also believes this wasn’t always the case. “What’s surprising is that the word ‘thevidiya’ was used very casually thrown around in an old black and white AVM film called Sabapathy just for the sake of humour. I have seen smooching scenes of TA Mathuram and NS Krishnan (can’t recall the name of the film). But I don’t know what happened suddenly. We regressed. But today, the society has become liberal and the censors haven’t caught up.”

It was in 1952 when India, fresh out of British rule and under the spell of the Victorian morality, drafted the Cinematograph Act that imposed censorship of all cinematic content meant for public exhibition. While films before this were largely censored for political content, the Central Board for Film Certification eventually turned into a moral guardian for the society. Hollywood went through a similar phase in the 1950s when Billy Wilder defied the censorship code with his teasingly raunchy portrayals of Marilyn Monroe in Some Like It Hot and The Seven Year Itch.

Though we had the occasional film slip past the censors under the guise of arthouse cinema, swearing for the sake of humour or entertainment, especially if it wasn’t emotionally called for, was a strict no-no. On the contrary, the vigilance just became all the more stricter over the years. While Raj Kapoor got away with even nudity in the seventies and eighties, Nagesh Kukunoor in the nineties, had to take the fight up to the Tribunal to get Hyderabad Blues, his film ridden with unprecedented four letter words in Indian cinema cleared.

Maybe because aesthetics of nudity can always be debated in a country that gave  the world the Kamasutra, the Censors also warmed up to all the sex and kissing over the last decade. But swearing, no, it was and is still considered uncouth and low art.

“I asked the Censors how come characters in ‘No One Killed Jessica’ are allowed to use four letter words and we are not,” Gautham Menon recalls his negotiation during ‘Nadunisi Naaygal.’ “They said, it may be acceptable in the North but we are like this only. We do not want to hear swear words.”

Luv Ranjan, director of Pyaar Ka Punchnama, had to take his film through four revising committees before he could get a U/A certificate. “With censors, it’s different if you are Aamir Khan Productions or Yash Raj Films. Otherwise, they give you a really hard time. They said my theme is adult but yaar, even marriage is an adult institution. There’s no liability or accountability from the Censors because the people on the committee do it on a honorary basis. They come to watch a film that are not made for them for a Rs. 700 a day allowance. Imagine want kind of people would do that work? Who are these people passing judgment on investments of Rs. 25 crores and Rs.30 crores? You can’t question them, they can’t be sued, they cannot be punished. Legally, they have no accountability.”

And then came the surrogate swear word. More like, if you won’t allow me to swear, I will make up a word that sounds just like the one I want to use or use an existing word that sounds like a cuss word. If Delhi Belly made DK Bose run, Singham’s trailer employs the lesser used Urdu word ‘faqt’ (only) to the same effect as the English swear word it sounds like and Double Dhamaal plays with balls and calls a guy ‘Gandul’ (Pigeon Pea).

The surrogate swear word, a byproduct of repression of six decades, cleared by the Censors, has now entered the public domain through the television and gets easily picked up by kids, an audience the film is not intended for. Ask any kid singing Bhaag DK Bose.

Gandu, directed by Q, pushes the envelope further with its unprintable Bengali cuss-word title. “My intention was to legitimise the adjective by granting it the status of a noun. Hence, a word that wouldn’t have been printed in any Indian publication becomes accepted,” says Q. But Gandu earned its place under the sun by winning accolades in some of the most prestigious film festivals around the world including Slamdance and Berlin. When it plays at the Censor-exempted Naya Cinema Film Festival in Mumbai in its first ever “overground” screening in the country this month, it will kick another door wide open.

But the day it applies for censorship, we have to pray that our Censors decide that adults in this country are really old enough to watch a film with expletives and pornographic content.

(A censored version of this story appeared here)

Singham: No lion this, fakta cheater cock

July 24, 2011 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Action

Director: Rohit Shetty

Cast: Ajay Devgn, Prakash Raj, Kajal Aggarwal

Storyline: An honest Inspector from a remote village is transferred to the big bad city for messing with ace-kidnapper villain

Bottomline: Singham, if you are an action film, be an action film. Don’t try to be police drama if it’s ends up looking like comedy.

When the villain of the film, Jaykant Shikre (a superbly comic Prakash Raj) tells the hero, Bajirao Singham (Devgn looking angry and stoned all through) “Yeh, cheating hai” when he’s outnumbered 1:500, you tend to agree with the villain.

Yes, boss. That is cheating. That is no way to treat a villain. And not when you’re a fearless hero who has just finished giving a lecture to the entire police force about going and doing “mardonwala kaam” (a man’s job) only minutes before that.

The climax of the film ruins all the good work done by the makers until then.

It’s unfortunate because two-thirds of the film is a fairly engaging, diluted yet faithful, technically improved adaptation of the Tamil mass entertainer directed by Hari.

The original wasn’t the best film around but it had a few smarts, pace and fury and worked despite its cheesy visual effects purely because of Suriya who made the corniest lines sound good. Devgn does exactly the opposite. He takes some half-decent lines (by Farhad and Sajid) and makes them sound outrightly cheesy. Yet, it should be pointed out that the man’s got piercing presence. Especially when he’s in a vest.

But it’s Prakash Raj who steals the show from right under his nose, making the most of his lines by playing it completely camp and relishing his role as the new baddie in Bollytown.

Rohit Shetty grossly underestimates the role of the villain here. The ace-kidnapper turned politician is pretty much harmless. It hasn’t occurred to him to hit the hero hard where it hurts (Hello, what’s the heroine there for, Einstein?) or at least make the bad guy grab a school kid when his life is in danger, more so when he DOES have a gun in hand and a whole bunch of kids to pick from.

As a result, we never fear the villain despite all his dialoguebaazi about being the hunter because Shetty only makes Shikre seem as dangerous as Shikari Shambu.

The hero is equally stupid. Inspector Singham is not required to do any sort of thinking either. No Sherlock Holmes like deduction or scientific approach to investigation because Shetty wants to conserve Devgn’s energies to jump around like a lion to chants of Singham that will ring in your ears for hours after you’ve left the hall. We cannot blame the villain for not kidnapping the heroine (Kajal Aggarwal wasted) in this version because the hero never seems to care enough for her.

While the original was just about a personal feud, this one has larger ambitions of being a meaningful ode to the police force heavily influenced by Rajkumar Santoshi’s Khakee. Maybe Golmaal finally got its revenge on the action director because Rohit Shetty ends up making you laugh (some intentionally and a lot unintentionally especially with the silly subtext of suggesting that the police department should become the new Omerta-enforcing-mafia in town) in the climax when he should be sticking to the basic promise of the action film. Offer stunts. Blow up cars. Beat up guys. Imagine an action film that promises unbelievable action choreography that ends without any dishoom dishoom whatsoever in the climax.

It’s the biggest cheat in the history of Hindi action films. It’s not even an interesting twist. Like Shikre said, it’s just cheating. No fighting.

Why Singham? Ran out of ‘dumm’? Or ‘faqta’ budget, umm?

Yes, ‘faqt’ apparently is an archaic Urdu word that means ‘only’. Even the Censors hadn’t heard of it but passed it because the makers insisted that they wanted Devgn to say: “Jisme hai Dumm, faqta Bajirao Singham” (Who has the guts, only Bajirao Singham). Yes, the writing in this film is that juvenile. Not to forget, twisted.

(This review originally appeared here.)

  • Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 483 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar