• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • December 2025
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
    « Dec    
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Browsing Category Archives

Website under construction.

Oscar Countdown – 2: Who will have the last laugh?

February 19, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

In Ben Stiller’s Tropic Thunder, a multiple-Oscar winning actor (Robert Downey Junior) advises a fellow actor on how to play eccentric to get the Academy’s attention:

“Everybody knows you never go full retard… Dustin Hoffman, ‘Rain Man,’ looked retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Counted toothpicks, cheated cards. Autistic, sure. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, ‘Forrest Gump.’ Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain’t retarded. Peter Sellers, “Being There.” Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard. You don’t buy that? Ask Sean Penn, 2001, “I Am Sam.” Remember? Went full retard, went home empty handed…”

The Academy sure has a great sense of humour. Despite his tongue in cheek observation, Downey Jr. is one of the nominees for Best Supporting Actor for playing another of those eccentric characters that get Academy’s attention – an actor with an identity crisis who takes refuge in the characters he’s playing.

But, as Anthony Dod Mantle, cinematographer of Slumdog Millionaire observes, “He cannot beat a dead man.” Heath Ledger has won every other Best Actor in a Supporting role award this year for his portrayal of Joker in The Dark Knight.

Here’s a quick look at the nominees, nonetheless.

Josh Brolin (Milk): Plays the Dan White who’s been driven over the edge by Harvey Milk (Sean Penn) – the first openly gay man to hold public office – the man who has taken his place. His role requires him to get irritable and increasingly angry to the point of taking the law in his own hands and Brolin acquits it credibly with the intensity it deserves. Applause? Yes. Award? No.

Robert Downey Jr. (Tropic Thunder): Plays three-time Oscar Winner Kirk Lazarus, an Australian actor who has undergone pigment alteration surgery to play an African American War Veteran Lincoln Osiris. He’s required to play an actor who’s always consumed by the characters he plays and Iron Man shows us his funny side and has us laugh till the tummy hurts.

Philip Seymour Hoffman (Doubt): Plays a priest suspected of molesting an African-American student. The seasoned actor has no problems at all in keeping it grey. He convinces you he’s innocent one moment and the next, he has you wondering if he’s a slimeball behind the robes. Great acting, no doubt.

Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight): Lives on as one of the most deliciously wicked villains of all time. He almost had the audience cheer for Joker instead of Batman. It wouldn’t be too wrong to say that the role consumed him. May his soul rest in peace. Heath every bit deserves this Oscar.

Michael Shannon (Revolutionary Road): Plays a role that would make Kirk Lazarus chuckle. As a young man released from a mental institution, he represents the insanity of dreams and ambition and acts as the conscience of the lead pair who are torn between their desire to go live in Paris to find out what they really like doing and their regular rut of monotony.

 * * *

While we can safely say there would be no surprises in that category, the Best Actor in a Leading Role is a tough guess. Here’s a look at the men in the race.

Brad Pitt (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button): As Benjamin Button, a man who ages in reverse, charming Pitt relies heavily on make up and visual effects. The acting though quite subtle and understated, is not his best work this year. Now, Burn After Reading was something else. Too bad he didn’t get a Supporting Actor nomination for that one.

Frank Langhella (Frost/Nixon): Plays Richard Nixon, the tainted President post-Watergate, who soon after his resignation strikes a deal with TV host David Frost for a series of interviews to clear his name and highlight his legacy. It’s a delight to watch Mr. Langhella play the tough-talking ex-Prez who turns out to be a hard nut to crack. Well, almost. And that ‘almost’ is the bit that makes him deserve the prize but he’ll really have to wrestle for it.

Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler): As Randy The Ram, a professional wrestler whose life changes after a heart attack and a bypass surgery, Mickey Rourke chokes us to tears when he tries hard to win his daughter back. “I’m an old broken down piece of meat and I deserve to be all alone, I just don’t want you to hate me.” As a more disturbing and darker version of ‘Rocky Balboa,’ Rourke looks every bit and even literally breathes like a man that age and size would. I would put my money on The Ram.

Richard Jenkins (The Visitor): We’ve seen bitter old men with their quirks walk away with the prize before but this year, Jenkins has tough competition. He plays a boring old professor who likes to be alone, trying to get over his wife’s death until he meets an illegal immigrant who introduces a new rhythm into his life and falls in love again. But for one moment when he bursts into anger and yells his guts out at the heartlessness of the system, there’s nothing else in the film that demands histrionics.

Sean Penn (Milk): Penn has to be smooth-talking, charming, effeminate and aggressive at the same time, playing Harvey Milk, the first openly gay man to hold public office. The role demands him to deliver serious speeches, kiss men passionately and showcase a sensitivity, tenderness and vulnerability seldom associated with leading men. Penn plays all of this naturally and if not for the veterans like Langhella and Rourke, he would have stood a good chance. But then, given the political content of the film, he still does. (Update: He did win)

Chinmayi: Miss Multi Media

February 19, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

What do you call a girl who’s made herself heard on every platform there is, except maybe the ones at the railway station?

In this part of the world, since there aren’t many, you can call her Chinmayi Sripada.

The Super Singer has treaded film, TV, radio, web and print, across multiple-languages (she runs a translation services company) and is one of the few eligible single girls in the city with multiple interests.

She’s just finished a set of interviews on Delhi 6 and says she was surprised to see her name credited in the soundtrack. “I had no clue I had sung for Delhi 6 until I heard the track. I coudn’t recognise the lyrics or the co-singers or the song. I was like how could I not recognise a song I had sung? And then it fell into place… I had sung some three lines when I had gone to Rahman’s studio to record something else.”

“Every song I’ve sung for Rahman has been different. You will not find anything common between Santhippoma, Deivam Thantha Poove or Sahana. A lot of people said Sahana didn’t sound like me and it sounded like a computer. I didn’t know if it was an insult or a compliment but for my own mental peace, I decided to take it as a compliment. It took a few live shows before people knew it was really me and not some computer altered sound.”

Mamma’s girl

 Chinmayi has come a long way since her TV debut as a singer in Saptaswarangal, and considers her mother to be the single biggest influence in her life. “Born in Bombay, my father left us when I was one and a half. That was so long ago that I don’t care anymore. My Mom tells me it was karanakalyanam… it happened so that I could be born. She didn’ have to answer to anybody and had the complete freedom to do whatever she wanted to do with me. She’s my Guru.”

She pulled out of regular school after Class 10, learnt German, attempted learning French, began a long love affair with dance that continues till date, switched to Hindustani music after starting out with Carnatic music, learnt web designing as her singing career took off and as years passed, graduated in psychology.

But even when she was in school, Chinmayi became a tax-payer. “No big deal. I’m sure all these Johnson babies from the ads have PAN cards too… I hope,” she laughs.

She got her first break as a singer with Kannathil Muthammital. Singer Srinivas had noticed her in the singing contest ‘Saptaswarangal’ and had put her on to A.R. Rahman. She has been singing for him since.

Her German classes too paid off when her cousin gave her a 120-page German document to translate. Soon, she got a few more assignments.

“Blue Elephant, my language translation services company was formed as a via-media between the corporate and the linguist. I have never had to advertise it and word-of-mouth alone has helped me sustain it for four years,” she reveals.

At any point of time, Blue Elephant has 25 to 40 linguists working on different assignments. “We make sure that the linguists who are translating assignments are doing it in their mother tongue and have some knowledge of the material they are translating.”

As aggressive as she sounds, Chinmayi says that all that she’s got herself into is only a result of someone convincing her to try something new. “It was Manimaran, a friend of my Mom, who wanted me to participate in Saptaswarangal. It was blogger Kiruba who suggested that I should start blogging to connect with people who like my music and it worked. Super Singer was something I took up because I found the offer interesting and after that, Aahaa FM called me to give RJing a shot. So if you are asking me what’s my approach, I don’t have one. If I’m good at it, good. If I suck, never mind, I at least tried.”

In the last three years, her blog has had over five lakh page views.

“Blogging has been cathartic,” she says, talking about the experience of interacting with fans, strangers and anonymous trolls too. “Sometimes, I have been immature and have fought back. My Mom watches what I do and there are times when she has had to pull me back from a raging war. Ten years later, if I’m still around and worth being interviewed, I don’t want someone to pick out a comment and say how could you be so stupid? So there’s accountability and responsibility of watching what you say on record.”

To deal with trouble-makers, Chinmayi has made her blog a moderated forum. “Especially during Super Singer, everybody had an opinion but I couldn’t allow for it to go on my blog. No matter what the criticism is, reality shows do open up doors for singers. It’s another thing that I would never allow my children to get into a reality show type of a contest. As a host, I had to be detached. It was just a job.”

When she took up the said job, she was an introvert. “It brought out a dimension that I didn’t know existed. People who knew me from the days of Saptaswarangal could not believe how much I was talking.”

 With so much on her plate, does she get to eat out on a date? Or is she uploading photographs onto an obscure matrimonial site for Iyengars?

She giggles explaining how she’s been fighting that off. “Well, see, I’m sure it will happen when it has to. I don’t have a plan. My mom is on the verge of giving up, saying ‘This girl is of no use. She’s not finding someone for herself.’ I don’t know what it is not to have a single life. I don’t know what it is like to be seeing someone. We’ll see how things work when someone else comes into my life.”

Five things you didn’t know about Chinmayi

1. Mathematics is the demon in my life. I am glad I got rid of it.

2. I am a classical dancer. I do Odissi.

3. I am quite adventurous. I have always wanted to skydive but my mom always comes in the way.

4. I once jumped off a terrace to prove a point – that girls can do pretty much what boys can.

5. I like gifting books with personalised notes. People think I belong to the 12th century because I still write letters.

Oscar Countdown – 3: A look at Best Films/Directors

February 18, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Slumdog Millionaire

Cast: Anil Kapoor, Irrfan Khan, Dev Patel, Freida Pinto

Director: Danny Boyle

Quick take: Two brothers find themselves on either side of the law. What’s changed from the seventies? The angry young man has become a system conforming consumerist, information has become power and people find escape through reality television, especially since life in modern-day India can be larger than film. Jamal Malik, a chaiwala from a call centre seems to know all the answers in the game show. Did he cheat? The most entertaining and only fast-paced film of the lot, Danny Boyle’s ode to Mumbai and Indian cinema, may not have set the local box office on fire here. But its unique texture, manic energy and inventive style gives the film an edge over the others nominees.

Pros: The kids – absolutely natural, Rahman’s peppy score, the recklessly wicked camerawork by Anthony Dod Mantle and the unique premise of setting a thriller in the backdrop of a game show. Also, the fact that Bollywood has never got its due at the Oscars may just go in favour of this film.

Cons: The unsettling shift from Hindi to English halfway into the film, the conveniently chronological order of flashbacks to suit the order of questions and the shameless sprinkling of Bollywood masala.

The Odds: Given its current record, clearly the favourite for Best Film and Best Director. Likely to take home the prize for Cinematography and the Best Original Score too.

* * *

The Reader

Cast: Kate Winslet, Ralph Fiennes, David Cross

Director: Stephen Daldry

Quick Take: A slow period film set in Germany about a fifteen year old boy who has an affair with a woman twice his age. They form an unusual bond over sex and reading. Kate Winslet is practically naked for half her screen-time and compensates by playing a deglamourised old woman for the other half of the film. The drama in this tragic romance does bring a tear or two but the brooding mood of the film weighs it down further considerably.

Pros: Kate Winslet’s presence, the suspense and the epic nature of the romance.

Cons: Sluggishly slow pace and if there’s anything between the lines, it’s difficult to read especially if you aren’t into literature or history.

The Odds: The only film that’s capable of creating an upset for the Best Director award over Slumdog Millionaire.

* * *

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Cast: Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Julia Ormond

Director: David Fincher

Quick Take: Nearly three hours long, this story of a man born old and dying as a baby seems like Brad Pitt’s desperate shot at the Oscars. If Forrest Gump’s Momma always said: “Life’s a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re gonna get,” Benjamin Button’s ‘Mama’ always says: “You never know what’s comin’ for you.” Like Titanic, an old woman on her death-bed begins to tell the story of her lover.

Pros: Great production values, some fantastic effects, meticulous make-up and Brad Pitt, of course.

Cons: The pace. And you can say that again.

The Odds: The film with the most nominations may not go home with the most number of Oscars.

* * *

Milk

Cast: Sean Penn, Emile Hirsch, Josh Brolin, James Franco

Director: Gus Van Sant

Quick Take: The biopic of America’s first openly gay man who was elected to public office as a member of San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors has Sean Pean deliver another fantastic performance that’s got him in the run for Best Actor. Gus Van Sant gives it a credibly authentic feel employing documentary techniques and lets Penn’s persona and portrayal take care of the rest.

Pros: Sean Penn, the speech-scenes and the sense of realism till the very end.

Cons: Too political and observational to be an entertaining film

The Odds: You can see why this has been nominated for Best Director and Actor but doesn’t seem to stand a chance for Best Film.

* * *

Frost/Nixon

Cast: Frank Langhella, Michael Sheen, Kevin Bacon

Director: Ron Howard

Quick Take: The documentary-like film goes behind the scenes of one of the most watched television programmes in American history – the controversial series of interviews where David Frost finally cracked the tough talking Richard Nixon. If Milk only borrowed documentary techniques, this one’s a full-fledged documentary with supers, dates, quotes, newspaper clips, reports and multiple-accounts of the television event but it is the face-off between two fantastic actors that makes this film watchable. 

Pros: Frank Langhella’s dominating persona, the editing that tightens up a film that could’ve so easily fallen apart.

Cons: Too academic to be taken seriously as entertainment.

The Odds: The nod for a Best Director nomination is understandable. Does not stand much of a chance in the Best Film category.

* * *

Billu: This barber needs trimming

February 15, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Drama

Director: Priyadarshan

Cast: Irrfan Khan, Shah Rukh Khan, Lara Dutta, Om Puri

Storyline: A poor hairdresser becomes the centre of attention when his long lost childhood friend, now a superstar, checks in to his village for a film shoot.

Bottomline: Stay far away if you’ve seen the original or even the Tamil remake

 Warning: If you’ve seen the earlier versions (Katha Parayumbol in Malayalam and Kuselan in Tamil), and haven’t had a hair-cut in months, watching Billu may make you pull your hair out.

Apart from Irrfan Khan’s magnificently subtle performance and Shah Rukh Khan’s larger than life onscreen persona, there’s not a single strand of sincerity in this lazily made patch-work production that’s looks so obviously staged.

The film’s fake as a synthetic wig.

Not that we are looking for realism in a story based on folklore (the Krishna-Sudama friendship), but right from the setting, nothing seems genuine – it is difficult to imagine locations seen so often in Tamil Cinema (the kind you usually associate with Chinna Gounder movies) inhabit the same world as the horribly kitschy North Indian set. The villagers talk in a curiously old-fashioned filmy dialect and the cast (but for the Khans) goes gloriously over the top.

Lara Dutta personifies everything wrong with this film. First, it’s an over-dramatic portrayal that’s clearly artificial. Second, she speaks a language she can’t speak well enough. Three, she sports a backless choli that’s a little too sexy for us to believe she’s a goat-herd/milkmaid. Four, she’s got kids that don’t look like her or their father. Yes, the only thing that looks 100 per cent poor is the casting.

Ironically, the superstar’s larger-than-life world looks considerably realistic, even if he’s shooting for a lost-and-found Matrix-meets-Star Wars film, flashing a light-saber. But for that one grin and a maybe couple of SRK quips, the film fails to evoke any response, until the last fifteen minutes – the famous speech scene in the end.

Shah Rukh does reasonably well, probably getting emotional a tad too early in the speech compared to Mammooty or Rajnikant who kept it together for most part of it and broke down only towards the end. Irrfan on the other hand, delivers another one of his masterfully controlled and finely nuanced understatements, letting his body language speak more than any dialogue could. But then, whoever did the score, underscores the sentimental scenes to ridiculously soap operatic levels that after a while it is difficult to appreciate Irrfan.

Billu is ‘Filmed by Priyadarshan,’ the credits tell us.

High time a filmmaker of his experience actually directs his actors and the flow of the narrative instead of just filming it (simply translating it from paper to film). It is impossible to believe this is the same director who made ‘Kanchivaram’. The lack of direction in Billu is shocking to say the least. Sample the scene when a riot breaks loose on the sets of the superstar’s film after someone randomly slaps a policeman at the barricade when they are refused permission. Priyadarshan films it exactly as it reads and makes P.Vasu seem like Spielberg.

Billu may still work for those who haven’t seen the earlier versions of the story and kids who are Shah Rukh Khan fans.

But for those of us who like our hair, the film once called Billu Barber ought to be trimmed. By an hour and a half please.

Dev D: De-Generation Next

February 14, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Drama

Director: Anurag Kashyap

Cast: Abhay Deol, Mahi Gill, Kalki Koechlin

Storyline: Modern day Devdas with sex, drugs and rock ’n roll

Bottomline: A coming of rage interpretation that demands to be watched

 Whatever Anurag Kashyap’s been smoking all these years must be some stuff. What else can you say about the audacity of thought and the psychedelia of vision as presented in his Dev D.

Paro (Mahi Gill) goes down in Hindi film history, even if it’s just off-camera, as the sexually liberated lover taking her Devdas to the third base in the fields of Punjab, the sort of location where Chopras and Johars would usually orchestrate innocuously chaste love songs.

Because, Anurag Kashyap and Abhay Deol have decided that Generation Next has a new favourite four-letter word and that it certainly isn’t love. Dev D is wildly about lust, the hormonal rage of youth and sexual expression than just candy-floss sugar-coated love we’ve been shown in Hindi cinema. It’s also about the politics of sex, the volatility of modern day romance and the avenues of escape when a relationship fails.

The references to Devdas are just an excuse for the makers to explore the refuge of the modern day loser because this isn’t a story of a man who everybody shut their doors on. This is a story of a lover responsible for his alienation.

The definitive difference in Dev D is illustrated when, early on in the film, he nearly gives in to his animal instincts and stops halfway out of guilt. He seizes the first opportunity to suspect his girlfriend of infidelity and that’s more than enough for him to finish what he started out – bed the seductress.

The modern-day loser is more chauvinistic and conservative than all previously seen Devdasses. But the best part about Kashyap’s Dev D is that his women wear the pants and know their way around it too. They are all messed up and products of dysfunctional relationships. The complexity of characterisation and the non-linearity of the narrative (Kashyap uses chapters like Tarantino – Paro’s story, Chanda’s story and finally Dev’s – the cause, the effect and the journey of escape) certainly makes it the most interesting of the Devdas movies.

The actors deliver these characters and that’s half the battle won. Abhay Deol is dormantly explosive and intense, getting increasingly moody and consumed by character deeper into the film. Mahi Gill’s graph has her shift from being the hyper-emotional drama queen to portraying an unsettling amount of calm and Kalki Koechlin’s lucky to let her physicality do most of the work demanded of the role. From being a picture of innocence to a sassy sex worker who chooses her clients, Kalki acquits herself credibly in this feminist take on the tragedy.

Anurag makes this character-study richer opting for stylisation over realism, letting the camera (Rajeev Ravi) trip and music (Amit Trivedi) take control of the proceedings and the second act of the film is inventive storytelling at its best.

Where the film fumbles is right at the start. Dev D employs a tone that seems to be screaming for your attention – like Paro photographing herself naked and getting it printed (hasn’t she heard of email?) or the slutty seductress following up “Do you have a girlfriend” with a line that’s desperately trying to win the frontbenchers over with: “So have you guys done it yet?”

Half a movie later, she decides to replace ‘it’ with the actual verb while telling him that’s all that he wants to do and our Dev D shoots back: “Don’t you?” much to the excited cheers of the crowd that’s not used to such language in a Hindi film.

But for such cheap tricks (and there’s plenty of stuff to just shock the pants off the prudish in the hall), Dev D is a fairly classy film. Hell, it’s a classic and a cult one at that, if you pardon its juvenilia.

Black Friday was too academic. No Smoking tried a little too hard to trip. But with this mix of intriguing entertainment, he’s arrived. You can take a seat right next to Nagesh Kukunoor, Mr. Kashyap. It’s not everyday a filmmaker gets away changing the end of an epic tragedy and still explores the idea behind it, perhaps even more than the original. 

Beeban Kidron: Five years after Bridget Jones

February 12, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

After wrapping up production of the Cillian Murphy-Sienna Miller starrer, ‘Hippie Hippie Shake,’ the British filmmaker who helmed ‘Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason’ was cooling her heels in India like any other backpacker, travelling by bus, going from one little town to another.

Last weekend, Beeban Kidron was in Chennai. “It’s a private visit,” she begins the interview. “I just got back after visiting schools around Belgaum and Mangalore, Karnataka.”

So, did she find material for a film based in India like her countrymen did with Slumdog Millionaire?

She laughs. “I’m a friend of the writer Simon Beaufoy. I am very pleased with its success. I am very interested in the debate going on here about the film. You know, in a year when there have not been too many entertaining movies, it is fantastically entertaining as a movie. So whatever smaller issues there are, I think we have to celebrate Slumdog. I am a filmmaker, so I am always looking for material.”

Her latest film ‘Hippie Hippie Shake’ is based on the memoir by Richard Neville, the editor of Oz, who along with his staff was put on trial in the sixties for bringing out a sexually explicit issue, after the radical Australian satirical magazine launched in London.

“The film is in post-production. Most of the characters shown in the film are still alive and the producers are keen to show them the film and sort everything out. Which is why I am suddenly free and had a month to do something very, very different,” she says explaining her Indian holiday.

Beeban Kidron strongly believes in education that delivers inspiration rather than just literacy. That’s the reason she founded FilmClub along with her friend Lindsay Mackie. “People communicate through the telling of stories, not through literacy. There’s a lack of aspiration, a big problem among children. Hundred years of cinema from around the world is a great tool. The idea behind the FilmClub is to share stories. From Duck Soup to Hotel Rwanda, movies that are not on anybody’s radar are changing their lives. I have 30,000 to 40,000 children in these clubs and I am going seven times that number in two years from now. When someone has something to dream of, something to aspire for… if they can imagine something, then they can work towards it.”

Five years after the Bridget Jones sequel, how does she look back at the film?

“You know it’s great to make a movie that’s so enormous. I love Renee Zellwegger. She’s a fabulous person but more than that, she’s a really, really talented actress. I do feel that if movies were made they were in the 1950s where we had fantastic roles for women and they banged them out instead of rolling out one every two years, she would have been our Betty Davis, she would’ve been one of the women who would’ve dominated our cinema.”

The film opened to scathing reviews but the $70 million on to gross over $262 million.

“Yes, the critics weren’t kind. There were some things I wanted in the movie that came out and there were things I didn’t want that went in but when you make a big movie, you don’t control the last mile. It’s a deal you make with the devil. As a director, when you make a film at that level, you know there are a lot of vested interests. But millions of people saw the film, millions enjoyed the film. The critics were bound to hate a film that was going to cash in on the success of the first film. How could they not hate it?”

The big films she does give her the access to do the small things she wants to do – like the FilmClub or her last documentary project, Antony Gormley: Making Space. “It took me nine months to make that film about a sculptor who wasn’t known and had a thin audience. Hippie Hippie Shake is more mass-based. It’s about freedom, about the sixties, about standing up… the accidental hero sort of a thing. It’s Cillian Murphy’s film really. But I like doing both.”

So films like Bridget Jones are necessary evil?

“Thank you very much. You want to end my career? I’m on holiday,” she laughs. “It was a privilege and a pleasure to do Bridget Jones. Being in the mainstream gives me the opportunity to open another door.”

She doesn’t believe in the notion of cinema being different in the West and here in India. “It’s just that Bollywood uses a language alien to us. Danny Boyle took the Bollywood idiom and gave it to us in a language we understood, made it more sort of naturalistic and look at the response. Also, the idea of that film is very strong. You measure your population in billions. Imagine the competitiveness. The notion of the competition holding you back is very political. I saw Mother India a few years ago. And it was one of the greatest films I’ve seen in my life. I don’t think I’ve seen anything like that again.”

She begins another anecdote about Gordon Brown talking to the students of the FilmClub when he was the Chancellor. “He gave them the normal politician speech and told them he had just been to India and had met this huge Indian star… I forget his name (probably Amitabh Bachchan) and suddenly, the room went ‘Woohooooo’. It was amazing to see that kind of response. Bollywood may not be the dominant thing for the chattering classes in London but in that place, in that classroom, on that day, there was no “West” in that sense. We are all closer than we know.”

Luck By Chance: Rock On, Akhtars!

February 5, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Drama

Director: Zoya Akhtar

Cast: Farhan Akhtar, Konkona Sen, Rishi Kapoor, Dimple Kapadia, Isha Sharvani, Sanjay Kapoor, Hrithik Roshan

Storyline: Two struggling actors try to make it big in Bollywood and discover a few truths about life at the dream factory.

Bottomline: One of the best films of our times.

 

First, thank you God, for letting Zoya make this movie before Bhandarkar got a chance to apply his formula of realism and show us his take on the film industry.

Luck By Chance, from the house of the Akhtars, is one of the best macroscopic films of all time. And, a fantastic ‘micro’ film too that goes behind the scenes of industry-associated clichés to give us an insight behind common myths and machinations of the film industry.

It works magic simply because this is not just an exercise to simply critique the business (the Bhandarkar brand of innocents eaten by the big bad wolf of an industry – Chandni Bar, Page 3, Corporate, Traffic Signal, Fashion, Jail and so on) but it does make some earnestly solid points while painting us the larger picture.

This isn’t just a spoof or a parody (like Bollywood Calling or King of Bollywood), though the subtlety of the satire is too delicious to ignore. This isn’t a shameless celebration (like Om Shanti Om or Jaaneman) but it still pays tribute to the workforce. This isn’t an overtly indulgent, romanticised look at the people behind the scenes either (like Sudhir Mishra’s Khoya Khoya Chand).

Zoya does to our cinema what Cameron Crowe did to rock with his largely autobiographical ‘Almost Famous’. And, this is no less a film than Crowe’s masterpiece while giving us a ringside view of the dream factory and the beauty of Zoya’s effort is that she also takes us intimately close and deep into the minds of all those who are a part of it. She sets up her characters as a silent observer, reveals their dilemmas and lets character come out of actions and decisions than just dialogue.

Zoya refuses to judge them – whether it’s the producer who sleeps with his starlet or the struggler who gets seduced by the newfound glamour of the business – and it’s these shades of grey that always make characters fascinating and seem so real.

Right from writing and casting, this film is one stroke of genius after another, especially with the way the filmmaker has chosen to employ her guest artistes from Aamir Khan at the start to Shah Rukh Khan at the end. Hrithik needs to be lauded to play a role so close to his real self that many a time, the lines between Hrithik Roshan and Zafar Khan seem blurred.

But it is Zoya’s eye for detail and sensitivity as a filmmaker  that sets her apart from the rest of the Bollywood brigade. Sample, the quick glance of a worn-out shoe sported by a struggler at the audition or the ease with which the protagonist lies that he does not have a girlfriend with a nubile star-daughter in his bedroom and his subsequent encounter with his girlfriend.

Farhan Akhtar is a class apart and establishes himself as one of the finest actors around, employing intensity and understatement to make up for projection and energy demanded of the job though it would’ve been nice to see him go over the top in the film within the film. It’s a delight to see Rishi Kapoor revel in his role of an old-fashioned, good-hearted superstitious producer and the ever-fantastic Dimple is borderline self-deprecatory, playing the star-mom and bringing the house down with her ‘Oh-I’m-still-the-most-beautiful-woman-in-the room’ antics.

Isha Sharvani’s innocence, radiance and sex appeal make her instantly edible and the girl’s come a long way from the ‘Tarzan-dance’ days of Kisna. Konkana’s performance makes us want to give her a long, warm hug and strangely, you even feel Sanjay Kapoor is capable of being a decent actor, given the right filmmaker and role.

Right from cinematography (Carlos Catalan) to Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy’s music to art direction (Abid T.P), Luck by Chance seems to be put together by a dream crew. Maybe it’s destiny or just pure luck that everything comes together so well.

This ode to Bollywood is the must-watch film of the season.

And, Javed Saab, thank you for giving us your kids. They continue to rock on.

Tammannah: Main Madhuri Dixit Banna Chahti Hoon

February 1, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Happy Days are here for Miss Padikaathavan, who did her Kalloori when she was still in school.

Soon, we will get to see this Ayan actor opposite Suriya do her Ananda Thandavam. We will then see her with that Paiyya, Karthi.

Tammannah is also doing the Jab We Met remake with Bharath, Raja Rani. The teen will soon turn Queen, backed with a little love and a little hard work (Konjam Ishtam, Konjam Kashtam in Telugu). She has no dates till July, we learn.

“When I began, I had hoped that someday, my schedule would be this busy. I am enjoying the pace,” she says.

No surprise considering that’s a quick learner. “For my 12th exam, I got 64 per cent. People spend a whole year studying for it. All I had was barely 15 days to prepare. So yeah!” she grins.

Having made her debut at 13 and a half (no kidding, she played the leading lady) in Hindi, this child prodigy has been living out of suitcases at Hotel Green Park for four years now. And now, she’s doing B.A. Economics by correspondence.

“Yes, I don’t get to attend college like the other kids. But I think I am doing something more interesting, something I am very passionate about. Beside since my Mom’s or somebody from my family is always with me, the emotional support has been great.”

Growing up, whose shoes did she want to get into?

“Madhuri Dixit was somebody I always looked up to,” she says flashing that 1000-watt smile she seems to have perfected from her role model. “Some people say that I look like her. When I was 13-14, I didn’t know I was going to look like her someday. But now, I feel that I have to be me, I have to search within and find myself.”

Girls from the North have always made it big here.

“Maybe because there are many more girls in Bombay and Delhi who have grown up on Bollywood and they see it as a career option. Here, I am not sure if people see acting as a career choice.”

Tammannah realises that in a male-dominated industry, she has to strike a balance.

“I can say I have been fortunate to get films like Happy Days, Kalloori, Ananda Thandavam, Paiyya, Konjam Ishtam Konjam Kashtam and commercial films like Padikathavan and Ayan. I want to do a little bit of both… Like the ‘Jab We Met’ role in Raja Rani. Indian cinema is male dominated. I understand that, I am OK with that but I want to do my own thing.”

Which is why though her Dad manages her career and Mom accompanies her to shoots, she’s the one who chooses the scripts herself in an industry where nothing is hard-bound.

“I’ve always been a given a pretty decent narration about what the film is about. That gives me a more instinctive view. Sometimes, the narration is too vague and sometimes, it is vivid.”

What if the script changes as they shoot, a common phenomenon in Tamil cinema?

“As for any actor, it all depends on how grave the change is. For example, I don’t do kissing scenesI it’s there in my contract. So, all of a sudden the director can’t decide to add a kissing scene. But, my directors have been very professional. I understand when my scenes have to be taken out when they are killing the pace of the film.”

She believes that learning on the job is the real thing.

“I was into theatre for eight to nine months when I started out. I did experimental theatre. I have performed on stage and I am sure trained actors do more than that but I’ve been lucky to work with fantastic directors like Sekher Kammula, Balaji Sakthivel and K.V. Anand early on in my career.”

Being young, does she ever feel intimidated?

“When I first acted with Suriya, I was very nervous during the first two or three days. I am a huge fan. I could not believe I was working with him. But when the camera starts rolling, you even forget who you are. You have to become someone else.”

Tammannah doesn’t let criticism bother her either. “A review is a perception of one person. Films are meant for people and different people have different takes. My critics are Mum and Dad, I take them very seriously and they give me honest feedback.”

Tanvi: A Dose of Vitamin T

January 16, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

After Slumdog Millionaire won four at the Who’s Going Home With The Golden Globes, we make Tanvi, who sang two songs including the much-acclaimed ‘Jai Ho’ for Danny Boyle’s masterpiece, take the hotseat and shoot a few questions of our own.

“Why are you talking to me,” she shoots back. “Talk to Rahman. It’s his time,” she adds, quite flummoxed by the fact that her phone hasn’t stopped ringing since. She wonders why. “Life has changed. Suddenly, people are calling me. But, I’m glad my hard work is paying off.”

She had no idea that she was driving towards a life-changing twist, on her way to Rahman’s studio to sing some backing vocals for a song that she thought was meant for Subhash Ghai’s ‘Yuvraaj.’

“I went in a heard Sukhi’s voice and I was in awe of the notes he hit. And Rahman said: Go in and try something different. Think out of the box. Throw your voice out loud like no one’s around to listen. I couldn’t believe he wanted me to sing and the challenge was that I had to match up to Sukhi.”

Tanvi also wrote the Spanish bits for the song, given her knack of adapting to demands of songs that require foreign sounds. In the past five years of singing for Rahman since she did backing vocals for Fana in Yuva (“It was on May 13, 2003,” she remembers), she had been to the studio for all kinds of singing.

“I love doing backing vocals for him because every time I go in, I come out learning something new,” says the singer who also officially trained under Augustine Paul.

Apart from ‘Jai Ho,’ she joined BlaaZe for Gangsta Blues for Slumdog. “Rahman’s brief was simple. He said: Go wild.”

After that initial burst of easy questions, we shift to the million dollar ones: Having followed and worked with Rahman for the last five years, does she truly believe that Slumdog Millionaire is his best work till date?

“My favourite is Rang De Basanti and Bose – The Forgotten Hero. This particular score is good no doubt but I’ve heard better from him. But that’s because from an Indian audience point of view, we’ve heard so much. I don’t think Hollywood has heard his music. Take Bombay, Thiruda Thiruda, Iruvar, Guru or Bose and the scores he has given for those films… If you listen to Azaadi or Jaage, you will get goose bumps. Or Swades and Lagaan. You put all these songs on one side and then you put Slumdog and what do you think? Recently, we worked on this movie called Ada. That movie, you must listen to the choir. It was a super duper difficult piece. I’ve noticed in the last couple of years, he wants to push himself trying out new sounds. He would say: I want a Bulgarian voice, I want a screaming voice, I want to hear Andalucian mountain women, I want a high pitched voice, I want a whisper that breaks into a full-throated voice and then go nasal.”

That’s where singers like Tanvi come in to play.

“I can give Soprano, Tenor, Base and Alto all by myself. There are times when I’ve done that but there’s an amazing chemistry when we sing in a choir. Jai Ho was done in a couple of hours,” she recollects.

Tanvi only realised that the song was going to be used for Slumdog much later.

“I went in for some recording and I asked him out of curiosity if he had retained my voice in Jai Ho?” And he’s like “Of course. Gangsta Blues also. I was like “Thank you, Thank you, Thank You. I was so happy. After five or six years, you get to sing for a Hollywood movie, would I be excited? Hell, yeah. Now that the film has won four Golden Globes, I feel elated, I feel happy and I’m glad that I’m at least .25 per cent of it.”

Tanvi also sings for Yuvan, Premgi, Srikant Deva, GV Prakash. “I’ve done quite a bit of work with Yuvan,” says the singer who can sing in 14-15 different languages.

“Whatever I am today, it is because of Rahman. Four things I learnt from him: Dedication, Determination, Patience and to be humble. Without these, you can never grow.”

And yes, like most of India, she’s yet to watch Slumdog Millionaire herself. “I’ll watch on the 23rd when it releases.”

 The Business Woman

“I have my own business. I have been doing interior design for the last one and a half years. And my jewellery line is out. It’s called Exotic Store. I wanted to give a funky name like Vitamin T. Someday, I am going to do a song and Vitamin T is going to come out.

If I keep singing, you tend to lose it. You need a distraction. I am lucky to have two professions. I just put my heart and soul in whatever I do because I realised life is too short. If I don’t do it now, when the hell would I do it?”

Flashback – Life before singing

“I did Masters in Ceramics and I didn’t like it much there in the US as a graphic designer in the World Bank. I came back in 2003. Life in the US is monotonous. You are working Monday to Friday like a dog. And you only get to meet up with friends on Saturdays. They drink and wake up with a hangover on Sunday. Someday, you have to do your groceries, laundry… You are not saving any money. All your money goes off on credit card, shopping, parking. When I was there, I would just sit by Georgetown (in Washington DC) and keep sketching because I was an art student.”

Memories of Madras: K. Balachander – When Directors Wore The Pants

January 15, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

It was around 1950 that I first came to Madras as an apprentice clerk in the Accountant General’s office. I have been living in Madras since. I am unable to call it Chennai. Old habits die hard.

In those days, we were used to talking only in English. Even today, when we try to slip into Tamil, it is very difficult to cut short the usage of English words.

Madras has played a tremendous role in my career. It gave me a platform. I used to participate in skits, cultural programmes and the farewell parties at the AG’s office.

Major Chandrakant was done in English because the AG was from Bengal. I myself did the role of the Major.

Later on, I developed it into a two-hour play for the Sabhas and Sunderrajan did the Major’s role. All his life he was called only Major Sunderrajan.

It played at Mylapore Fine Arts Club. People like Cho and other oldsters in theatre owe our allegiance to Mr.Rajagopal of the Club who used to encourage drama and theatre.

The rivalry was between professionals and non-professionals. The professionals at that time included TK Shanmugham, S.Ve.Sahasranamam and Sivaji Ganesan too had a troupe. But our troupes made of non-professionals were called amateur dramatic troupes.

The response was excellent, there was no disturbance from cable TV or satellite. Though it was not profitable, it was satisfying.

We used to put 50 rupees each and make a play. We would’ve spent about 600-700 rupees to make Major Chandrakant. We would receive about 200 rupees from the sabha after a lot of bargaining. But the thrill kept us going.

The film business was as disorganised as it was as it is today. We had more discipline then. The producers those days were sound producers – take SS Vasan, AVM, Nagi Reddy or L.V.Prasad… Jupiter Movies, Modern Theatres had their own studios, they were sound producers. Today, people who have call sheet of stars become producers overnight.

Opportunity came in the shape of MGR who wanted me to write. He had Hindi film with him, and we had to make changes because it was MGR. MGR is a phenomenon, you can afford to make a mistake with MGR. If you have to make a film for him, you have to write it like it was MGR’s dialogue not like a character’s dialogue. Today, every star wants that.

Even Sivaji did not dictate terms to anybody. Once he has accepted the story, he would simply obey the director. I did one film with him. He was very co-operative. With MGR, I would have to buckle. It was difficult for me. So later on, when I was asked to do an MGR film, I wriggled out of it giving some silly reason. MGR knew that.

I had decided to be independent and have my own identity. I thought I will take the cause of women and have my own identity and it was something not explored by any director. I would sit in a small room in my rented house and discuss it with my friends at the beach.

As a bachelor, I lived in Mambalam and then, in Triplicane and after getting married, I shifted to Gopalapuram third street, one street away from the CM’s house. Even then, Kalaignar was a big hero for me. I used to pass that way just to see him.

The Gopalapuram playground was a popular hangout after six p.m. Otherwise, we would spend time with friends by the Marina or Elliots Beach. We never went to restaurants or cafes because it was a question of money. Minerva was the only small AC theatre around showing English films. I saw most of the black and white classics at the Elphinstone Theatre.

Our social lives revolved around discussing theatre.

No, I did not have a girlfriend. Romance or love was not discussed. It was not our cup of tea. It is something which is divine and I could not afford to have it.

On today’s roads, everybody seems to be a romantic. Those days, it was possible only among a certain group of boys and girls. You can only see them, write about them and imagine how they feel but we couldn’t do it ourselves.

Of course, when I was in college, we used to pine for girls but that was not love. Just a sneaky glance and that’s where it ended.

Nobody ever knew who was loving who. Affairs were always kept a secret and there were few and far between.

Divorces too were rare and women rarely stepped outside the family system which is why some believe I was ahead of my time in dealing with stories like ‘Arangetram.’

* * *

K.Balachander

Born in 1930, the veteran filmmaker came to Madras in 1950 from a small hamlet near Tanjore. Though theatre started as a hobby, he was all consumed by his passion for storytelling and emerged as the critically acclaimed auteur who gave Tamil Cinema two of its biggest stars – Rajnikant and Kamal Hassan.

His banner ‘Kavithalaya’ continues to churn out blockbusters till date as the man himself has taken over the small screen over the past decade.

I remember:

In the night, if I spotted a policeman, I would get off and walk along my bicycle. My cycle didn’t have a dynamo. It was costly.

I would get back on the seat only when he’s out of sight.

One day, the policeman laughed at me.

Out of habit, I had got off even during daytime. 

Page 22 of 88 « Previous 1 … 20 21 22 23 24 … 88 Next »
  • Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar