• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • December 2025
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
    « Dec    
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Browsing Category Archives

Website under construction.

Ranvir, Vinay aur That Four Letter Word

October 20, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

This happens to be our most fun experience on national television and the most embarassing one. The talk show with Ranvir and Vinay was a blast. It was recorded on the same day as the India-Pakistan T20 final.

Cary and me were in the dressing room watching the last two overs of the match before the show trying not to get stressed out by the fact that we hardly spoke Hindi, only to get all the more stressed by that high-tension thriller…

As the Pakistanis needed 13 of the last over, the entire crew of Ranvir Vinay aur Kaun including the hosts stormed into the green room. And you can imagine the excitement.

Even the normally cricket-indifferent Cary was all hooked to it and Ranvir turned cynical after the six. But soon Misbah hit the shot he will never ever try again all his life as Sreesanth caught it and the room erupted with screams and celebrations…

What a way to start the shoot…

Yes, it was a sentimental shoot for Cary, Ranvir and me because Ranvir had been part of the film since 2002 ever since I met him and Cary for an interview when they were both VJs. We had come a full circle and now Ranvir was interviewing us.

Truly an honour!

Thank you Ranvir Paaji and Vinay… You made us feel at home and never have we enjoyed digs at us more!

And thanks Darshan, for being the official TFLW TV show tracker/recorder.

There’s more on That Four Letter Word at the official site.

Just out: Reviews of Bhool Bhulaiyaa, Laaga Chunari, etc.

October 19, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

Just found time to post online my reviews of Bhool Bhulaiyaa, Laaga Chunari Mein Daag and Licence to Wed, Wrong Turn and Resident Evil 3: Extinction.

You check out these reviews and more on my movie blog.

Bhool Bhulaiyaa: The case of the missing marbles!

October 18, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

Director: Priyadarshan
Cast: Akshay Kumar, Shiney Ahuja, Vidya Balan, Ameesha Patel
Storyline: A newly-wed couple try to dispel notions of a ghost in their haunted mansion only to find themselves caught in its spell.
Bottomline: Priyadarshan loses it in translation
Genre: Thriller


If bad remakes amounted to murder, Priyadarshan’s a serial killer going by his track record, box-office figures notwithstanding.

How bad a filmmaker should you be to stay so faithful to the screenplay of the Malayalam original ‘Manichitrathazhu’ and yet churn out such horror?

At least if the filmmaker had to deal with changes/touches/twists to the tale, you could’ve blamed it on the screenwriter. But here’s a film that stays as close as possible to the screenplay of the much-acclaimed classic and yet falters, purely because of its execution. By execution, I also mean CAPITAL punishment for us viewers.

It is an ordeal to sit through the first one hour of ‘Bhool Bhulaiyaa’ and its attempt at comedy. Because, in this segment, even the usually dependable Paresh Rawal’s timing is all bollocks and you end up giggling only when you are supposed to be scared.

While the original was rooted in a credible rural milieu with an endearingly believable bunch of village simpletons who are convinced about the presence of a ghost, Priyadarshan’s take is filled with his regular inventory of caricatures – Rajpal Yadav in yet another ‘Chottey’ avatar, Paresh Rawal bumbling around like an idiot, Asrani hamming it up… you get the picture?

Add to this, there’s the phenomenally expressionless Ameesha Patel to hoot at.

Akshay finally makes his entry ten minutes before interval and gives you something to look forward to: The over-priced popcorn.

Jokes apart, Akshay is the only entertaining proposition of the film, using his seasoned comic flair to keep the proceedings light, carrying what’s left of the film on his able shoulders. Vidya Balan has two left feet and Shiney Ahuja’s sincerity shows in the scene where he breaks down. What a long way he has come since Sins.

Where Bhool Bhulaiyaa fails and Manichitrathazhu scores, is in the filmmaker’s ability (or inability, in this case) to set up a face-off between science and superstition. Fazil played a gripping mind-game with us keeping us guessing on what was causing all hell to break loose – was it really the ghost or was it someone with a dissociative identity disorder?

There were many cues thrown around in Manichitrathazhu, some to mislead, some to distract and some to hint and help you participate in the guessing game. For all his claim to have worked on the film, Priyadarshan doesn’t even seem to have got hold of the basic idea behind the film: a science-meets-superstition-based-thriller where parapsychology and exorcism flow seamlessly into the narrative.

While we can understand P.Vasu’s commercial considerations that made him ignore these finer aspects and just dumb it down as a Superstar film for the masses, Priyadarshan’s claim of being faithful to the original is superficial and unreal, just like the film he has made.

‘Bhool Bhulaiyaa’ is yet another example of a classic lost in translation, another victim of Priyadarshan’s obsessive compulsive urge to make a career out of other people’s films with only buffoonery for a USP.

http://sudermovies.blogspot.com

Laaga Chunari Main Daag: Didi’s Tragedy Show, Rom-Com style

October 18, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Drama
Director: Pradeep Sarkar
Cast: Rani Mukerji, Konkana Sen Sharma, Kunal Kapoor, Abhishek Bachchan
Storyline: Small town girl goes to big bad Mumbai and becomes an escort.
Bottomline: Sarkar’s sense of feminism goes hanky-panky, with special emphasis on the hanky.

There are moments in the film where Pradeep Sarkar breaks the predictability associated with the stock-story with a few new touches.

Like the bit when she does not take the money the first time she gets a ‘daag’ on her chunari. She slaps the guy instead. Like the part where she chooses to do it on her terms and in style instead of signing up for Madhur Bhandarkar’s Chandni Bar-girl’s desperation of doing it for pocket change. Like the point that she always has an
exit-route option open, throughout the film.
These touches are the only saving grace of a film that tries hard to be a feminist take on the issue but fails due to one basic flaw: The fact that she goes through all this in an attempt to be the “son” her father wanted and in the end, her exit from this path is guaranteed only by the entry of the son-in-laws, the family’s new male
protectors.

This ruins everything.

Maybe this is Pradeep Sarkar’s way of telling us that this candy-floss pseudo-feminism is a picture perfect reflection of our times where morality as defined by the rich and the famous differs from the morality of the middle-class. Once you’ve made the jump who cares what others say? Love is all that matters. Perfect for the multiplex-goer sensibility.

It does not squeeze the sentiment enough to dampen your hanky. Nor is it bitter-sweet. At best, it’s a feel-good tragedy.

It’s not an author-backed role for any of the characters, so you are wondering why Jaya Bachchan’s name appears first in the credits. Maybe because the director wanted to keep his promise of writing a role tailor-made for her, he literally just keeps her going at the sewing machine day and night. You didn’t get the metaphor? Without her putting the stitches on the petticoats, the family’s fortune would be reduced to rags.

Wait, there are more. From the predictable Ganga of the Benaras epitomising the purity of the protagonist to the deteriorating condition of the family (through father’s health) and their ancestral home, literally, to the stack of falling chips to the professional courtesan’s in-your-face assessment of Rani’s innocence, every thing is spelt out that it would be no surprise if the next film from the Yash Raj Banner has arrow-pointers and footnotes explaining the motifs and metaphors employed to make the film artistically richer.

This need to spell out everything probably only emerges because every situation, character and location is bathed in the Yash Raj-banner-sensibility of manufacturing cinema – good-looking people in great looking clothes singing and dancing around in gorgeous locations.

Thanks to the picture perfect cinematography we hardly know that their palatial nest was supposed to be on the verge of ruins as the dialogue suggests.

There’s nothing visually dirty about the job she takes up – we see her get herself a makeover, strut around in the best of clothes, fly business class to Zurich and almost do a Dilwale Dulhaniya all over again. And, we are supposed to feel sorry for her? The sensibility demanded of the screenplay is the biggest casualty of the Yash Raj Films stylization.

Konkana’s chirpiness borders on annoying but blame that on the dumb thing she plays. Rani has a cakewalk of a role that demands no more than her Mona Lisa smile and she ‘sleeps’ through it, not sure what to do in the bedroom scenes.

The film is so old-school that it is refreshing to see Kunal Kapoor improvise with a burger, spilling mayonnaise on his shirt and provide the film its romantic comedy moments. Abhishek Bachchan with all of 15 minutes of screen-time banks on charm and chemistry with his not-so-Babli pair this time.

The only reason it is worth catching on TV is that it takes every single cliché from the genre of the past and juxtaposes it with updated contemporary, modern-day reactions which have become clichés too.

Sample: How the sister comes to know about her ‘job’: Cliché. How she reacts to it: New age cliche. How the family comes to know: Cliché. How they react to it: New-age cliche. How the boy comes to know: Cliché. How he reacts to it: New-age Romantic Comedy cliche.

These sort of twists against the tragedy genre work, but only in a Sooraj Barjatya-kind of a way.

http://sudermovies.blogspot.com

One Minute Reviews

October 18, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

Licence to Wed:
Cast: Robin Williams, Mandy Moore, John Krasinski
Director: Ken Kwapis
Storyline: A lovey-dovey couple decides to take a marriage preparatory course and find the Reverend to be a bone in the kebab.
Ups: The chick-flick mood, the romantic comedy with some genuinely funny moments, Robin Williams and his adorable sidekick minister-kid, Mandy Moore’s appeal that helps her skip through yet another role bravely without the skill better known as acting and John, who seems to be a natural.
Downs: Predictable like any film in the genre, uni-dimensional characters, completely unbelievable Reverend… Bugging apartments of couples to crackdown on their sex life? Only Robin Williams could’ve made this work.
Bottomline: Perfect date movie but if you are dreading the M-word, don’t take her for this one.

Wrong Turn:
Cast: Desmond Harrington, Eliza Dushku
Director: Rob Schmidt
Storyline: A bunch of friends trespass into Cannibal-zombie-land and end up playing hide and seek with death.
Ups: Hot babes who you know will last longest in the film, plenty of thrills, jump-scenes, scary moments and a credible landscape.
Downs: For a film that came out in 2003, even the sequel is out on DVD. Not an iota of class or subtlety, highly predictable plotline and why don’t the zombies just eat the hot ones like they did with the boys instead of taking them captive? Oh, wait, that’s a no-brainer.
Bottomline: Awesome B-movie stuff.

Resident Evil 3:
Cast: Milla Jovovich, Ali Larter, Ashanti
Director: Russell Mulcahy
Storyline: The survivors of Part 2 need to head to Alaska before they are eaten up by ugly zombie creatures and crows.
Ups: Milla Jovovich, Ali Larter, many more Milla Jovovichs in her favourite choice of wardrobe in the series: None. Come on, why else would anyone watch this series that looks like a videogame?
Downs: What on the planet is happening? Something that went wrong because of Umbrella Corporation’s classified confidential project.
Bottomline: Only for Milla fans or addicts of the game.

http://sudermovies.blogspot.com

That Four Letter in Mumbai

October 15, 2007 · by sudhishkamath


CNN-IBN and Rajeev Masand were quite sweet to us by covering the release of the film at Fun Cinemas. Rajeev also called me to their studios for a quick chat on independent cinema. Take a look. And thank you, Varsha! 🙂

CNN-IBN: That Four Letter Word in Mumbai

October 10, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

CNN-IBN and Rajeev Masand were quite sweet to us by covering the release of the film at Fun Cinemas. Rajeev also called me to their studios for a quick chat on independent cinema. Take a look. And thank you, Varsha! 🙂

Return of the Jewel Thief

October 10, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

Vijay Anand has a worthy successor.

Sriram Raghavan, the brains behind the dark taut thriller Ek Hasina Thi and the phenomenally acclaimed ‘Johnny Gaddaar’ quoting Tarantino (“I steal from every film”) recently in an article went on to give a complete list of his ‘Reservoir Gods,’ ranging from John Huston’s ‘The Asphalt Jungle’ to Kubrick’s ‘The Killing’ to Jules Dassin’s ‘Rififi’ to the modern day interpreters of the genre: Coen Brothers and Tarantino to Vijay Anand’s suspense-filled thrillers (‘Teesri Manzil,’ ‘Jewel Thief,’ ‘Johnny Mera Naam’) to Jyoti Swaroop’s ‘Parwana,’ and ended it on a note saying: “I hope I have managed to steal something from them.”

The master thief did. And so smoothly that you would find nothing unoriginal about ‘Johnny Gaddaar,’ one of the best homage films ever made. (Read my review of the film here.)

Not every filmmaker exposes his influences to critics who are just waiting to spot the reference.

In a detailed exclusive interview over email, Raghavan explains:

“When I wrote the piece about the movies that influenced and inspired me, it was not some sort of confession. The movies I listed are great films, by great directors. When I began Johnny Gaddaar, I wanted to imbibe some of the qualities that made those films so rich and layered. My plot is not based on any of the films. Of course, the genre will have some elements in common. Femme fatales, corrupt cops, double crossers, infidelity and so on.

Likewise every film set in a jail like Ek Hasina Thi will have common elements. Shawshank Redemption, Midnight Express, Escape from Alcatraz, Birdman of Alcatraz, The Great Escape, Lock up, Double Jeopardy are all such different films. But they will have at least half dozen common situations.

I see a fairly THICK line between homage, inspiration and plagiarism. I mean, what’s the point of copying a scene ditto…where’s the fun and challenge in it.”

Unfortunately, for Raghavan, the film did not have the best of openings and the film couldn’t stay on till the word of mouth spread. ‘Johnny Gaddaar’ averaged three and a half stars on five from over a dozen reviews around the country but the box office can be cruel.

What went wrong?

“Jaideep Sahni asked one ticket seller in a hall, how is the picture? He had an interesting answer. He said, picture zabardast hai, audience bekar hai.

But, I wont blame the audiences. Why would anyone risk paying 150-200 rupees on a weekend to see a film with a new actor? Unless…they know it’s a damn good film. I would have loved it but I did not expect a huge opening for the film. I was confident that those who saw it would like it and spread the word. That’s exactly what is happening. But the press has been extremely positive and so too various people in the film fraternity. The word of mouth is strong and the second weekend collections are better than the first.

Also most movies made today expect the viewer to leave his brains at home. Johnny demands the viewer pay attention. That’s the way I like to watch thrillers, all movies actually.

I do feel we should have had some innovative marketing strategy. We did promote the film to our best but certain movies need strong marketing ideas. Hitchcock announced during the release of Pyscho that no viewer would be allowed in the hall once the movie began. Also he had an ambulance outside every theatre in case someone got a heart attack. These gimmicks create curiousity and then if the film is good too, there’s no stopping it. Pyscho was his most inexpensive film but his biggest hit.”

We decide to let him refute a little criticism that he’s got from critics around the country. That the police is near absent during the proceedings. That you have “over-written” and “over-directed” the film. That it is the first comprehensive spot the movie reference exercise.

“Ok….one by one. The lead characters are shrewd criminals so they’d definitely ensure that their misdeeds don’t attract the police. In fact one of the main characters is a corrupt cop!! I could have shown cops doing some sundry investigations but it’s not relevant to my story. The story takes place over just 2-3 days and I’m sure the cops would get into the picture once they find the bodies…but by then, the movie is over.

I don’t understand what over written and over directed mean. Need examples to answer that. Really. I can understand over acting. Or over dose of violence..but how can you overwrite a film. Do the critics mean it’s too verbose? Or have I taken strange angles and bizarre show off kind of shots?

Spot the references….Well…I feel the references are vital to the movie’s screenplay. I mean the various clips I’ve shown are carrying the plot of Johnny Gaddaar forward. The lead guy gets his caper idea from an old Amitabh Bachchan movie. The characters speak about movies like Scarface and Black…but why not? Don’t we all refer to movies in our day to day conversations. People have love it. It’s all meant for fun…and offsets the dark and nasty things that happen in the movie.”


Raghavan’s finest quality as a filmmaker is how he observes and learns techniques from the films he watches.

The characterisation in Johnny Gaddaar would make you believe it was a script the Coen Brothers wrote. Is that what he stole from them – the art of creating memorably real characters?

“I love the Coen Brothers work. My favourites are Millers Crossing, Blood Simple and Fargo. Fargo has a pregnant cop in charge of the investigation. It was not necessary to the script but it lends the character an emotional reality and quirky appeal. Nine out of ten heroines in India would throw me out if I suggested such a thing to them. But Francis McDormand did a super job and even won an Oscar for the performance. While making Johnny, I and my writers kept brainstorming on how to make the characters somewhat real so that they connect with viewers even though they are racketeers. Also I must thank my actors who brought their own inputs and experiences to give shades to the roles that were not so fleshed out in the script.”

We then talk a little about the fantastic score that was nostalgic enough to give us the goose-bumps.The title sequence was pure nostalgia for the Hindi film freak.

“All credit for the soundtrack goes to Shankar Ehsaan Loy and my background music composer Daniel George. Actually we had no scope for conventional songs in the movie. And yet I love music and wanted a lot of music in the film. So we asked SEL to do a title song which we could use in a crucial scene as background. I loved the song so much that I persuaded them to take time out and compose two more numbers. They are used very briefly in the film and to really enjoy it, you got to listen to the CD. It’s an eclectic album.”

And then, he belts out the references of his learning again:

“A good thriller needs a terrific background score. Imagine Pyscho or Taxi Driver without Bernard Hermann’s tracks. Or Untouchables without Ennio Morricone.

The JG score has been composed by Daniel B George. We have done some experimenting here…. The BG score was majorly conceived on live performances and recorded on an analog machine. We tried to stay away from the digital environment which is in right now.

The tympanis, brass, violins were all recorded live. The approach has actually been to record music like it was done back in the 70s. It was a long and arduous and comparatively expensive process but the quality will be discernible to the audience.

I thoroughly enjoyed the experience and had the privilege to work with musicians like Franco Vaz, who’ve actually played for RD Burman, Kalyanji Anandji and other greats.”

His next project with Saif Ali Khan, Agent Vinod sounds like another throwback to a bygone era. Is that another homage film?

“Agent Vinod is a realistic thriller set in the world of current day espionage. The script is still being honed so it’s too early to speak about the plot etc. But it’s not like the James Bond spoofs that Hindi movies had successfully attempted. I mean, it’s not Farz or Suraksha or even the Rajshri production Agent Vinod starring Mahendra Sandhu.

We will have no scene like the Chief of Intelligence hears about some disaster and says Call Vinod. And we cut to Vinod in bed with a buxom beauty and his watch goes beeeep.

Yes, there will be thrills and shocks and action set pieces but more in a believable mould. I loved the recent Casino Royale and Bourne Ultimatum. Again, I’ve to think of an interesting way to weave music as you cant have a spy in these times, singing and romancing a girl over the Niagara Falls. Or can we??”

The way he talks so much about movies other than his, he’s on his way to earn the Desi Tarantino tag.

“Desi Tarantino sounds too funny,” he says.

“And I hope that every film I do will not be like this. I get influenced by so many styles of filmmaking and yet somewhere, I hope I can make films for our audiences, and on my terms.

The next film I’m doing is an offbeat love story. I’m still working on the script and it’s not even titled. But on my comp, I’ve put down that the treatment should be something like Run Lola Run meets Three Colours Blue. What does that mean? I don’t know myself. Filmmaking is a process of discovery and adventure which is what makes it nerve wracking… and fun too.”

Johnny Gaddaar: Are you game?

October 5, 2007 · by sudhishkamath


Genre: Thriller
Director: Sriram Raghavan
Cast: Neil Nitin Mukesh, Dharmendra, Vinay Pathak, Rimii Sen
Storyline: A con betrays his gang during a two-and-a-half crore deal.
Bottomline: A slick, riveting, intelligent game of cards.

Finally, someone’s demonstrated the difference between tribute and plagiarism.
Johnny Gaddaar though derivative of many schools of filmmaking across genres and sensibilities (right from James Hadley Chase to the Coen Brothers to Vijay Anand to Steven Soderberg), still comes out trumps in a delightfully original rollercoaster of a mind game that keeps you guessing till the last minute.

If you just read it, it would seem like a Hadley Chase novel. Once you meet the realistically fleshed out characters double-crossed by the absurdities of fate, they would seem straight out of a Coen Brothers film. If you just listened to the music, it would sound like a free-flowing fusion between R.D.Burman and the jazzy sophisticated score from Danny Oceans franchise. If you paid attention to the way it is shot and edited, you will spot half a dozen influences ranging from Guy Ritchie to Tarantino to Vijay Anand.

And yet, all these inspired parts fall perfectly in place for an gripping game of cards, with Raghavan winning every round except maybe one (almost everyone in the audience can spot a dream-sequence when they see it), the master stroke being the not-so-Blood Simple finale.
Not that this film completely belongs to the crafty technician.

It’s been a really long time since we’ve seen a film where actors have completely surrendered to the characters they are playing. Dharmendra breathes some heavy-duty drama into the proceedings with his restrained body language and the angst-filled voice modulation (the usual ‘Kuttey Kamine’ updated to ‘son of a beach’). Your heart goes out to this fine actor. And there’s the ever-reliable Vinay Pathak playing an endearing gambler with his cheeky punch-lines and flawless timing. Watch out for the scene where he convinces his wife to mortgage her beauty parlour as she watches Amitabh Bachchan in ‘Parwana’ (one of the biggest sources of inspiration for the film’s plot and protagonist). From the story-telling point of view, this scene is an ace.

Zakir Hussain is a revelation. Be it displaying frustration or anger or just lecherously leering at women, the man’s a natural employing his flair for comedy to lighten up proceedings.

The Gaddaar, Neil Nitin Mukesh is the find of the year as he walks through his graph from the innocent, helpless, remorseful con to pure cold-blooded evil.

No, this is not a suspense film in the classical sense. Right from the first act, you know he’s the traitor but it’s not about the ‘what’ or ‘who’. Johnny Gaddaar is all about the how things unfold and that’s the mind-game the director plays with the audience.

Putting you into the shoes of the traitor, Sriram takes you through a reckless, dangerous dark path full of surprises at every corner. There are a few speed-breakers, like the mandatory build-up song before the finale (a staple of the Hindi cinema of the seventies) but as long as it all stays true to the spirit of the homage intended, it’s all good.

This fanboy celebration of films is pure delight for movie buffs.

Take a bow, Raghavan. Double Thumbs Up. Five on five stars.

A must-watch for the likes of Sanjay Gupta and Priyadarshan. A crash course on the huge difference between tribute and plagiarism.

http://sudermovies.blogspot.com

That Four Letter Word : Free!

September 27, 2007 · by sudhishkamath

That four letter word premieres tonight in Bombay at Fun Cinemas, Andheri. If you happen to live in Bombay, feel free to drop in tonight at 10:45. (Free being the operative word)
The movie is releasing tomorrow at the same multiplex and will be playing at the 6:20 slot. Those who can’t make it tonight or want to watch it again, do buy tickets and support Independent Cinema! 😀

Page 33 of 88 « Previous 1 … 31 32 33 34 35 … 88 Next »
  • Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar