• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • December 2025
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
    « Dec    
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Bol Bachchan: Bad stunt

July 8, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Comedy

Director: Rohit Shetty

Cast: Abhishek Bachchan, Ajay Devgn, Asin, Prachi Desai

Storyline: A man lies through his teeth to save his job

Bottomline: The worst remake of a film since Ram Gopal Varma Ki Aag

Sitting through Bol Bachchan is like sitting through multiple car wrecks. No, seriously. There is enough car on car action all through this unwarranted Rohit Shetty remake of Golmaal.

Well, it’s made by stuntmen, you see. Something they don’t want you to miss.

Think 12 Angry Men performed entirely by blondes WHILE they are watching the Sidney Lumet classic on stage BECAUSE they keep forgetting their lines. Or Star Wars staged by the cast of World Wrestling Federation just because they speak English like Yoda. “Talk like him, we can. So fight with tubelights, let us.”

There’s enough bad English in this film under the pretext of humour to make even Rowdy Rathore go: Don’t Angry Me.

If you liked Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s Golmaal, which you sure did, you would want to protest this assault on one of the effortlessly funny films of all time.

Here, the effort shows in every scene.

Every actor opens his mouth knowing well that he has to deliver a funny line that’s mostly dead on arrival. While the iconic Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) was a natural born scum who premeditated his lies and Bhavani Shankar (Utpal Dutt) was a hypocritical culture Nazi, Rohit Shetty and his writers paint their characters in monochrome.

Here the hero lies because he is noble and his nemesis buys it because he’s kind at heart. Abbas (Abhishek Bachchan) wants to save a child from drowning in the temple. So to prevent bloodshed, he lies that he’s Abhishek Bachchan.

Whoa! So that’s how communal India of today has become.

What’s worse is the fact that the makers resort to gay jokes by making Abbas play an effeminate dance teacher who turns on an army of wrestlers. Stay classy, guys.

We can’t really fault the actors here when the lines were cursed from the start. Abhishek Bachchan gives it all and the effort shows sometimes while Ajay Devgn walks around hamming it like he’s in on the joke.

And thus, the classic comedy about generation gap becomes approximated to… well, people blowing up cars while making off-colour jokes about race and homosexuality because there are puns waiting to be milked.

Yes, you will laugh a couple of times mostly because the actors manage to salvage a bad joke here and there.

But most of it does not even make sense. Sample Ajay Devgn translating “You make my heart swell in pride to” to “My chest has become blouse.”

That’s pretty much how funny Rohit Shetty’s translation of Golmaal is.

(This review originally appeared here)

Proust Questionnaire: Nagesh Kukunoor

July 8, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

What is your idea of happiness?
To feel the rush that could come from driving down a gorgeous stretch of road with the sun beating down on your face, or a rock concert you  are at or a perfect take on the sets… Happiness comes naturally in the true, intense, unexpected sense of the word.

What is your greatest fear?
That I would lose the passion. I’ve always felt that we are wired to have a mad, maniacal passion for that one special thing. For me, it’s filmmaking.
The greatest fear is that you might just lose it and then what’s your purpose in life? What’s the point of waking up in the morning?

If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?
Honestly, if I could just remember to wake up and smell the roses or the coffee. Basically, to just enjoy the moment instead of glossing over it and enjoying it at hindsight.
If you could change one thing about your family, what would it be? I wish we met more often. I meet them once a year and it’s too less that I don’t get to enjoy that.

What do you consider your greatest achievement?
Without a doubt, making Hyderabad Blues. It was very simple. There’s a lot of things that one actually feels about one self. That you are meant for a lot more, that you are capable of a lot more. And it wasn’t until I made Hyderabad Blues that I gave myself any sense of
validity. It was not the success, just the making of the film. All your life you are like, give me a chance I could do this and that but after Hyderabad Blues, I felt I had nothing more to prove to anyone or myself.

If you were to die and come back as a person or thing, what do you think it would be?
Maybe as a rock. You would eliminate a lot of unnecessary thinking because of the tendency to do what you think is fit or fair or to analyze and over analyze everything. l think it is so much nicer to just stop thinking…

If you could choose what to come back as, what would it be?
Hugh Hefner would not be a bad idea.

What is your idea of misery?
To be physically incapacitated. I am a fairly active person and it’s the physical things that I do that give me my equilibrium and sanity.

Where would you like to live?
On a ranch in the US outside a big city with my own vegetable and fruit garden. Not way out in the boondocks but with access to the big city so that you have it when you need it.

What is your favourite occupation?
Filmmaking is the central most occupation that truly completes me…  Two professions actually –  One, doctors. It’s a profession I’m most fascinated by. Two, chef. If I were not a filmmaker, I think I could be a chef. I truly enjoy cooking. I think being a chef and being a doctor are at some level about the propagation of life…

What is your most marked characteristic?
That’s an easy one. It’s single-mindedness to the point of ridiculousness. I can have such tunnel vision that I can block out stuff, actually block out living for years, while I just focus on the task. That kind of single mindedness is stupid at times and that’s why I said I wish I could just remember to stop and smell the roses.

What is the quality you most like in the opposite sex?
Oh brother! I would like to go for sensuality. I know it seems superficial but sensuality can come in many ways. I know I could have said companionship, intelligence or honesty but I would rather pick this because women have the ability to be sensual in a million
different ways, doing the most mundane of things – whether it is reading a book, dicing vegetables, yawning, you name it…

What do you most appreciate in your friends?
Loyalty. Just knowing that you can count on them, no matter what the crap is.

Who are your favourite authors?
First, I would pick Stephen King and then George Orwell and JD Salinger

Who is your favourite hero of fiction?
Indiana Jones. Well, like I used his character in Aashayein, Indiana Jones represents adventure, the ability to take life to that next level.
Raiders of the Lost Ark (which introduced Indiana Jones) is the film that changed my life. It was that epiphanic moment that I decided to become a filmmaker. I am drawn to the rush and sense of adventure (don’t always have the guts to follow through) and therefore Indiana is a constant reminder… To take that step, physically and metaphorically, and embark on another adventure! If I could do it periodically it would be so amazing.

Who are your heroes in real life?
I would pick some contemporary ones. Richard Branson, George Clooney and Steve Soderberg. Branson is a true maverick that every step he takes is outside the box. He’s brash and has the guts to stick to his intuition. Clooney –  because it’s interesting that after becoming one of  the biggest movie star, he turned his attention to humanitarian efforts.
Only one in a billion can become a Gandhi. I could never reach that level but I can aspire to do what Clooney does. Make money, enjoy life and help the world. And Steve Soderberg because he’s a direct connect to my field. He has the guts to do everything…Successful, bizarre, off the wall, Oscar stuff and still he could shoot something on a Canon 5D
in half a day and make something out of it. I am in awe of someone like that.

What are your favourite names?
I think girls names evoke beautiful images… Salma Hayek, Madhubala… Wow. They bring a smile to your face when you just think of these names but there are too many to mention.

What is your present state of mind?
Reinvention. Way before, during my chemical engineering days, I read about a CEO… Every five years, he kind of almost restarts, he starts to do something radical and different and keeps his interests fresh… I take a lot of risks through my films… so there is some degree of reinvention but I’m trying to make it more than just films, in my personal life as well.

How would you like to die?
Without knowing. An accident or in your sleep. The knowledge of death is the worst thing. I don’t care when I go. But I just hope it’s Boom!
And Adios! And it’s done. Finished and over. It’s like seeing a 100 foot wave coming towards… One intense moment of awe and it’s over.

What is your favourite motto?
It’s something I’ve done for many years. “Either you do or you don’t.” The rest are just excuses and in betweens. It’s a saying that I put up at the start of every project. I genuinely believe in this.

(Nagesh Kukunoor is a fiercely independent filmmaker who continues to make films that defy convention and genre. His filmography includes the critically acclaimed Hyderabad Blues, Rockford, Bollywood Calling, Teen Deewarein, Iqbal, Dor, Aashayein and Mod)

This interview originally appeared here.

Interview: Lakshmy Ramakrishnan – The Upswing

June 28, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

You can never be too old to chase your dreams.

For 30 years now, Lakshmy has been nursing a dream. To share stories and take people into a world of fantasy.

When her debut feature film ‘Aarohanam’ hits the screens on July 27, Lakshmy Ramakrishnan’s dream would turn into a fairytale!

Aarohanam, that features strong, spirited women and tackles domestic issues with unprecedented sensitivity, is easily one of the finest Tamil films in years and probably the best you will see this year. We caught it at a private screening and the early buzz includes director K.Balachander himself showering the film with praise for her conviction and experiments with linearity.

Lakshmy has subverted every cliche Tamil cinema has been infested with over the last two decades and turns it into a celebration. Mothers will weep and the film is sure to sweep you off your feet with its brand of feel good entertainment. This is a film made with so much heart.

One that Bala, Vasanta Balan, Sashikumar, Balaji and every other filmmaker branching out from that school of cinema must watch. To learn that you don’t need to show poverty and misery to make people cry under the pretext of realism. You don’t need to paint the rich as evil and poor as good in every film saying that the story demanded the stereotypes. You don’t need to blatantly manipulate or exaggerate any condition – physical or mental – to tell stories of suffering. It’s a trend that has continued all the way till Vazhukku Enn 18/9. It’s high time someone stopped the pity-party. It’s something I have been praying for, for years: READ THIS. Lakshmy does exactly that. (Interview after the trailer below)

As we dig deeper into her story, we realise only a mother could have made this film.

You must have been familiar with Lakshmy as an actress over the past few years, having played strong supporting roles in over 30 Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu and Hindi films including Vinnaithaandi Varuvaaya, Yuddham Sei, Poi Solla Porum, Eeram, Naan Mahaan Alla, Vettaikaaran. Today, she’s a household name having done over 175 episodes with ‘Aval’ (on Vijay TV).

But it was in 1984 when TV serials were just coming in that actress-turned-filmmaker Lakshmy took her first step towards chasing her goal of bringing stories to life.

“I got introduced to someone working in Doordarshan and started working on 13 episodes based on short stories that used to appear in Women’s Era. I wanted to picturise these. It was an innocent, ignorant sort of enthusiasm but I wanted to do it.”

But by the time things materialised, she had to move to the United States. “My husband got a posting with IBM and I decided to move because I was carrying my first baby.”

In the next 20 years, she straddled many worlds – from US to Singapore to Muscat to Coimbatore – taking care of her family and managing careers in business, fashion designing and event management when a chance encounter with Malayalam filmmaker Lohithadas brought her back to the camera.

“We had a farmhouse and he wanted to shoot there. We didn’t give the place but he approached me for the next film and that’s how I came back to cinema – with Chakaramuthu, the remake of Kasturimaan. I played Kavya’s single mom and I got a meaty 32 scene role and a well-etched out mother-daughter arc to prove myself as an actress,” she says.

She continued her experiments with short films and thanks to her marketing acumen, was successful in shooting them in Tamil and Malayalam. “I just walked in to Jaya TV and asked them for a slot. They gave me a slot and I even ended up making a profit.”

Lakshmy shot six such films for TV while she continued acting. She also made shot short films and one of her shorts ‘Radio’ which she made for SCARF on positive mental health won awards all around the world.

After doing four Malayalam films, she shifted to Chennai in 2006. “‘Pirivom Santhipom’ was my first Tamil film. I was offered Azhagiya Tamizh Magan but since I was shooting for a Malayalam film then, I couldn’t do it. And then Poi Solla Porum happened.”

And before she knew it, she had 15 offers. She picked 10 and spent the next two years shooting as she realised she was getting tired of playing the similar roles. There wasn’t much scope for women on screen.

It was in 2009 that she attended the screenwriting workshop organised by Kamal Haasan at IIT, Madras. “I got an insight into the process of scriptwriting. I had a thirst for knowledge and I was so excited and it opened up many doors for me. It was like someone taking me to the sea and telling me that I could either just jump in and help myself to how much ever I could absorb or take back a little in a tumbler. That exposure really affected me.”

She had just written a story in 2008 about a woman who affected her a lot but she moved on to writing another film called ‘Kural 786’  after the workshop. “I had a producer, we almost announced the film when the German Bakery blast happened and my daughter’s close friend and brother passed away. I was affected so much that I didn’t have the confidence to handle the subject. As I sat down to do the shot division, I realised I wasn’t ready. I couldn’t handle it. I bought more time but admitted to the producer that I wasn’t ready and returned the advance. I was full of self-doubt and scared.”

“Whenever I met Raji and Uma Padmanabhan at shows we attended together, we would wonder: We see so many spirited women around but we don’t see them on screen. We wanted to make a desi Hangover kind of a film and have a blast. We started working on that and as we got deeper into the third character into the film, I realised that I had already written about this person in 2008, the story I had shelved. And soon her character dominated and took over the film. I produced it myself because it was an experiment. I did not know if it was possible for me to translate what I had in my head on to the screen.”

Last August, she decided to stop taking on new films just to focus on her film. She signed up for ‘Aval’ so that it would give her “the pocket money” she needed to produce the film herself though producer A V Anoop volunteered to put in the full amount. “With TV, you know you have to devote half a month and are able to plan better. With films, the dates keep changing all the time.”

Lakshmy shot her 90 minute ‘Aarohanam’ in just 20 days with a Canon 5D digital camera, working with its limitation. “Aarohanam is upswing, a crescendo… And our film is about that Arohanam in the central character’s life.”

Her three daughters – Sharadha, Sruthi and Shreeya – pitched in and her husband Ram managed the household for the last six months. “Sruthi was my assistant director and the eldest one , Sharadha was one of the co-producers, she sang the party song. My little one is my right hand.”

The industry is so impressed with her film that she already has two producers for her next two projects. “I next want to do an entertainer. I will probably do Kural as my third film. I will continue doing Aval and not take up anything else after that but I just ended signing up for two cute roles in films again.”

The moment of truth

“Watching films was considered a sin where I come from. Only widows used to shave their heads.

Mysskin had only one condition for Yuddham Sei: If you are ready to shave your head, you can do this role.

It turned out to be a revelation for me.

I had never removed my ‘Metti’ for the past 27 years and even if the ‘pottu’ moved from its place, I would feel insecure. And going ‘mottai’ was something unimaginable in Brahmin families. I was complaining there are no meaty roles and when there was one, why should I not do it?

It was not like cutting off my hand or leg… it was hair. The moment I did, I shed all my superstition. As a person, I felt so light, I was rid of all that baggage of superstition.

My father was 18 when his mom had to tonsure her head. He was shocked and couldn’t deal with it. My Dad is 90 years old now. I didn’t want to hide it from him. So I called him and told him I cut my hair. How short, he asked. Very short, I said.

As luck would have it, one of the local newspapers carried a story that I tonsured my head and I felt relieved that I didn’t have to break it to him.

So I went home bald and he didn’t say a word. So finally, I asked Appa: Why didn’t you say anything?

He just smiled and said: It looks good on you.”

(An edited version of this story appeared here.)

Gangs of Wasseypur: Part Time Avenger

June 24, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

Image

How do you evaluate an incomplete painting?

Or half a story?

It seems unfair but this is a situation the makers of Gangs of Wasseypur have forced on us by making us pay to watch what’s clearly an incomplete story. Yes, we can always appreciate individual moments and scenes but not all of us are die-hard Kashyap fans. Yet.

I wish it was as simple as saying that Gangs of Wasseypur 1 is half-empty or half-full of the plot but at this point, it looks like it holds no water.

Good filmmaking, or shot-taking, doesn’t always translate to good storytelling. While every frame here is so passionately put together (cinematography by Rajeev Ravi and edited by Shweta Venkat Mathew), supremely performed with brilliantly conceived moments of quirk and humour, Part 1 just doesn’t come together as a cohesive story.

Gangs Of Wasseypur is a trip, no doubt. A trip to nowhere, one most enjoyed if you are an Anurag Kashyap fan. You buy a ticket to Wasseypur, you meet colourful, gun-toting, expletive-spewing, sex maniacs on the way and share a couple of laughs, amused by their choice of language till the buffoonery gets repetitive. After a long, bumpy ride through every other busy bylane close to where you boarded from, the driver leaves you stranded on a highway with a note: “Next bus to Wasseypur in three months.”

You paid to watch revenge. What you get is a guy doing everything else except that. Unfortunately, most of us still consume films as stories and as far as stories go, Wasseypur Part 1 is a non-starter, a deceitful film that delivers none of the promise of that revenge advertised in big block letters: Keh ke loonga. Fine, but take already. The only thing it takes is your ticket money. All talk, no walk.

It’s all backdrop, backdrop, backdrop spelt out all through… and even that backdrop of coal mining is not convincing, as the film pretends to be a documentary on the subject with archival footage that does nothing to the narrative except prolong it with endless voiceover.

Voiceover here isn’t used to help you settle in, it’s the thread and glue that holds the loosely arranged pieces together, a character who returns to keep us in the loop, as bursts of superimposed text to illustrate timelines and character names are slapped on the screen, every few minutes. Show, tell and text on top! (This evening, the team has also released a family tree for those still confused about who’s who in the film)

While the two-part Kill Bill sets up the context and leaves two out of the five people in the list dead, assuring you are halfway home, Gangs of Wasseypur Part 1 cancels out everything that happens with its climactic moment, not just taking the hero back to square one but changing its mind about who the hero is.

So we just watched a 160 minute long prologue?

Even an out of form Ram Gopal Varma showed some focus in his indulgent, pulpy two-part Rakta Charitra. Part 1: One guy rises to power leaving the other guy who has lost his whole family understandably thirsting for revenge in Part 2.

Here, we don’t even understand why revenge is that important for the guy who has sworn to keep his head shaved till he has ruined his enemy.

If you want us to connect or understand the avenger’s motivation, he must have some quality that makes us root for him or at least some injustice meted out to him. But his father was a scheming scoundrel too. Sardar Khan has no redeeming quality except that it is portrayed by a fantastic Manoj Bajpayee.

The protagonist’s full time occupation is being a sex maniac, revenge is a part time thing he would do, like, over a few decades when he’s not getting his women pregnant. His misadventures with the two women in the film make for delightful vignettes but there’s little else powering this film except the entry of the endearingly filmi Faisal Khan (Nawazuddin) towards the end.

The trailer of Part 2 is one of the slickest ever you will see this year and going by the fun promised, you can blindly book your tickets to watch the Nawazuddin Siddiqui show. Richa Chaddha’s Nagma is guaranteed to win her fans, Reema Sen looks every bit the seductress and Huma Qureshi’s charm and chemistry with Nawazuddin sparkles.

Piyush Mishra makes for a wicked cheating Consigliori, Jaideep Alhawat is dispensed off early on as the man whose death triggers off this epic, Jameel Khan amuses us playing the foil to Bajpayee, while Pankaj Tripathi makes for a menacing baddie we want to see more of.

Like the villain of the piece Ramadhir Singh (Tigmanshu Dhulia lends this character so much charisma and intensity) demonstrates, coal becomes heavier when soaked in water, but there’s only so much you can adulterate it with.

Here, coal is substituted with coolth. We are so cool that in our town, we call the women, Womaniya (Hats off to music director Sneha Khanwalkar for the soundtrack that provides some respite). We are so cool that we use gorgeous-looking typeface guaranteed to make you drool even if it wears a vibe different from the rustic environs of the film. We are so cool that we would make the opening credits of ‘Kyonki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi’ look like a joke. We are so cool we have characters called Definite, Perpendicular and Tangent in Part 2 of Gangs of Wasseypur because honestly, we got tired of keeping count of the Khans and Qureshis in the film!

All that coolth and pop realism may do well with the die-hard Kashyap cult but for the rest of us who paid to watch a bloody saga of revenge, it seems like a long wait at the circus.

Genre: Gangster

Director: Anurag Kashyap

Cast: Manoj Bajpayee, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Richa Chaddha, Reema Sen, Huma

Qureshi, Jameel Khan, Tigmanshu Dhulia, Pankaj Tripathi, Jaideep Alhawat

Storyline: A man must avenge the death of his father, but he whiles away his time making babies.

Bottomline: Epic fail. Probably works a lot better when seen back to back.

A shorter version of this originally appeared here.

Teri Meri Kahaani: Trolling Shakespeare

June 24, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

If the other release of the week, Gangs of Wasseypur split its epic story into two parts that add up to five hours and twenty minutes, this one does exactly the opposite – packs three stories into a 120 minute long film – and yet manages to feel longer than the sum of the Wasseypur films.

Shahid Kapoor has achieved that rare feat of playing a star-crossed lover in back to back films across space (Mausam) and time (Teri Meri Kahaani) and proved that he can actually pick films that are bad no matter where they are set or which period they are set in.

From start to finish, Teri Meri Kahaani is as fake as it gets, a quality that wouldn’t have been as frustrating if it didn’t happen three times over in the same film!

Every location feels gimmicky, costume unrealistically flashy and conflict contrived. With hardly 40 minutes available per story, this could’ve made for a tight, snappy narrative. But no, even in these 40 minutes, the makers want them to go singing and dancing together… even when the boy is in prison! “Just have the girl enter prison and make someone throw the keys away so that they can sing and dance, yaar.”

In each of the three stories, the boy has a back-up girl, no matter how silly or immature he has been. We are talking about a boy who is juvenile enough to upload pictures of him in bed with his girlfriend and make them public on Facebook with captions ‘Jism’ and ‘Jism 2’!

The makers clearly are not in sync with any of the eras they have portrayed, be it 1910 (The hero from Lahore wishes aloud that we didn’t get freedom lest all the pretty women in his neighbourhood go to Hindustan… except that it wasn’t until 1930 did the Muslim League propose a separate nation) or 2012 (Yo, dudes! The kids these days aren’t stupid enough to live-tweet what they are thinking DURING the date… certainly not stuff like ‘I think she’s cute but she talks too much’.)

The 2012 episode set in Stratford-Upon-Avon (some respect for Shakespeare’s hometown, please?) featuring the modern day Krish, Meera and Radha seems written by a generation that’s never ever touched a computer, let alone mobile phone.

Priyanka Chopra tries hard to sound cute and Shahid Kapoor still gets himself mixed up with Shah Rukh Khan.

Teri Meri Kahaani is so bad that it makes us want to warn you thrice. Skip. Skip. Skip.

Genre: Romantic Comedy

Director: Kunal Kohli

Cast: Shahid Kapoor, Priyanka Chopra, Neha Sharma, Prachi Desai

Storyline: Boy meets, loves and gets girl in three different eras

Bottomline: They haven’t figured it out yet themselves, don’t blame us

Ferrari Ki Sawaari: Bumpy Emotional Rollercoaster

June 19, 2012 · by sudhishkamath
It is never easy to make a film where one of the characters actually gets to say ”I just stole Sachin’s Ferrari.”
And this – the fact that the makers set it up for their conscientious lower middle class protagonist to actually get his hands on the Little Master’s dream machine – is the part of the ride that’s thoroughly entertaining and almost plausible.
At a basic emotional level, this is essentially a story of two fathers. One who stopped his son from chasing his dream of being a cricketer owing to his history with the game and that son who grew up into a caring, loving father who wouldn’t think twice before breaking the family piggy bank to buy his son the bat he fancies. Even if the real need is for better shoes than a bat he can borrow for the match.
At a more social level, this is the story of contemporary India where the gap between the haves and the have nots has increased so much that it takes a miracle for the lower middle class to afford the quality of training that is priced for the rich.
It’s a modern day fairy tale and treated like one as the writers (story is by Rajesh Mapuskar and Raju Hirani, dialogues by Raju Hirani and the Screenplay is credited to Rajesh Mapuskar and Vidhu Vinod Chopra) manage tosuspend our disbelief for most of the superbly executed set-up.
It’s post interval that the film descends into excessive manipulative melodrama with plot contrivances guaranteed to make you roll your eyes and grind your teeth. While the film makes us root for the father forced to ”borrow” the Ferrari, it frustrates us by making him do the silliest things – the equivalent of the blonde girl following the noise in a horror film instead of running away from it. We stop relating to a film where all characters suddenly decide to behave like idiots just so that the makers can milk them for melodrama.
And there’s the unwarranted media circus and a meandering comedic subplot involving the father-son dynamic between a local gangster turned politician and his groom-to-be son that slows down the ride further.
Ferrari Ki Sawaari bears the brand of feel good drama that we have come to expect from Hirani and Vinod Chopra and debutant Rajesh Mapuskar crafts some genuinely heartwarming moments in the first half and towards the very end, extracting finely nuanced performances from the entire ensemble.
Sharman Joshi excels in this author-backed role (though his fake eyebrows are a little distracting) while Boman Irani as the bitter old man delivers his best, most refined performance. The kid Ritwik Sahore is a natural and wins you over instantly while Paresh Rawal shows us his range in a cameo. The rest of the supporting cast comprising of lesser known actors bring in the laughs too.
As entertaining as they may be, this Ferrari would’ve coasted along fine had the two-seater not been this populated. Like in the film, it runs out of petrol soon enough only to be dragged on by a bullock cart of a narrative.
Genre: Drama
Director: Rajesh Mapuskar
Cast: Sharman Joshi, Boman Irani, Ritwik Sahore, Paresh Rawal
Storyline: The head clerk of an RTO needs to beg, borrow or steal Sachin’s Ferrari to fund his son’s cricket training camp at Lords
Bottomline: Partly superlative, mostly manipulative
This review originally appeared here.

Shanghai: When The Plot Became Thicker

June 19, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

Image

Six years ago, the country discovered an honest voice in Dibakar Banerjee with Khosla Ka Ghosla when an unlikely bunch of ordinary middle class people took on an all-powerful land-grabbing mafia to reclaim their plot.

The plot is no different here. It just got bigger. Replace Khosla’s Ghosla with Bharatnagar (a microcosm for India of course) and the land-grabbing mafia with the State-sponsored International Business Park (IBP) and what you get is the uncompromising, taut remake of Z, the 1966 novel by Greek writer Vassilis Vassilikos, that sits perfectly fine in a modern Indian context.

Shanghai is the story of a country where high-rise business parks backed by capitalists are replacing poor housing colonies and any voice of dissent is silenced by the State itself. This is a world run by the morally bankrupt. One where idealists are maligned with scams and duty conscious government bureaucrats wrestle with conscience before passing every file.

Dibakar presents us with some of the most interesting characters we have seen onscreen in recent times. A videographer who sometimes shoots porn (Emraan Hashmi), a Tamil IAS officer who considers taking on a lucrative foreign assignment to close down a case (Abhay Deol) and a social activist and professor with a weakness for falling in love with his students (Prosenjit Chatterjee). The support cast is terrific too. Pitobash, Farooque Shaikh making a comeback and Kalki Koechlin get author-backed parts written to their strengths.

But instead of letting the text tell the story, the filmmaker decides to let the visuals do all the talking. The dialogue, though sharp, is just incidental as the director chooses to enrich the narrative with every faculty available to him. Actors are cast against the grain (a little too against the tide for Abhay Deol playing a Tamilian), the production design is rich with detail and nuance, the rare background score knows when to drown everything (and when to shut up) and then, there are the stray elements of chaos that creep into the frame to remind you of the country we live in. Be it the stray football entering an official government enquiry, the slippery wet floors or the taps without water. Very rarely do we come across films where even the locations are telling us more about the state of affairs than the dialogue itself.

Cinematographer Nikos Andritsakis takes us through this maze for justice with his painstakingly crafted long takes while the writers of Shanghai, Dibakar Banerjee and Urmi Juvekar, backed by the editor Namrata Rao, seem confident enough to let the pieces of the jigsaw unfold little by little, and surprise us every few minutes in this tight thriller with a runtime of less than two hours.

The songs by Vishal and Shekhar are sneaked in rather nicely strictly for the set-up and even the ‘item song’ has everything to do with the plot.

With not a single dull moment and every department in fine form, this is tour de force filmmaking. Simply one of the best and bravest films you will see this year.

Genre: Political Thriller

Director: Dibakar Banerjee

Cast: Abhay Deol, Emraan Hashmi, Kalki Koechlin, Prosenjit Chatterjee, Farooque Shaikh, Tillotama Shome, Pitobash

Storyline: As a social activist lies in coma for taking a stand against the State’s decision to build a business park by taking over a housing colony, the quest for justice begins

Bottomline: That rare, almost uncompromising political thriller where the subtext and the context are more significant than the text itself. One where the visuals speak louder than words.

Interview: Habib Faisal – On YRF and its homecoming

June 5, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

There are filmmakers who take pride in working outside the system. And there are those who are quietly changing the system from within.

Within half a decade, the writer of ‘Salaam Namaste,’ ‘Jhoom Barabar Jhoom,’ ‘Ta Ra Rum Pum,’ ‘Band Baaja Baaraat’ and ‘Ladies versus Ricky Bahl,’ has slowly and steadily, has managed to steer a mammoth ship from picturesque foreign waters back to the dusty heartland of India.

Writer-director Habib Faisal, who made the recent box office winner ‘Ishaqzaade’ and the critically acclaimed ‘Do Dooni Chaar’ tells us how he managed to find his voice with stories rooted in the Indian middle class by working with the system.

Q: What do you find more satisfying – critical acclaim or box office success?

I have never made films for critics or festivals. I think reviewers should understand that the intent of a Housefull 2 or Rowdy Rathore is different from the intent of an Ishaqzaade or a Paan Singh Tomar or a Vicky Donor, which has to be approached like a streetplay.

If I am able to communicate a certain idea that needs to be told… If I have been able to communicate to the aam aadmi that “Listen, there’s a possibility of a Parma and Zoya falling in love” or if someone makes that film like Paan Singh Tomar about the plight of sportsmen in this country, then the idea becomes bigger than the film itself.

How that idea is shot and edited is a matter of subjective taste and choices that may not work for everyone. The numbers or box office figures are not a dirty thing. Kahaani was not a Dirty Picture? A story of a pregnant woman rooted in a cultural specificity of Kolkata has appealed to everyone. Yes, the Rowdy Rathores will happen but I am glad that Kahaani, Paan Singh Tomar and Vicky Donor have also happened and translated to numbers. There’s room for both. If a film has a certain humility towards the audience and its intelligence and it’s need for entertainment, it will work.

I don’t need to give an example better than Amar Akbar Antony. It’s not a dumbed down film. Manmohan Desai is very aware and knows how to use suspension of disbelief to package his take on secularism. When we get to know that Akbar’s parents are actually Hindus, Akbar does not become a Hindu, he continues to be a Muslim and marries Salma. Our audience had this huge level of tolerance that nobody questioned it. Our audience is intelligent.

Q: You said that Zoya in Ishaqzaade is a strong character given her social context when some critics called it regressive. How do you manage to make sure you write strong roles for women?

I don’t sit out to write feminist films. I like to give the players involved an equal footing and same amount of strengths and human flaws so that the drama can be interesting. It does not have anything to do with gender. I don’t consciously decide to write strong women characters. They just end up being strong maybe because the women around me have always been strong women and they find their way into these characters. In Ishaqzaade, Zoya comes from a small town where women are brutalised and within her kind of space, she reacts to that in her own way.  She’s strong given that milieu.

How did you manage to convince a production house that was happy making films in foreign locations move back home with Band Baaja Baarat or Ishaqzaade?

What has changed is the way the audiences are reacting to films. Therefore, a production house like YRF also improvises and reinvents itself. I enjoy the same respect as I enjoyed even when as Salaam Namaste. Even if a film bombs, because Aditya Chopra is a writer, he knows that there are N number of factors, which go into making a film work or not work. What’s changed is not YRF, what’s changed is how the media has given recognition to the writer. Now, we need to demystify this further. How many reviews write about production designers even today?

Your films seem to be decidedly steeped in the local dialect

It came instinctively because I wanted to hear characters talk a language that is human. I didn’t like to watch films that have stock phrases that we have heard in so many films. I think it has to do with one’s own taste. Me, the maker writes a film according to the taste of Me, the viewer.

You seem to find the Indian middle class India fascinating.

All those films happened instinctively. Maybe because it has to do primarily with how one has grown up and has seen closely or grew up watching films that reflected that middle class reality.

Be it Golmaal or Chupke Chupke or even action films like Deewar or Amar Akbar Antony, they all reflected a certain reality and entertained. In the nineties and early 2000s, everybody wanted to remake Hollywood romantic comedies or make a Hindi Friends where all characters were a variant of Ross or Rachel or Monica or Chandler. At least now we are only borrowing our own narrative from the South.

How do you define realism in a canvas meant to be larger than life?

The real is the motive of the character. When that motive leads to an action, that action can stick to the larger than life canvas… That’s what I love about Manmohan Desai’s Amar Akbar Antony. A simple, macho man who is beaten up, his machismo bruised, stands in front of the mirror, so drunk that he becomes his own doppelganger and it works at a bizarre level… Yet, the motive is real and larger than life.

The interview originally appeared here.

Rowdy Rathore: So brainless you could get an aneursym

June 3, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Action

Director: Prabhudeva

Cast: Akshay Kumar, Sonakshi Sinha, Nasser

Storyline: A compulsive thief takes the place of a cop to avenge his doppelganger

Bottomline: Laugh at it a little, laugh with it a little but the Rowdy has the last laugh

It’s as rowdy as it gets in Bollywood in this faithful remake of the Telugu film Vikramakudu (Siruthai in Tamil) where Akshay gets his licence to misbehave, fool around and have some fun, pretty much like Salman Khan did in Wanted or Ajay Devgn did in Singham.

To be fair, Prabhudeva does treat it like a comic book to make the implausible seem all the more larger than life. It’s the kind of a film where the man and the girl fall in love at first sight. So what if he’s a thief, he’s honest enough to tell her he’s one.

This action entertainer is the gratification of every male fantasy – where the hero gets to channel his inner Shakti Kapoor than the well-behaved Amol Palekar. Rowdy Rathore is unabashedly male escapist entertainment that reinforces the age-old belief in Indian cinema that the hero is a God and the villains who harass the innocent are the modern day manifestations of ‘asuras’.

Only that the hero though called Shiva is more Krishna is his traits: mischief, flirtation and smarts.

The revelry in the film works best when Akshay has to play the over-the-top Rowdy in purple pants. It’s the sentimental scenes that really stick out like a sore thumb in this longish, disjointed narrative that has many random sequences thrown in, especially in the second half, with blatant disregard for logic or continuity. Equally random are the song placements or the excuses for them to unfold.

Rowdy Rathore plays out like a spoof for most of its running time and those are the fun bits. The length and the melodrama, especially indulgent shots of obnoxious caricatures for villains makes you feel like you’ve been at the receiving end of Shiva’s ‘Chinta Ta Ta’ drill… You will figure out what that means the hard way when you watch the film.

The film wears the kitsch-as-entertainment badge on its heart to unleash the cheesiest, corniest and campiest of cliches. And this celebration of non-stop nonsense is somewhat watchable only because Akshay Kumar makes for a rambunctious Rowdy. Now, if only he didn’t take playing the cop all that seriously.

While people used to the masala movies of Vijay (he also makes a cameo appearance in a song) or any of the action heroes down South may not find anything new in the plot or the treatment, the audience that celebrated the other Hindi remakes of South Indian films may just enjoy this pretty much the same way people in the West enjoy Hindi cinema. As a colourful, riotous, musical you are actually laughing at more often than with but don’t mind only because you are getting entertained by the ridiculousness of it all.

Just like Hollywood seems to embrace Bollywood for colour, Bollywood seems to be embracing the South for spice. And kitsch.

(This review originally appeared here.)

Department: Lost in the underworld

May 21, 2012 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Action

Director: Ram Gopal Varma

Cast: Amitabh Bachchan, Sanjay Dutt, Rana Daggubatti, Vijay Raaz, Abhimanyu Singh, Lakshmi Manchu, Anjana Sukhani, Madhu Shalini

Storyline: A young trigger-happy dutiful cop is torn between his loyalty to the department and his senior – a crooked cop.

Bottomline: A weak, loud companion piece to the subtle, sublime Company

The man who once rose above the ordinary to explore the underworld through films like Satya and Company has now sunk to the depths and a hit a new low with Department. Now, underworld just refers to the angles Ram Gopal Varma’s voyeuristic cameras will capture, often aimed literally below the belt.

It’s high time the filmmaker struggling with form realises that this nauseatingly gimmicky camerawork he has been afflicted with in his last few films distract from the story. Department looks like it was shot with mobile phones by Snow White’s seven friends during different stages of their drunken revelry.

Here’s a list of techniques that Department uses to tell its story of encounter cops who run around town shooting gangsters, working for different gangs themselves.

1. The RGV signature underworld shot (Front): There’s just one place where stitches from three different directions meet in any pair of jeans. When you find this region in the centre of the frame, you know you’re watching RGV’s current obsession: a denim clad underworld. But yes, it’s when it becomes a dhoti-clad underworld that it gets a little disturbing.

2. The RGV signature underworld shot (Back): This is quite a textbook approach to shot-taking. The camera must frame in close-up the subject that’s doing all the talking. Simply put, back pockets that fund films like these. Also, because in most cases, they are more expressive than facial movements of the actors. Barring Bachchan Senior who as always saves up his best for Varma and Vijay Raaz, the rest of the cast seem to be modeling for jeans. Except Nathalia Kaur, who couldn’t find a pair and had to be carried out of frame after an item number by lucky extras.

3. Ants in the pants: This shot involves tracking the movement of imaginary ants. Start from the ankle and slowly follow the ant all the way up. This shot is used to suggest impending danger and is employed for building tension during conversations that are far from exciting.

4. Under the nose: This involves capturing the nasal cavity at the centre of the frame and suggests that things are happening right under the character’s nose. A flaring nostril as seen by the world under conveys anger.

5. Tongue in cheek angle: True to its name, this extreme close-up of an actor involves the actor opening his/her mouth to show the other that they still have their tongue in cheek – this is also sometimes used as innuendo.

6. Chaai-Paani: Tea is the national drink of the film business and for long has gone unsung. To cut down on tea and water breaks, RGV has now made it mandatory that tea or water will be served to all actors in the middle of the take.

7. Clean & Dirty: Having been criticised for showing grungy, dirty gangsters, this time around RGV has also decided to show us another side never seen before. We see them bathing. While newcomers Madhu Shalini and Abhimanyu Singh share a bath-tub, their boss Vijay Raaz scrubs himself in front of other gang members. Community bathing.

8. The Finger: The only way we know gangsters are angry is when they point fingers at each other animatedly. It’s a unique way of showing the audience the finger as the most deadly weapon of expression.

9. Striking Visuals: This shot helps to counter criticism and establish once and for all that the film did have at least a couple of striking visuals. Follow the striker on a carrom board. Simple.

10. Keeping it Real: Given all that loud animated swearing and gun-fights used in gangster films, it becomes all the more mandatory for the camera to capture slice of life realism. If a character is scratching an itch, it could be employed as a metaphor for an irritant in the underworld.

Occasionally, when the camera isn’t moving, there are a couple of genuinely interesting moments (like the joke about the difference between ‘Illegally legal and legally illegal”) but this exploration of morality and right and wrong is lost somewhere in between all those tasteless camera angles, pointless chases, endless shootouts, needless songs and brainless slow-mos.

RGV, please fire your camera Department. And Editing as well.

(This review originally appeared here.)

Page 7 of 90 « Previous 1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 90 Next »
  • Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...