• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • December 2025
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
    « Dec    
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Posts By sudhishkamath

Hello: When nature calls, take it. Don’t make a movie.

October 13, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Disclaimers: Spoilers ahead. So unless you’ve read the book already, proceed at your own risk. Actually, who am I kidding… I can’t spoil it for you even if I tried. Besides, it’s not like I want you to watch the film.

Hello plays out as the story of six… janitors, we think, considering these folks spend more time inside the bathroom than on the phone, at a call centre. Maybe their nocturnal junk-food routine has taken a toll on their domestic lives and had also upset their stomach.

Poor slobs. Their American ass-licking boss who himself works double-shift actually expects them to work on a rainy night! Oooh, Pure Evil!

I mean who in India ever goes to work when it rains? Especially, when your office is sending you a stupid chauffer-driven air-conditioned SUV to fetch you and your entire team. Besides, talking on the phone is such a tough job. Only those freak teens manage to do it full-time.

This particular night, things were all set to hit rock bottom.

If you hear a loud noise when you’re on the job, you know you need to use the bathroom. The girls head to the loo together to discuss men, cars and their salaries as the two single boys (both rejected by their women in office) decide to take matter in their own hands… only to be busted by the boss who catches one atop the other going: Whooo-hoo. Thankfully, the open-minded boss doesn’t mind as long as they leave him out of it. They then swoop down on the Big Boss as he feeds the urinal, probably thinking it’s the most opportune time to tell him about a website they’ve put together. Ahem!

Meanwhile, Military Uncle is busy surfing wild life on the internet and forwards clips of those horny beasts to his little grandson. We really wonder why the spamming goes unappreciated by his son.

The rest spend most of the night in the bathroom so much that at one point, Sallu thought the term call centre was actually a nasty little pun on the place where people answered nature’s calls. He suggested to Chetan that he could be shirtless in a Jacuzzi, have a mystic masseuse stroke more than just his ego, while listening to this story. A story that, for a reason he couldn’t immediately fathom, urgently had to be told… But then, it was only natural in his surroundings that uncontrollable objects be dropped and promptly flushed.

So after another one of the many breaks they get that night, the boys then do what dejected lovers do. One of them fondly remembers the sex they had when things were good (and the bitter-sweet pangs of negotiating a D-Cup inside an SUV) and taps her phone to find out all about her honeymoon plans (The director employs a ‘horny conscience’ as his inside voice).

The other guy breaks the office wash-basin and other canteen props on finding out that someone else beat him to the post and got it cheap.

To illustrate that they are all going through the same shit, the team leader breaks it to the only happily married girl in the office that her husband’s been cheating on her.

The last straw is when they eavesdrop into their boss’s phone line and find out that they’re going to be sacked because apparently, productivity record should never show a clean slate. What’s worse is that their boss has passed off the website idea as his own and was all set to leave to the US.

To cut a long story short, an item song and drunken driving later, they find themselves between life and death as their car delicately dangles over a construction site, with only a sheet of iron bars to hold their weight. That’s when they get a call from the voice talent who used to make a living when Mahabharath was on air.

The phone helpfully flashes the caller ID as God and a brief sermon about the need to accept failure later, they are almost rescued but then Amrita Arora over-acts with so much excitement that she could’ve probably killed them that night jumping in her seat.

After surviving the night, they decide to do what it takes for survival. They sneak into their boss’s office, send off a mail to one of the girls who sleeps cheap anyway, blackmail him for sexual harassment and then web-cast the negotiation live to the US. They then indulge in cyber-terrorism to keep their jobs by spreading a hoax virus alert to their database of dumbkopfs… the poor unsuspecting kinds who assume their bras can be washed in a dishwasher just because their lovers told them that the contents were so edible just the previous night.

* * *

Well, that’s what the film version translates a not-so-great-but-entertaining book into.

While the book showed at least an iota of character depth and a little detail that made a mediocre plot barely readable, Chetan Bhagat and Atul Agnihotri have dumbed it down to a ridiculous extent… especially the virus-alert scam.

In the book, when Priyanka breaks the news of her impending engagement, the girls are happy for her and so is she… She laughs out loud while talking to the prospective groom and seems to have clearly moved on from her previous relationship. Here, the filmy friends mourn in silence when she announces her plans for marriage and it is made amply clear that Priyanka hasn’t moved on at all.

The love story is largely unconvincing and plain, in spite of the fact that Sharman and Gul are the best of the lot. They breathe quite a bit of life in these underwritten roles. Sohail is a riot all right. He begins on a sober understated note and realises he’s more at home with his signature snide remarks, quirks and animated expressions and thankfully, manages to provide some comic relief in this otherwise boring film.

Katrina seems to read from a teleprompter and Salman’s ‘listening’ expression is a lot like the one he would have if he were picturing her naked.

Well, so yes Hello is loyal to ‘One Night’ in terms of story but does it capture the call centre culture as credibly?

The accent of Hello (literally too) completely misses the point. The director lets go of so many places where he could’ve built tension and there’s plenty of scope for that: Whether one’s tapping a phone, or hiding to eavesdrop, or sneaking into your boss’s room and of course, the build up to the conversation with God.
Hang on, the conversation was a little cheesy even in the book. Here, though it’s brief, the gyaan is too general and the filmmaker never puts us into the shoes of every individual and their internal conflicts when they absolutely must introspect.

Given that is the big point the book was trying to make (remember Bhagat’s little exercise at the beginning of the book where he asks you to write down what you fear, what makes you angry and what you don’t like about yourself), the film never quite gets you into that zone or its vicinity.

Remember that last conversation where the narrator tells the storyteller that people want logic and may find it difficult to believe that it was God who called…

Well, in this case, it’s like Sallu after the narration, probably told the makers he would agree if they did exactly the opposite:
“Don’t try to make it realistic, people don’t like logic. They want to see me without a shirt. And Katrina too (but the Censors may not allow that), they want Sajid Wajid ka music, one item song after interval, make out scenes for the multiplex audience… the rest Sohail will take care… Let’s roll.”
*Begins to take his shirt off, humming Just Chill, Chill, Just Chill*

Drona: A stoner film with plenty of substance

October 12, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Far, far away in a European town near Saawariya-pur where even firang folk speak Hindi, a little boy often ridiculed by his step mom and Yo-bro, begins to find solace in the blue stuff that grew around the area.

One day, the kind foster Dad realising that the kid was going bonkers, gives him a towel to keep the blue stuff by telling him: You are not like us. You are special.

Little does the poor lil boy know that ‘special’ was the politically correct usage for being mentally ill. So he continues to find more of the blue stuff every time he’s depressed and soon, the effects began to show.
At first, the hallucinations are small and ordinary… It just makes him feel tickled by a petal. But then as he grows up, things begin to get a little crazy gradually. He can feel the petal talk to him. The petal also plays hide and seek with him and even wipes his ass eyes every time shit happens.

It makes him sweep the pavement (after goons break the display panes of his brother’s store) and soon, he hallucinates that the blue stuff gifts him a heavy-duty gold bracelet. He gets visions of a Gothic-styled Kay Kay Menon talking Urdu-laced Hindi to a gooey clone as the two face off for a facial contortion competition along with a few visual effects he had seen on DVD in recent fantasy films… and the hallucinations soon get a little more wilder when he begins to fantasise about Priyanka Chopra in a turban, driving a yellow Alfa Romeo and kicking ass flaunting cleavage.

After the kind father kicks the bucket, ironically, it’s just the mother who really understands him for who he is. “Druggie kahin ka,” she refers to him affectionately for the benefit of the front-benchers. This is one of the rare few times that director Goldie Behl spells out what’s actually going on.

Otherwise, Drona is like Anurag Kashyap’s ‘No Smoking’ on hash… Or possibly acid, since they seem to call it the ‘Amrit’.

Whatever it is, it’s the good stuff that’s responsible for the screenplay (the same stuff that should rightfully get writing credits for Baba, specifically that thrilling kite-sequence) and substance has led to a lesser known genre going mainstream. It would’ve been unimaginable a few years ago that a mainstream star like Abhishek Bachchan would be sport enough to do a full blown stoner film.

Drona looks like something only David Lynch would’ve got away doing in recent times – nothing is what it seems like at the surface.

Abhishek seems like he’s serious but he’s not.

Kay Kay Menon at the surface may seem like a great actor but then his facial muscles go berserk all through.
Priyanka too has no direct lines of her own in the movie and hence uses the indirect way of expression, starting every sentence with “Babuji kehtey the…”

There are plenty of signifiers and unless you have passed the basic test and successfully deconstructed No Smoking, it is unlikely that you will realise that Priyanka’s attribution is all about the subconscious reminding you of your upbringing and values with which you were brought up with.

Even when you do drugs, the subconscious likes to remind you like a guardian angel manifesting itself through things you have ordinarily liked – curves and cars. But the more addicted you get, the more rebellious you become and start craving to face your fears… Like the young Bruce Wayne from Batman Begins.

Some may even begin to explore alternative sexuality and wear kohl around the eyes and want to spend your birthdays with Riz Raizada (an adequately effeminate Kay Kay Menon), clearly seduced by the charm of evil only to realise that pure evil will stop at nothing to get the pill away from you. Goldie does this with a beautiful scene around interval when Kay Kay Menon makes Abhishek give him the pill – this is also a literal scene where Goldie spells it out visually. And you thought only the Wachowski Brothers would have thought of something like that.

But if you want your freedom, you have to protect the stuff… the Amrit that everybody wants. Crazy wizards to Seven-footer-WWF champions in prosthetics to albino monks from Opus Dei… everybody wants it.

Drona is about protecting your stuff. Marijuana is a legacy left behind by our forefathers and there’s always a Chosen One who has to fight evil forces that want to confiscate it for their own consumption.

I haven’t seen Pineapple Express, but I’m pretty sure it can’t be half as funny or profound as Drona.

Go for Drona adequately stoned. There’s not a chance in hell your stupid brain would understand any of it otherwise. And if you are a No Smoking fan, be warned. You may die of overdose.

Kidnap: Could nap during this chiller

October 5, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Thriller
Director: Sanjay Gadhvi
Cast: Sanjay Dutt, Imran Khan, Minnisha Lamba, Vidya Malavade
Storyline: A young man holds the richest Indian’s daughter captive and gives him a set of tasks and deadlines
Bottomline: Reveals way too much to keep you guessing

“This is a kidnapping. Maine tumhe kidnap kiya hai,” announces Imran trying hard to look like a badass. Minissha giggles in response and so do we.

First, the basic premise of the film is covered in a bikini for most part. So there’s nothing much to guess there but it is fun nonetheless to watch Minissha cavort around in water.

Secondly, the guy holding the basic premise of the film captive hardly looks like he could do serious damage. So there’s nothing to fear when he says ‘Mujhe Revenge Chahiye’ like it’s some new cocktail at the bar.

Finally, the father of the basic premise of the film is the richest Indian alive, which means it shouldn’t be that hard for him to get away even with murder. So it hardly seems like a challenge when he is asked to get to Panvel in 40 minutes because he could’ve easily taken his private chopper or better still, had the lady he’s asked to meet air-lifted.

This film ought to have been called Charity instead of Kidnap for more reasons than Minissha’s service to the deprived. What do you call a man who cooks for you, does your dishes, takes you to pristine beaches for a swim, makes you revisit your childhood home, gets you designer clothes and even cuts your finger nails (and Gadhvi accompanies this with tense music so that we’re scared), brings your divorced parents together and reunites you with your father over the phone, without any financial motivation? In some countries, he’s called the husband.

So when Imran does all of this and you are expected to believe he’s some mean kidnapper, you can’t smile at the innocence of this good Samaritan.

The rat giving the cat something to run for may sound like an exciting sequence but not if you consider that the stuntmen, for the sake of creating a chase, decide that instead of just having one run after the other, have both of them climb a building under construction. For what joy? For a parkour demonstration, of course.

In between these tickles, there’s Vidya Malavade deciding to test our willing suspension of disbelief skills. As Yummy Mummy to Minissha, she also tries to convince us that she can go to a prison all alone in the middle of the night and pass off as a human rights activist on a surprise check. With those clothes, she’s probably fighting for the prisoner’s need for glamour.

For those who care, the storyline goes that a former juvenile delinquent gives a set of tasks accompanied with clues written as bad puns to nursery rhymes for an old man with a paunch. The script thus solely relies on these tasks for the thrills.

The tasks include robbery, jailbreak and murder, all excuses for set-piece action sequences.

At no point does it seem like the situation would chaotically spiral out of control. In fact, evil is conspicuous by absence in this film that doesn’t really want to let its characters slip into dark territory. There’s sexual assault that’s withheld, an interesting premeditated murder twist that gets cancelled as an afterthought, a romance that the makers are scared to explore and a divorce that gets conveniently resolved.

It’s like Gadhvi and Shibani Bhatija do not want to get the drama to get too loud where characters yell ‘Bloody Bastard’ (honestly, that would’ve actually worked in this film because ‘You Arrogant Man’ hardly reflects any serious emotion) nor do they want the drama to get too complex and messy with shades of grey.

Dutt is supposed to be grey because he’s arrogant and Imran is grey because he wants revenge is all that they can come up with and that is certainly not enough to create even an iota of drama or intrigue. Certainly the half-hearted Zinda, though shamelessly ripped off from ‘Oldboy,’ has more character than this wannabe thriller.

Yes, the attempts at slickness by use of English punch lines do sort of make it sound like a bad Hollywood film. Must we add, spoof.

Imran Khan is all right in a few scenes where he has to look menacing but comes across as outright silly when he’s trying to sound threatening. Dutt like always acquits his part with great sincerity but prison life seems to have taken a toll on his fitness. Minissha, for a girl who has to carry the film, gets by with very little.

Maybe at gunpoint, Kidnap will hold you captive.

Gautham Vasudev Menon: On being the man you want to be (Uncut)

October 3, 2008 · by sudhishkamath
Kunal Daswani
Pic: Kunal Daswani

In an orthodox old-fashioned film industry that thrives on star-worship, one man has the spine to call a spade a spade.

Gautham Vasudev Menon has to be the gutsiest of our filmmakers. He’s also the rare professional who is man enough to take criticism with all sincerity.

Yes, man is the word because Vaarnam Aayiram is all about the essence of being the man you look up to, being the man who can sweep the girl off her feet with his strength, poise and courage.

It’s an emotional personal film straight from the heart for Gautham considering it was born out of his father’s death. “Three days after he passed away, I decided I must do this film,” he says.

He had initially pitched the idea of a coming of age tale about a youngster on the verge of life and Suriya was like, “Yeah, but is that it?” Gautham however was confident of convincing him with the screenplay but he just couldn’t focus on writing with his father’s deteriorating health. “We knew we were losing him. I had made Suriya wait really long. So when I finished Pachaikili, I thought I’ll take off for a week just to write because the doctors said my father was going to be Okay. I couldn’t ask the producer if I could show only my Dad the film one week ahead of the release. So I asked if we could have the premiere for the cast and crew and friends. I showed him the film and I left that night to write. Three days later, he passed away.”

“I experienced something when I came back for the funeral. I went through a lot of emotions and when I sat to write the film a week later, I thought I could put all that into the film as a tribute to my father.”

Vaarnam Ayiram, he insists, is not an action film, it’s a coming-of-age drama where boy becomes man.

“Because at every point, when you are young and discovering life and what it’s like… with the evil lurking around the corner or a love that hits you and at every point, I thought that the father could be the inspiration which is how it was for me in my life. I put it together with 75 per cent from my life and 25 per cent from everybody’s life.”

There is no commercial thought that dictated the content, he says. “If you walk out of the film and if it reminds you of your Dad, then I think that’s the success of the film.”

“This is a very meaningful film. It’s high time I made something like that. Pachaikili had a climax for the hero. For Kamal Sir, we gave him a 20 minute intro which wasn’t there in the first script… Everywhere, I was toeing the line. This time, I thought let me make a film that deserves what it needs and nothing more. So I was thankful for someone like Suriya who straightaway said Yes, I love it. This is perfect. I relate to the story.

I am reminded of my Dad. At the Filmfare awards, I remember him calling me and saying: I hugged my Dad on stage after a long time after I worked on this project. I knew people would think it’s for show but I realised it was a great moment to hug him because at home, I’ve never hugged him. So it works for him, it works for me.”

Any influences in making the film?

“If you say it reminds you of Autograph, I would be happy because I love that film and I like Cheran as a filmmaker. I’ve grown up watching Raj Kapoor films because my Dad asked me to watch them. I like the way music wasn’t thrown in and takes the story forward. So those are influences but I’ve not copied any scene from any film. But just like Forrest Gump sits and talks about his past, this is also like that… when a set of memories are triggered off because of an incident and his whole life unfolds before him.”

This is his most realistic film till date. Did he make Suriya starve for the six-pack?

“Definitely not,” he laughs. “When I narrated the script, I said I also wanted to give a small message to youngsters that if at all you are going through a low phase in life,  working out and pushing yourself to the limit might be a good way to overcome anything instead of smoking and drinking. So Suriya said he’ll do a six-pack. But when I saw what he was doing, I told him Don’t do it. There were times he wasn’t eating breakfast and skipping meals. He pushed himself.”

He’s all praise for the actor. “Seriously, the things he does for the director and the film. I have worked with Kamal Sir, so I know what that man is capable of and I can say this… Suriya is there and nobody else is capable of performing like him.”

Gautham also shares a special relationship with Harris Jayaraj. “When I take a project with him, I take it to him from scratch. When I took Pachaikili, he said Don’t do it. Your audience are expecting a big film. This time, we’ve done a Gaana. It’s a first for us. I got up and danced like how Suriya would dance (we hadn’t shot the song) and so I danced like for one minute. He laughed his guts out and then worked the groove out. He trusts me completely and I trust him. We’ve done 35 songs and not even once, have I said I don’t want the song after listening to it.”

Being a successful filmmaker, he has to deal with escalating expectations and uncontrollable hype.
“I don’t think I have a fan base but Pachaikili proved that people have certain expectations from me. That’s when I started thinking maybe you should be careful but then, that’s bad. Because you start writing for the audience and you can’t make a film you want to make. So somewhere you have to balance that.”

Candour and controversy

“My friends tell me don’t talk because the industry doesn’t understand. Maybe they have a point. Like, Vijay doesn’t talk to me now because of the Tamil magazine thing…

I was misquoted. This journalist asked me why I work only with Suriya. So I said that’s not true, I narrated a story to Vijay. He loved it. He laughed as I was narrating it and he said: You know what Gautham, can you put stuff like what I do in the film? Have you seen my films, he asked and gave me a few DVDs for reference?

I had seen those Perarasu’s films. So I immediately I said ‘Vijay, that wont work in the film I narrated because this was meant to be a refreshing love story’. There would’ve been a sensibility disconnect. So I told the journalist I was disappointed when I got home but he went on name Perarasu’s films and made it sound like I was degrading Perarasu’s films, which I was not. I tried to call Vijay to explain but he didn’t see the bigger picture. So sometimes, it is better to keep quiet.

If I don’t like a film, I say it but that wasn’t even the case with the Vijay episode. Even when I said I didn’t like Bheema, it was not about Vikram, it wasn’t meant to be personal. I called Lingusamy to invite him for the audio launch party of Vaarnam and he said he was angry with me. I said it’s okay to be angry but please come. And he said: Okay, I’m coming with a gun. So, he came and we had a good time.”

Read the last interview I did with Gautham before Vettaiaadu Vilayaadu here.

One helluva trip!

September 29, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

I really don’t know where to start.

This post is just for all of you who have been asking me to blog about the trip. With seven travel stories planned, I don’t want to type the whole thing here. But it’s a trip I will cherish for a lifetime for the following reasons:

1. Did Chennai-Frankfurt-Los Angeles (Read: Sunset Blvd, Hollywood, ABC Studios – the home of Lost, Disneyland, Kodak Theatre)-New York (Did two Broadway musicals including Lion King back to back, thanks to Disney)-Pittsburgh (visiting my best friend Murugan)-New York (again for sightseeing, pub-hopping, thanks to Gita and Sheetal)-Frankfurt-Ibiza (Yes, to see the best sunrise in the world)-Paris (should I even say more?)-Amsterdam (Heard of The Flying Pig?)-cut to one missed train to Frankfurt and back to Chennai – all in 19 days! The first leg of the tour was official, on invitation from the Disney Group to get a taste of the Disney Difference first hand and everything from Pittsburgh was part of my personal holiday.

2. Got a Dharma Initiative tattoo done in Pittsburgh. Of course, it hurt like hell but thanks to Murugan and Roshni for having cameras around so that I couldn’t chicken out or show any signs of pain… 🙂 All my fellow Lost fans will be proud of me. I surprised myself because I never thought I would be the kind to pay to get my skin scalded. I guess I was super kicked after meeting Barry Jossen who was nominated for an Emmy for the Lost mobisodes along with the creators Lindeloff and Cuse. And also extra thanks to Murugan and Roshni for taking me for Burn After Reading on the day of the release. Too bad it was a little disappointing though Brad Pitt turned in an awesome extended cameo and Clooney rocked. But come on guys, this is a film the Coens couldve written in their sleep… An assembly-line Coen Brothers film that smacks of Deja Vu every other scene.

3. Sat on the monster rollercoaster California Screamin. Twice (since I held on to railing the first time thinking it is mandatory for security reasons… the second time around was great fun cuz it felt like a free fall) And did every single ride meant for grown ups at Disneyland including the Pirates ride, the Indiana Jones ride, the Finding Nemo submarine ride, the Maliboomer rocket ride that takes you up 1000 ft and drops down half the distance, the Space Mountain ride, the Jungle Cruise and the some kiddy rides too.

4. Smoked half a joint of hash in Amsterdam. Hated it!! Left a bad taste in my mouth and a hole in my pocket. Not literally. Just shopped for some 250 euros in the next half hour buying clothes with no clue about sizes… Instead of me having to choose the clothes… if I buy enough, friends can always choose what they want right? Had to buy a suitcase to put it in and then missed my train because the train left 40 minutes earlier than the time on my ticket because the Germans suck at building reservation systems. Took five trains in the middle of the night to get to Frankfurt to catch my flight back to India.

5. Saw one of the greatest sunsets in the world in Ibiza with 5000 to 10,000 other people (floating population) along the coast standing by Cafe Del Mar (no place to stand, let alone sit). People actually applauded after the sunset. I could see why it is the world’s biggest party island but I hated drunk Brits pissing in the middle of the street like they owned the place. Also, got conned by Torres Hostal on arrival around midnight (Famous words: “Yes you have a reservation with us. But we don’t have a room for you”) and found decent and much better accomodation next street in Cervantes.

6. Walked all around Paris by day and did the pub crawl at night, partied till 2.30 a.m and had a tough time getting a taxi back to the hostel. Mark Benzer, if you’re reading this… This is your wingman wishing you all the best for the rest of your tour! That was fun, brother!

7. Found out why New York City is everybody’s favourite city in the world. I had a blast there. Did the hop on hop off tour along with the cruise by Statue of Liberty, walked the Brooklyn Bridge and got a great view of the skyline and got a taste of the night life there, thanks to Gita. Times Square was all electric energy and when over a hundred Harley Davidson bikers rode on for a promotional rally, I just loved the city a little more. NYC was great except for an Indian cabbie who decided to give our race a bad name. When I asked him why he didn’t put the meter, he earnestly tells me (as the Vacant sign flashes at me): “They’ve introduced a new system, you just have to key in the zip code and it tells you the fare.” Manjeet Singh, shame on you for swiping my card and helping yourself to an unauthorised 25 per cent tip. Yes, I was conned by a Sardar! Okay, no more Sardar jokes from me!

8. Finally set foot into Hollywood as a journalist.  I could see the Kodak Theatre from my studio suite in Renaissance. Yes, Disney took really good care of us, flying us business class and putting us up in some really cool boutique hotels – First The Grafton on Sunset (on Sunset Boulevard of course) and then at the Disney Grand Californian inside Disneyland, Anaheim, Renaissance and Hudson in Manhattan, New York! We met with Disney’s top bosses in Motion Pictures business, ABC (we were at the sets of the Brothers and Sisters TV show), Products, Imagineers at the theme park and even went backstage after the Lion King Broadway musical… Yes, I get paid to do things like this! Well, when work is this tough, what choice do you have but to lie back and enjoy it, huh? 😀

Watch out for my travel stories starting next week.

Post Script: Note to Kutti:

But it wasn’t complete, wasn’t nearly close to being in the same vicinity as complete because I couldn’t share it with you. I couldn’t hear your voice or laugh about it with you. I missed my – I missed my girl…

I love you. You… complete me.

😀

Do critics set out to rip films apart?

September 29, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

It’s been a week that I have been back after my longest holiday in the last few years.

And probably my biggest yet!

Before I post an update on that, I would like to thank my Superbro Raja Sen, one of my two favourite Indian film critics (well, by now I guess most of you regulars here know the other favourite is good old Baddy to friends, Baradwaj Rangan to fans and I know him more as Baradwaj Rangan than Baddy)… Yes, so… Thank you, Raja for endorsing this blog and I hope sincerely that your last column has added a lot more weight to your reputation of being “the most hated Indian online”…

😀

Recently at a film audio launch party, a popular producer-actor told me that he loves the way I “rip” films apart. Now, that’s exactly what the lady who issued me the Schengen visa said when I went for the interview at the German Consulate a month ago. But Umm… Er… I am not sure if that’s any compliment.

I am pretty sure Raja does not enjoy people hating him or writes reviews to be hated or writes reviews simply because he hates the makers.

I certainly do not “rip apart” films or at least haven’t started writing a review because people love/hate to read negative reviews.

It’s just a job that I do to the best of my ability, based on deadlines, prevailing mood at the time of watching and writing, availability of the backgrounders (this also involves watching all films related to the film – originals in case of remakes, rip-offs or tributes, prequels apart from reading interviews, synopsis and production notes… When Revenge of the Sith released, I had a blast watching all the five Star Wars films back to back in one night and when Clone Wars releases, I will have no choice but to watch all six at one go… Yes, I actually get paid for this) And I also write keeping in mind the crowd response and the context of what the filmmaker has tried to do and sometimes with the sole intention of balancing out skewed positive or negative reviews in other mainstream media (so as to say: Come on, it’s not that bad or Hey, it isn’t that good as they tell you)… And there’s the word limit factor that further affects the review – the desk may just deem it fit to remove any explanation of an argument and sometimes may want to play it safe when anything remotely sexual or any kind of slang is mentioned. [Recently, I had referred to Bipasha as Her Hotness in a recent review and found that it had been changed it to “Miss Hot” (sic!)]

With so many things to worry about including memory in case of forgettable films, I clearly do not have the talent to also manufacture negativity and humour along with all that mandatory analysis that’s required in a review.

It is foolish to even try to make every review a funny one or a negative one when your word limit is packed with the bare essentials – which consists of why the film works or why it doesn’t, along with instances, singling out departments or individuals that stood out for whatever reasons, a basic storyline avoiding spoilers, an overview of what the film, the cast and the crew achieves and a summary or suggestion of what the reader is supposed to do after reading the review.

Let me clarify – I am not even hinting that all this is difficult. I just mean to say that a reviewer cannot afford to stick to or be bound by one additional parameter when he has so many of these other things to do. Which is why I don’t try to make every review of mine funny or negative. Just like how every film is unique, it deserves a review that it truly deserves – a review that does justice to all the effort gone into making the film or in watching it.

Tamil Cinema: The new wave

September 10, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Remember 2007, when boys next door turned a pin-code into a phenomenal cult film on street cricket? And a film about a girl who cannot talk spoke volumes about the intelligence and evolution of modern day audiences.
Venkat Prabhu and Radha Mohan showed the way last year and now, we have a whole new brave generation of filmmakers ready to show the box office that it is good scripts that make films work, stars or no stars.
Though star-struck audiences still buy into hype and practice idol worship, this year Mysskin with Anjaathey and Sasikumar with Subramaniyapuram have provided further proof that the audience for Tamil cinema has come a long way.
With half a dozen offbeat films from young, promising filmmakers in the cans, we decided to sample some of the blue-blood and got these filmmakers together for a photo-shoot at Sathyam Cinemas recently.
Snatches from the conversation.

Krishnan Seshadri Gomatam

“The market has exploded. It has changed,” swears Krishnan Seshadri Gomatam, director of Muthal Muthal Muthal Varai, smartly abbreviated to a market savvy ‘M3V’.

“Earlier, we used to make a movie for the mass. Today, with the IT boom and the impact of globalisation, attitudes have changed. People have more exposure to International content. The mood is upbeat,” he explains why he believes that the audience is ready for a new genre of films.

“The hero-heroine-villain kind of thing is getting old. That’s not the only kind of films people want to see. Today, you can concentrate, target people and talk only to them, thanks to the multiplexes. Satyajit Ray’s cinema reflected a different kind of India. Today, it’s all about celebration of life.”

Unlike regular male dominated films, in M3V, you can expect the girl to play a role that’s as important as the guy. “The hero of my film has no qualms about getting help from the girl to achieve is dream. Men and women are stepping into what used to be considered exclusive domain. Our films need to reflect that change,” he says.

M3V starring Satyajit, Anuja Iyer, Charan and Keevna is set to release this month.

Vijay

What made someone who made a hardcore Thala film to venture into a territory reserved for the underdog filmmakers?

“It is only content that matters today,” says Vijay, speaking about his Khosla Ka Ghosla remake ‘Poi Solla Porum’ all set to release on September 12.

“I want to do different kinds of films. If I do ten films in my life, I should’ve dabbled in ten different genres,” he says.

There are advantages and disadvantages of working with experienced actors and stars. “They are professionals, they know how to portray characters. There is little you have to tell them. But when you are working with newcomers, everything is your responsibility. But I had a blast working on ‘Poi Solla Porum’. I was able to experiment on a lot of things.”

Vijay is an advocate of change. “Tamil cinema definitely needs a change otherwise it will get monotonous. Hollywood has different genres. People are welcoming the new kind of cinema. That’s a good sign. We have to make sensible movies.”

Poi Solla Porum starring Nedumudi Venu, Nasser, Karthik Kumar, Pia, Om and Bosskey is about a group of underdogs who take on a powerful land shark.

Anita Udeep

She made her first film in English. “Knock, Knock, I Am Looking To Marry” ran a record six weeks when the multiplex culture had just set in and now she’s done with eighty per cent of the shoot of her Tamil debut ‘Kulir 100’.

“I think I understand the balance between what I want to do and what will click with the audience,” says Anita Udeep, who also has an animation feature ‘Gullivers Travel’ to her credit.

“If you can work out the economics backwards and make a film, you can make something that you really like, something that’s your style, something without compromise that will appeal to people… But you have to also look at a way where you make money. But I am sure there will be so many people like me who will want to watch a different kind of film.”

Anita’s film Kulir 100 is about a bunch of six high-schoolers. “It’s not the regular kind of high school comedy with sexual innuendoes or puppy love. I’ve tried to capture the vulnerability of that phase of being 17-years old when your mind is not stable, it is constantly wavering.”

Kulir 100 features Sanjeev, Ria, Karthik, Akash, Ritish and Syed is all set for a Diwali release.

Viji

Vellithirai was one of the most candid films made on the film industry itself, a critique on the state of the art. Did it go down well with his fraternity?

“I think they enjoyed the film and the characters. There was no negative feedback since I had not attacked anyone specific,” says Viji, who is readying up the script for his new film for Mirchi Movies.

There will always be two aspects to the business – art and commercial, he says. “The commercial films will use stars and there are also good things about that too. I employ humour to make it more commercially savvy.”

Viji too wants to make all kinds of films. “But the films should represent the times. We can’t recycle the same plots. The angry young man may not be completely relevant today,” he says.

Viji’s yet to be titled film tries to capture the change in attitude through the story of four boys and four girls. “Be it the joint family system, the father-son-family relationships or girl-boy interaction, everything has changed over the years. We have to make our cinema contemporary,” he says. “Yes, the public wants something different. The climate has changed. I can’t say the total trend has changed. But different films also are working.”

Gayathri-Pushkar

“For us, doing a different kind of film is as important as making a film commercially work,” says Gayathri, also speaking for Pushkar. The duo’s Oram Po may not have set the box office on fire but it was received well by critics and the people who watched it.

“Seventy per cent of commercial films fail. Somewhere you have to look at it from the audience point of view and see if people will enjoy it. And you need to have your unique voice with something new to say,” she explains.

Stars do make things a lot easier, adds Pushkar. “If you get a star, you automatically you get a producer. Let’s say you have a story that needs a certain kind of budget to get it realised and if you have a strong vision, you need to get a star. The onus is then on your head to go get the star and convince him.”
The duo are currently scripting their new film ‘Raakozhi.’ “Our films are a light-hearted take on life, that reflect the time and space the characters…We like the story to be rooted in the local milieu. We’re strongly against delivering messages. We don’t have that kind of life experience. Also, you wont be seeing dramatic situations, melodrama or major crying in our films. Stay away from melodrama is one of our mantras.”

Sasikumar:
What gave him the guts to make a non-glamourous realistic film set in the eighties and have nothing else but pictures of four unkempt bearded men on the posters?

“The story made me,” says Sasikumar, director of Subramaniyapuram. “I told myself whatever it is, do or die. You got to prove yourself. This is the age we can take risks. We shouldn’t compromise.”

Sasikumar wanted to go back to the origin of the angry young man. “The eighties was when it all started. The unemployed youth became misguided and took to rowdyism. Also, we have not had flashback films that went so back in time. I was confident that people who are over 35 would want to see it out of curiosity.”

Though he is a fan of Ram Gopal Varma, he says that his cinema is derived from real life. “The raw violence you see in the film is something I took from Madurai. It still happens. Violence is like that. If you read the crime stories in newspapers there, you will get gory details on how murders are committed.”

“There are different ways to drive home a point. You can say anything with love or create fear. With Subramaniyapuram, I wanted to scare and show the consequences of a violent path.”
Sasikumar will now be seen acting in Samudirakanni’s “Nadodigal”. “Again, it is a non-formula film. The Kathai is the hero.  We are starting shoot in September.”

His next directorial venture goes on floors in February 2009.

Rock On: Totally Rockin’

September 6, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Musical
Director: Abhishek Kapoor
Cast: Farhan Akhtar, Arjun Rampal, Purab Kohli, Luke Kenny, Prachi Desai, Koel Puri
Storyline: Four friends who are part of a rock band called Magik fall apart until one day, ten years later, life offers them a second chance.
Bottomline: A rock-version of Dil Chahta Hai-meets-Jhankaar Beats in an incredibly solid ensemble film.

Rock on is predictable from start to the supers in the end that will tell us what happened to each of the band members and is certainly not the film you ought to watch after the spoof ‘Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story.’

Because, Rock On has every single element synonymous with the sub-genre of rock-movies – a band that has fallen apart must get together to redeem itself.

But it’s not the What that matters in a movie like Rock On, it’s the How.

And How it works!

Gloriously at that, hitting the right notes with the restraint and understatement, a sensibility we are now attuned to expect from the Farhan Akhtar brand of cinema. Director Abhishek Kapoor is completely in control, backed by Farhan Akhtar’s effectively incisive dialogues that take us right into the mind of the characters, not to forget the powerhouse performances from the entire ensemble.

The film does get indulgently slow down towards in the middle when it delves into what went wrong with the band, but by then you’re already in love with the mood and the feel of Rock On. Cinematographer Jason West, take a bow.

With the classic golden sephia tones and the saturated colours created in a sea of swaying arms, the flashbacks feel like a Woodstock documentary set in Mumbai.

You can completely relate to the boys, their dilemmas and where the conflict stems from, through the nuances and body language of the characters, with the filmmaker rarely ever resorting to theatrics, melodrama or cinematic exaggeration.

Rock On is a nostalgic ode to an era when rock musicians could be spotted with their long hair. Yes, they did smoke up, they had their groupies but that wasn’t all they did.

It maybe a little unfair to compare this with Cameron Crowe’s ‘Almost Famous’ that went behind the scenes and deep into the minds of pig-headed power-drunk rockstars because rockstars in India are anything but that.

Because Rock On is the definitive film on the state of Indian rock. Rockstars in India are small-time survivors, consumed by the angst of their struggle against odds, playing for what they believe in and bound together by friendship and music, more than anything else. And Rock On is spot on when it comes to exploring these issues.

Shankar Ehsaan Loy’s music is the backbone of this film. The songs work ‘Magik’ when you watch them within the film, grow on you and may just convince you pick up a CD. It’s raw, fresh and full of life. And once you’ve seen the movie, it will also trigger memories of the film.

There is so much to rave about Farhan Akhtar’s performance. He’s emerged out to be one of India’s finest actors in the film, brooding with aggressive intensity, employing his voice modulation to bring out the anguish, compared to a superbly restrained Arjun Rampal who lets his eyes do all the talking with his mellowed down angst-ridden countenance. Purab Kohli is delightfully charming and fun and is almost solely responsible for the laughs in the film while Luke Kenny underplays the level-headed, strong-minded introvert with great panache. The women in the film Prachi Desai, Koel Puri and especially Sahana Goswami are solid in their support roles.

Even the most predictable scenes are delivered with utmost sincerity and the sync sound breathes so much life into even the most used plot devices.

Unfortunately though this multiplex film has limited urban appeal and one can only wish that it stays long enough to get the audience it deserves.

Book your ticket now and Rock On.

Mumbai Meri Jaan: The blasts that shook them alive

September 5, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Drama
Director: Nishikant Kamat
Cast: Paresh Rawal, R.Madhavan, Kay Kay, Soha Ali Khan, Vijay Maurya
Storyline: One week in the life of Mumbaiites from different walks of life in the aftermath of the Mumbai blasts.
Bottomline: Glimpses of genius

Nishikant Kamat has to be among the most promising of our filmmakers today.

Mumbai Meri Jaan breaks your heart a few times, chokes you in fits and starts and is one of the most sincere films of our times.

Yes, it is a little overwritten, slow, disjointed and even gets a little repetitive but this is a solid attempt at introducing powerhouse drama through subtlety.

Ironically, the only parts that do not work are those where Kamat tries to use his cinematic licence to exaggerate for the sake of drama.

For instance, we understand Irrfan’s character lives on the fringes of the society, often ignored and insulted. Yet, well after establishing that, Kamat feels the need to show it visually and so he exaggerates to show him humiliated in front of his family for daring to walk into a multiplex and trying on perfume.
But then, how many Indian filmmakers have dared to handle a complex ensemble socio-political commentary film like Crash or Babel?

Though Mumbai is nowhere as subtle as Babel or as clever as Crash, Kamat’s film is all heart. It borrows the parallel-narratives-stitched-together structure of the Paul Haggis film and the ‘everything is connected’ thread of the Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu’s masterpiece and yet peoples it with characters that represent different walks of life in the countries cultural capital.

In the wake of the blasts, the state of the State is represented by a flawed, ineffective cop about to retire (Paresh Rawal in a career best) and a young policeman (Thank you again, Nagesh Kukunoor, for giving us Vijay Maurya) disillusioned with his role in the corrupt system.

The ideal conscientious citizen (R.Madhavan reprises his character from Kamat’s ‘Evano Oruvan’) loses it here too but at a completely, wholly believable level – he may just want to opt out of the system.

The also film takes us to the root of the issue – more than that of ideology or religion –public perception and the politics of vendetta (no one could’ve fit the bill better than Kay Kay Menon), the role of the media (Soha Ali Khan cries like she was born for this role) represented through a TV journalist who becomes the prime exhibit of the circus and the consequence of apathy and indifference towards the minority which could turn the most innocent man into a sadistic soul taking his revenge on the society (Irrfan Khan is reliably solid).

Mumbai Meri Jaan, thankfully, is not a rose-tinted perspective of a city that rose on its feet on the day of the blasts and its undying spirit (as the TV channels packaged it). The film is, in fact, a reality check. There are no easy solutions offered and the individual stories are resolved with credible doses of realism and hope.

Unlike his first film Dombivli Fast, Mumbai… is only border-line dark.

Now, there will always be art-lovers who would have liked this film to end on a stark, depressing note. But political filmmaking transcends something you put up for approval from art critics. By genre, it is for you to express what you have to say on the issue.

And Kamat so well sums it up in a cameo: “Terrorism is a part of our reality and our children will get used to it… Earlier tourists came to see the twin towers. Now, they come to see Ground Zero.”

Phoonk: RGV makes another boo-boo

September 4, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Horror
Director: Ram Gopal Varma
Cast: Sudeep, Amruta Khanvilkar, Ahsaas Channa
Storyline: A builder’s child becomes the victim of black magic after her Dad fires a witch
Bottomline: Hamming hits new highs

The only horror in Phoonk is how much Ram Gopal Varma makes his actors ham. Especially, the fabulous four who were the mainstay of the Ramsay Brothers brand of horror.

The Scary Old Lady: Ram Gopal Varma’s old lady can’t talk without shaking her head. That lady’s consistently disapproving expression sort of sums up the audience reaction to the film.

The Kohl-Eyed-Witch: Tight close-ups of over-the-top animated expressions have the hall in splits. Entertaining yes, scary no.

The Freak Watchman: The camera keeps cutting back to his squint-eyed ‘I could be a psycho’ stares all through the film for subtle reminders that he maybe a freak.

The Baba Black Sheep Killer: Horror of horrors, Zakir Hussain takes home the honours in breaking new ground in Hamville as the miracle man – the baba who can kill and generate cornball special effects – the conveniently quick fix solution to this horror tale.

Nothing wrong in employing such visual loudness in a horror film but the reason this doesn’t work in RGV’s latest is because the filmmaker also wants to be subtle at the same time and scare us with close-ups of, among other things – a stress-ball, Spiderman and an E.T. stuffed toy.

We get the idea behind the ‘What if there was life in all sorts of idols?’ If God resides inside an idol or a poster and people believe that from the bottom of their hearts, could there be life inside other shapes and objects too, say, in ominous looking statues? But that idea too goes unexplored, and is reduced to a style-sheet gimmick of icons in the foreground of every other scene before the camera shifts focus to the action in the background.

The science versus superstition debate works at a superficial level, limited to a couple of conversations on faith with absolutely no new perspective on the issue. Probably because RGV himself isn’t acquainted with the significant difference in being an atheist and being agnostic. Atheism, by no means, is a scientific stance simply because just like you cannot scientifically prove God exists, you cannot prove He does not exist.

Sudeep isn’t a bad actor and if he were agnostic, he could’ve come across as a level-headed relatable man of science at the beginning of the film.

Amruta looks like she just stepped out of a TV soap and the child actor Ahsaas Channa looks believably tormented.

The omnipotent crow, supposed to be one of the main performers in the film, is just a glorified extra on the set, offering absolutely zero scares.

So is there anything at all that will scare you?

Yes, thank God for the filmmaker who invented The Dream Cheat and for all the guys who made films on exorcism.

But again, ‘It’s just a dream’ cheats work best when used once. When RGV resorts to repetition, you can tell a man who has run of ideas.

The only other explanation for this film to be this bad is that black magic really exists. And someone’s cast a nasty spell on RGV’s filmmaking.

Page 27 of 90 « Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 90 Next »
  • Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...