• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • December 2025
    M T W T F S S
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
    « Dec    
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Browsing Category Archives

Website under construction.

Kaminey: Sons of guns have a blast

August 18, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Let’s say Guy Ritchie came up with yet another narrative bustling with a motley crew of characters whose paths cross in their quest for MacGuffins (we know how Guy loves multiple MacGuffins).

What if, the Coen Brothers then took over to add a few bizarre touches to this structure, made the oddball characters seem real, and added a touch of philosophy to make this pulp fiction look like a commentary on human nature.

And then, let’s say Quentin Tarantino took that material, rubbed his hands in glee and played around with the linearity of storytelling restricting his “answers first, questions later” approach strictly within individual sequences that play out chronologically, all building up to an end – which all these filmmakers love – That Bloody Mexican Standoff.

Now, imagine what happens when Vishal Bhardwaj exorcises their ghosts, shakes off those multiple personalities, and does to that material what he did to Shakespeare through his earlier films: Reinterpret the characters by rooting them firmly in a credible Indian milieu and make everything about that world come alive.

What you get is a movie where every single character, including the littlest of boys, turns out to be a dirty rotten scoundrel. A film where even the nicest ones stay grey.

Read the rest of the review on the official site
Sons of guns have a blast

Shared via AddThis

Love Aaj Kal: Jab We Split, Socha Na Tha…

August 6, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Green Goblin (to Spider-Man): “But the one thing they love more than a hero is to see a hero fail, fall, die trying. In spite of everything you’ve done for them, eventually they will hate you. Why bother?”

Dear Imtiaz Bhai,

When you did Socha Na Tha, you were the underdog. We critics love the underdog, because we like to pride ourselves on discovering a hero. When you did Jab We Met, despite a limited actor like Shahid Kapoor and an over-enthusiastic Kareena, we gave you a thumbs-up because you proved us right. You were the hero we said you were. You could entertain us with your charm and your writing was fresh.

Then as you readied up your third film shot at lavish budget (FYI, critics like myself hate big budget films because we rarely get the money to make the films we want to make), we sharpened our pencils.

And you defy us further by not casting Kareena in a Saif production. Obviously we are going to hit out at you at the slightest excuse.

So Viren can ask Aditi “Yeh kaunsa angle hai,” because it was your first film. But today when you make Jai ask Veer Singh “Aapka angle kya hai” you are trying hard to please the SMS generation with some phrase nobody has ever used. Does not work. Sorry. Only Farah Khan and Karan Johar have the licence to make their heroines come up with cool catch phrases like “A-void” or “Whatever”.

And suddenly, we realise that your conversation films have too much dialogue in them. How dare they, when they are supposed to have Kathakkali.

But then, we are critics, we need to find something to pick on to keep our jobs and reputation in tact.

Even mango people today turn armchair critics thanks to free blogs and a little time. No word limit restrictions, free hai. (That explains this long post)

We understand that ‘song and dance’ is an alienation technique employed by Indian filmmakers to constantly remind us that we are just watching a movie but that does not stop us from finding “logical errors” in the film – like why did a racist attack lead to a guy being beaten up and even going into the specificities of the choreography of this attack. It didn’t matter in Dilwale Dulhaniya that Shah Rukh Khan got beaten to pulp and spat out blood before the patriarch changed his mind but when a racist punk bites a hand in Love Aaj Kal, it’s deliciously funny.

Green Goblin was right, you know. Some of us are desperate to see you fail.

But there are the cynics and there are the romantics. And some of us in the criticism business happen to review with our Dil rather than Dimaag.

So Imtiaz Bhai, seriously, nobody seems to know the confused generation more than you do. If you were a girl, I would’ve said: Tu Hamesha Correct Baat Bolti Hai, Jaaneman.

In Socha Na Tha, a confused dreamer Viren fell in love with a practical Aditi on the verge of proposing to his girlfriend of three years and wrecked havoc on three families – his, his girlfriends and hers. The dreamer turned practical and the practical girl dared to dream.

In Jab We Met, a workoholic Aditya met a full of life Geet when he’s on the brink of suicide and she’s on her way to elope. He finds his life back on track during an unexpected road trip that takes him to the heartland of India and realises there is no right or wrong when you fall in love while she finds her life derailed and turns into a hardcore cynic. Again, all you did was switch the character graph quite predictably but nobody complained because we were having fun.

The heart versus head conflict is back on a more intimate scale in Love Aaj Kal – a modern take on romance in a world that’s finally rid itself of warring families (Again, nobody had a problem with the age old conflict of families that don’t get along in Socha Na Tha) and the old need to manufacture parental consent (DDLJ to Jab We Met).

But this is the I, Me, Myself generation post Dil Chahta Hai and all we care is for ourselves.

What would have happened if Dev D instead of taking to alcohol, mindlessly just kept skipping from one relationship to another to escape his reality? But you are no Anurag Kashyap, you love life and like to find moments of fun even in the most serious situations.

I totally related to that. I remember once how I completely convinced an old girlfriend that it was only practical that we part ways because of the distance and immediately after that, held her tight to say: No, please cancel that. Forget I said it. It was the funniest moment to have happened in the middle of a break-up but it did. It always does because life has those unpredictable moments. And it’s moments like that, that make your film everybody’s story – the story of mango people.

I love how you rather beautifully employ the great confusion of our times (Man versus Himself) to explore how the young and the restless look at romance. We want all the good parts and when it comes to the tricky parts that may potentially cause pain, we want to hit the Escape button.

After the easy going Jai (Saif) and the grounded Meera (Deepika) have decided to part ways, Jai stifles his angst by pumping up the volume on his car stereo. As the dancers break into ‘Twist,’ I love how you turn the film temporarily into a full-fledged musical – Jai’s magic world of escape, freedom and beauty. Now I wonder why some of us who had a problem with a racist punk biting an arm didn’t have a problem with a street-side carnival where firangs danced to a Hindi track. Oh wait, they did. Because this is a realistic biopic type ka docudrama and it surely couldn’t have happened, right?

I am a huge fan of subversion and I loved how you completely subverted the notion of post-relationship-trauma and turned it into a celebration, yet making it a bitter-sweet moment. Yes, because breakups happen quite often and in this age of rising divorce rates, people are less likely to kill themselves over a break up.

So I love the fact that Jai believes he has no heart and keeps running away from pain, turning every occasion to brood into a full-blown celebration. He throws a break up party, becomes best friends with his ex, even gives her tips to get a new boyfriend, gets himself a new girlfriend and does everything that brings him instant happiness.

One such effort to escape his pain brings him to Delhi where he rediscovers what it was like to be with Meera. And the confusion continues.

I also like how you contrast Jai by introducing us to an older Veer (Rishi Kapoor), the eternal romantic who wooed his love Harleen (Giselle is such a beauty, who wouldn’t go to Calcutta chasing her) in the sixties, the good-old fashioned way, literally following his dream miles away and found focus in life just so that he can afford to be with her and the irony of today’s career-chasing rats racing towards depression.

Love Aaj Kal is essentially a conversation between Jai and Veer (the young and the old) and how they look at romance. You sure are aware of the restlessness of modern day audience. The dialogue is snappy and the scenes well snipped as the young continue to lose and find love till they finally find themselves.

I also love that simple beautiful moment when Jai fondly pokes Meera and she pokes him back and scenes after they’ve broken up, Jai stands with his new foreign girlfriend and pokes her hoping to get that familiar experience from his new girlfriend. He takes her to their old haunts, hoping she could substitute Meera.

Saif Ali Khan delivers the performance of his career and even the dollish Deepika Padukone shines with her understatement and naturalism (though Kareena fans may staunchly disagree and I am glad Meera is not an overenthusiastic chatterbox). I mean I just loved these actors delivering two of the finest scenes ever filmed in recent times – one where Jai walks up to the tell Meera on her wedding day that he’s really OK and that she shouldn’t worry for him and then goes on to vocalise the confusion in his head and the immediate one where Meera tells her husband on their honeymoon that she made a mistake.

Love Aaj Kal is an intense rollercoaster of romance drama and luckily for the sappy ones in the hall, you have kept the mood light, never running out of laughs, even in the film’s darkest moments; scenes a Karan Johar would’ve used to milk your tear-ducts dry.

Indian mainstream cinema has not seen a more contemporary love story. It’s a complete film; the dialogues are breezy and refreshingly candid, there’s not a song out of place, the smart choreography adds to the richness of the narrative, the editing keeps it tight, and the visuals are rich with metaphors – if the Purana Qila epitomises old world romance how interesting that Meera is the restoration artist.

I think it’s because we overanalyse our relationships so much that we have ended up dissecting romance even in our movies. We focus on the flaws and miss out on the larger beautiful picture.

So from one romantic to another: Thank you so much Imtiaz, for this beautiful moving picture. Thank you very much.

Luck: This four letter word film makes That four letter word film look good!

July 25, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Warning: Review contains spoilers… But what can I possibly spoil for you that Soham already hasn’t?

By now, we’ve all heard how Luck is so bad that this four letter word has become synonymous with unprintable profanity.

It’s only fair that we inaugurate this new abuse by showering its creator Soham Shah.

Luck man! Luck you for making this luck-all film. It’s so lucking lame. For luck’s sake, keep the luck away from cinema halls because the poor luckers who paid for it will beat the luck outta you. It truly lucks.

Cheap shots aside, a question.

What do you call a monkey that broke into the Louvre and came out stealing a photograph of Mona Lisa?

Okay, all right, now you don’t want to call yourself names but dude, apologies are in order.

I’m sorry I mistook you for a thief. Now, I know you aren’t smart enough to steal 13 Tzameti. Or from any of the other films you broke into for inspiration – The Condemned, Intacto or Unbreakable.

There’s a theory that stupid people are not capable of evil because planning requires intelligence.

Considering that you’ve taken the central plot of innocent young man in dire need of money finding his way into a human betting racket, the crucial Russian Roulette scene at the middle of the second act and even helped yourself to the number 13 from its Imran Khan-type protagonist Georges Babluani, I see you were excited about something from 13 Tzameti enough to go shop-lifting, but it’s just that you had no clue how to steal it, did you?

Now, I don’t need to tell you what kind of a loser gets caught without even stealing?

13 Tzameti/Luck

There was surely a reason why 13 Tzameti was minimalist by design.

Gela Babluani took a good 40 minutes to set-it up (though the film itself is only 90 odd minutes) before the guy knew what he was getting into. Since we had travelled that journey with him, our hearts pounded with nervous anxiety when we, like him, suddenly realised what the stakes were.

The indoors added to the claustrophobia, the black and white instantly gave it a moody noir feel and it was the sheer atmospherics and the voltage of tension that had us by our balls – not just the Russian Roulette situation by itself but the suddenness of it in his clueless pursuit of an opportunity.

He gets into it unwittingly and realises there’s no exit and we are with him till the end because we care for this poor ill-fated bastard.

13 Tzameti is all about Luck too (Gela finds so many ways to keep playing with the number 13 and its variants – the clock at the train station says 13:00, the car number is 13 13, the hero’s own number in the betting game is 13, the locker number is 103 and so on) but what keeps that film unpredictable is that we do not know how luck will change.

In fact, Luck plays a poetic lead role in Tzameti. Anything could happen in this film. There’s a real imminent danger that this young man could die at any point in the film.

In Luck, we are assured and guaranteed that nothing can happen to those who have been born lucky and lived invincible – Like the hero of Shyamalan’s Unbreakable.

Right there, we stop caring for this bloke because we know that mainstream Hindi cinema constraints dictate that he ends up alive. Poor Imran is the biggest casualty of poor screenwriting. He’s clueless about his character-graph and at no point does he seem to face any sort of hurdle or difficulty in going from round to round. We also know when he saves the girl’s life – not once but thrice – that this girl aint gonna die even if she can’t act to save her life. Or maybe she’s supposed to look that way – emotionless, hiding pain in that nubile body, all goth and tattoo – but the writers forgot to go into the details.

So Shruti goes on to prove that genes have got nothing to do with acting and goes about her lines like a Hindi-speaking robot. The only explanation for this weird acting is that she’s pretending to be someone else.

From the moment she’s introduced without a back-story (the other characters get a sequence each summing up their history – like a shoddy reality show on TV), we know there’s a twist waiting… Oh God, what could it be? An undercover cop?

But then, why is she wasting her time swimming around and killing innocent people helplessly if all she cared for was to kill the man responsible for her twin sister’s death?

Does not matter, we know she won’t die because it would render the hero’s efforts of saving her thrice meaningless.

The high point of this film is a touching scene between Mithun and Chitrashi Rawat – one where she shows us how she can make the silliest lines feel genuine and a super-fine Mithun gets all moist-eyed with so much conviction that makes you think if he’s just wondering looking at Chitrashi: Why can’t saala Mimoh act like this?

Now, we are left hoping at least Mithun and Chitrashi Rawat will die but the minute the four of them hold hands like an underdog hockey team, we are like: WTF! So is there anybody who will die in this supposedly dangerous deadly game?

Even the villain doesn’t seem to die. The grey guys in shades – Sanjay Dutt (who’s contractually bound to walk only in slow mos) and Danny Denzongpa end up too charming, so Soham has no heart to kill them off either.

So does anybody die at all?

Yes, of course, the foreign extras die, round after round, some of them after spouting bad Hindi dialogue. Since when did we care for dying extras?

In fact, nobody from the main cast or their dying relatives die in the course of the film. And as the first frame informs us, even the animals in the film were treated with love and care and were filmed in the presence of veterinarians.

Lucky sons of bitches – they all got paid fat cheques, got to tour Bangkok and South Africa, did parasailing, went deep see diving and even got to run on top of trains… What fun!

But Soham Shah, you are the luckiest bastard – you didn’t even have to hurt your brain cells making this one.

And, yes, you are forgiven for trying to steal 13 Tzameti. Dumb-fuck.

Jashnn: Or how the Bhatts remade Rock On

July 17, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Drama
Director: Raksha Mistry & Hasnain S Hyderabadwala
Cast: Adhyayan Suman, Anjana Sukhani, Shahana Goswami, Humayun Saeed
Storyline: Wannabe popstar overcomes all odds the good old Bollywood way
Bottomline: Not half as bad as you thought

It’s a story that’s been done to death. An age old story that makes the film roll out like a death sentence. One that urgently needs to be listed as a criminal offense just so it becomes illegal to make one more film about a wannabe musician overcoming odds.

So what makes a film with all the trappings of third-degree torture
barely watchable?

Unfortunately, you have to see this film to believe the quality of acting.

Jashnn packs some of the finest performances this year. No, not you, Adhyayan Suman, sit down now.

Read the whole review here on the official site.

Kambakkth Ishq: No laughing matter this

July 15, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

This is the official review I wrote since Borat’s English isn’t good enough for the paper.

I’m hardly offended by politically incorrect jokes. I am all for exploitation cinema. I like Akshay and Kareena, even loved Tashan. Dare I admit, I also dug parts of Chandni Chowk to China. And, I believe t hat the shamelessly sexist Borat is the funniest film in recent times.

Yet, when I hear Akshay Kumar defend this horror film by suggesting that even The Hangover was full of gross jokes, I feel the need to thwack him on the back of his head and say: Dude, look up subversive in the dictionary.

And Sabbir, your vocabulary seems to suggest that your sense of humour, to use a polite word, is asinine. But that’s not really a bad thing.

This insanely stupid remake of Pammal K Sambandam (Come on, it WAS funnier on TV) is no battle of the sexes. It’s ‘Taming Of The Shrew By The Village Pervert Who Got Lucky To Find Himself On A Plane To Hollywood.’ Business class, at that.

Read the full review here.

Shortkut: Kisske baap ka Con?

July 10, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Comedy
Director: Neeraj Vora
Cast: Akshaye Khanna, Arshad Warsi, Amrita Rao
Storyline: Struggling filmmaker must make a film with an old friend
who stole his script and became a Superstar overnight
Bottomline: The film itself is emblematic of the conflict in it –
Hypocritical filmmaking!

For a film that’s supposed to be a satire on how the film industry works and what it takes to protect your vision from the big bad world of formula, Shortkut ends up an extremely dishonest film. But yes, it is passably entertaining too.

Right from stealing the tagline and the climax from ‘Bowfinger: The Con Is On,’ ‘Shortkut: The Con Is On’ is one big con job and more so if you’ve seen any of the earlier versions it is based on – Bowfinger (where a struggling filmmaker makes his film despite all odds and Hollywood conventions), Udayanaanu Thaaram (where a struggling filmmaker makes his film despite all odds and Malayalam film industry conventions), Vellithirai (where a struggling filmmaker makes his film despite all odds and Tamil film industry conventions).

Apparently, the filmmakers did not credit the original writer-director Roshan Andrews (who wrote the Malayalam version) for story after buying the rights to the film. Roshan ought to be pleased with that because this movie does not have half the heart of the earlier films.

Also, it helps to NOT have a legal notice in your hands just in case the studio that produced Bowfinger finds out about the copyright infringement of their official tagline.

So, apart from the inspired making and production aspects, what’s
wrong with Shortkut?

Okay, read the whole review here on the official site.

Kambakkth Ishq: Very Nice. Not. I make a joke. Ha ha.

July 4, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Wawa-weewah!

My Name-a Borat Sagdiyev. I make note this moviefilm reviewings for my very excite friend Sudermans who has gone to make purchase American porno star Denise Richard. She’s very cheap, has shave below and looks like Pamela CJ Andersons two sizes small but with same lovely hairs, pearly teeth and red water panties. He tell me: Borat, If she acted in this, she would even be willing to play midget at the circus.

Till he buy her for his moviefilm, I explain my findings for make benefit your time, money and water.

I went to make a shit three times while watching this a moviefilm – two times because I was most bored, one times when I take photo of old woman who went to clean vagine. She not like movie very much.

In Kazhaksthan, moviefilm is 20 minutes – man enters cage, makes sexytime with wife, close cage. Easy on anoos.

In US and A, moviefilm 100 minute but you can have handparty three times. Hi-fi.

Indian moviefilm is a hundred and feefty seeksty minute long because of rituals name dialogue, dance and drama.

Indian woman educate, she speak a lot, she dance. Very nice. She shake well, she has milky teets, no hair, she shave body and talk, talk, talk, talk… yak yak yak.

But I could not concentrates on what this Bebo and her ladyfrend Arora who not like clothe was saying. I could not a wait for them to make sexytime as lesbian. But it not happen.

Indian pervert Kumar is Pussy magnet from a Punjab who harvest his pubis and other hairs on his body. But I not understand why he not just rape or make sexytime with this Bebos early? He only grab her and kiss her. Yes, it is a legal to force yourself on a ladies if you are Indian hero.

This Kumars for some reason press his mouth to Bebo’s mouth six seven times. It looks like a kiss but he is very much afraid to use tongues, teets or put hand inside vagine.

Woman walk free la la la la without leg chain or cage as common practices in Kazhakhstan. And sometime in US and A when a woman chain me to bed, when phenis gain entry into vagine, she scream Yes, Yes, Yes and she call me Oh God Oh God Oh God. Later, she want me to ask about Who is your Daddy and give beatings on her anoos.

But Kumar not do that since he is a homosexual and stunt prostitute. One time, at the airports, Bebo… naughty, naughty… makes a genuine chocolate face man gain entry to his asshole to look for drug and make his anoos hang loose like mouth of tired dog.

This Bebo is much educate doctor and is proves government scientist Yamak who said woman brain is small size of squirrel. She leave watch in his stomach with Indian disco dance music and result in him become retard like my brother Bilo. He tear his hair and scream Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah… She later sleep with him Ha Ha *NOT* (Ha Ha I make a *NOT*  joke I learned in comedy class… It is good *NOT*? Ha ha… I make another joke *NOT* ) She remove her watch by poking his anoos with injections.

All characters in this moviefilm have retardation and woman have permit to speak specially when she not being run over by transportations or get face blown by gas from anoos or when she make sexytime with Kumars or clean his feets.  At all time, all woman have been instructed by directors to show teets. It is very nice but after while, boring.

Bebo talk so much that Kumars not want to do sexytime even when she has make payment for hotel room which is twice the size of capital of Kazhakhstan, bigger than capital of assholes Uzbekistan.

American pornographys star Denise Richard who look like she want to make a shit says she want to make golden babies with Kumars because he is like hot chocolate face. Since he now a retard, Kumars make decide to marry old porno star Richard but Bebo realise she want to be in his cage first.

I forget… the moviefilm has Superman Brandon Rouths for five seconds in character name Loser and Rambo Balboas. My friend Sudermans say Rambo look like Indian bodybuilder Sunny Deol with plastic surgery and act like him too. When one chocolate face tells worldfamous Rambo: You picked the wrong neighbourhood pal, everyone in moviehall laugh ha ha ha ha ha ha… He make a joke.

I finish my reportings. Great success.

Chenquieh!

New York: Terrorism – Yash Raj style

July 3, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

“Just how would you capture the 9/11 moment when the second plane crashes into the World Trade Centre?

In Kabir Khan’s New York, American extras stare at the TV like they are watching America lose to Brasil in the FIFA world cup. Just a tad disappointed, not shocked or outraged as they stand rooted to the ground lazily and of all people, poor Katrina is entrusted with shouldering the responsibility of showcasing the shock and horror of that moment. Come on now, really?”

Read the full review here.

The Hangover: Hang out with the boys

June 26, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Comedy
Director: Todd Philips
Cast: Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis, Heather Graham
Storyline: Three friends get wasted in Vegas and it’s Dude, Where’s My Car all over again. Here, they have also lost their best friend who’s getting married the next day.
Bottomline: The funniest film this year. Period.

Over the last few years, Hollywood has tasted quite a bit of success with this genre though it never perfected it. Until now.

Drunken revelry, Freudian irreverence, celebration of bachelorhood and the dream wishlist: Everything a guy ever wanted to do but never got to a chance to.

The Hangover is as perfect as it gets as far as Boys Night Out entertainment goes. Like chick flicks, the antithetic genre of Dick flicks plays out like every Tom, Dick and Harry’s fantasy.

So, what you have in The Hangover is loads of male bonding, politically incorrect jokes, situations and characters, sloshed and creating havoc in Vegas during one hell of a wild night they will never forget. Or remember.

When we say wild, we literally mean wild life – from tigers to strippers in their room to a barely year-old baby who becomes the youngest male ever seen onscreen doing something you’ve seen only in porno movies.

Though it seems to derive this inanely bizarre from the whacko Dude, Where’s My Car, this one seems funnier because unlike the Ashton Kutcher film that went all out as a science fiction spoof, The Hangover, is quite grounded with a reality… at least reality that can be aspired for.

You can steal Mike Tyson’s tiger, trash a five-star hotel, make a killing at the casinos, marry a stripper or jack a cop car you know… it’s not still as unrealistically fantasy-like as Dude, Where’s My Car where hot babe aliens are willing to give you erotic pleasure if you can hand them the “continuum transfunctioner.”

Still, why did ‘Dude, Where’s My Car’ get only a five on ten rating while this averages over 8.4 on ten around the world with both critics and audiences loving it despite it smacking of political incorrectness of every kind?

That’s probably because The Hangover goes deeper into the male psyche and Dude, Where’s my car was superficially flakey. Here, the tapes of what they do when they are totally wasted actually can be sent to their shrinks who can spend hours psycho-analysing the boys and be further deconstructed to understand fears, insecurities, dreams and aspirations of the Average Joe. Or Dick.

But the beauty of The Hangover is that director Todd Philips decides to pretend that of all that is purely incidental.

The focus of this film is on three drunk guys trying to piece together all that they did during a night they cannot remember and hence, the screenplay too has plenty of licence to run riot between the blanks.

We never get to see what they did, only the aftermath and a few fragments (now, stay till the very end if you want every thread tied up)

The actors are a prize catch and you can’t wait for the boys to return. (Yes, they will return for a sequel next year)

Ed Helms (Andy from The Office), finally you get a role you can sink your teeth into.

Bradley Cooper, welcome to the Men’s club – here, you get to atone for your sins during the time you spent doing silly chick flicks (he was last seen grabbing Scarlett Johansson in He’s Just Not That Into You).

Zach Galifianakis – you are a Dude, man. Pour me a drink, will you.

And Heather Graham, this film’s just one of those reasons the boys will always love you and cherish you for – the other two films being Austin Powers and Bowfinger. Keep doing that thing you do.

And the rest of you boys reading this, what the hell are you waiting for? Go hang with them now.

Paying Guests: Desi dick flick (Uncut)

June 26, 2009 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Comedy
Director: Paritosh Painter
Cast: Javed Jaffrey, Shreyas Talpade, Aashish Chaudhary, Vatsal Seth, Celina Jaitley, Riya Sen, Sayali Bhagat, Neha Dhupia, Asrani, Johnny Lever
Storyline: Out of work buddies pretend to be married couples for a roof over their heads
Bottomline: Front bencher’s delight.

If you’re a girl, you will sound like a bird by the end of the film, going “Cheap,” “Cheap,” “Cheap” every few moments. The film’s so “Cheap” that most boys wouldn’t find a better bargain in the movie halls this season (at least till The Hangover releases).

Right from the posters (Javed Jaffrey is seen pinching bottoms), you know what to expect. It’s unabashedly male in its approach, thoroughly sexist and completely sexed up, Paying Guests is the definitive anti-thesis to the chick flick genre – what Hollywood and American film studies today refer to as the dick flick – popularised by Judd Apatow, Mike Myers, Kevin Smith, Sacha Baron Cohen and the likes.

By no means can Paying Guests be called good cinema. But it’s great entertainment nonetheless, a gloriously cheap celebration of political incorrectness.

Paritosh Painter adapts his play to the big screen with all the clichés you can find in silly Bollywood comedies over the decades.

Out of work guys who can’t pay rent. Check.

Men in drag, equipped with Tennis balls. Check.

Clown with a lisp. Check.

Character who unwittingly uses wrong English words (like Welding instead of

Wedding, Infection instead of Introduction). Check.

Speaking Hindi in a Tamil accent. Check.

Slip-and-fall routines. Check.

Walking-into-a-glass-door comedy. Check.

Walking-into-a-pole humour. Check.

Bitching-only-to-find-the-person-behind-their-back laughs. Check.

Caught-without-pants gags. Check.
Also, everyone speaks as if Hindi is the new national language of Thailand and there’s a full-blown “Dude Where’s My Car” rip-off. Remember the two guys with tattoos on their back that say “Dude” and “Sweet” respectively sparking off an endless loopy scene with the duo quizzing each other on what the other one’s tattoo says?
Here, the trio live in a house called Kisska House and someone ultimately has to come and ask the tenants who owns the house. If you can laugh at that joke, you will survive till the end.
However stale the jokes are, they work and only because of the fantastic actors that Shreyas Talpade, Javed Jaffrey and Aashish Chaudhary are. Their comic timing is impeccable, whether it is physical comedy, the bad puns or the casual quips and the gang makes these series of gags you’ve seen before immensely watchable.
Liked Apna Sapna Money Money?
Well, this one unfolds like a fanboy tribute to that film as Javed Jaffrey’s ringtone goes “Dekha Jo Tujhe Yaar Dil Main Baji Guitar” and later, Ritiesh Deshmukh in drag on TV gives one of them the brainwave – to make their friends dress in drag since the landlord would rent out portions only to married couples.
Soon, Shreyas and Javed become Karisma and Kareena.  Try as hard as you may not to be amused, you will fail.
The guys are a blast and the girls have nothing else to do apart from prancing around wearing the shortest clothes ever made and going over the top. Come on, when you know a film that casts both Riya Sen and Celina Jaitley… and Neha Dhupia for a bonus, you ought to know what’s in store. Miss Sayali Bhagat, please don’t ever try to act. You’re scaring the kids away.
When Riya Sen sporting the skimpiest top she can find, sobs and asks for a hanky, you wonder if she’s asking for a change of clothes. It’s that kind of a movie.
The climax itself is a decent reprisal of Kundan Shah’s Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron and as corny and cheesy as it gets, you will find it impossible to stifle a grin. The film’s peppered with comic talents – Paintal, Johnny Lever, Chunky Pandey, Delnaaz Paul and the volume of laughs make up for the quality.
So it’s easier to simply surrender to this madness and have a good time with the boys. Go sloshed for better results.
Page 18 of 88 « Previous 1 … 16 17 18 19 20 … 88 Next »
  • Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...