• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
  • Good Night | Good Morning

  • Word thru the bird

    Tweets by SudhishKamath
  • Connect with GNGM

    Connect with GNGM
  • About GNGM

    Reviews

    “A cerebral joyride”
    Karan Johar, filmmaker on REDIFF

    “Among the most charming and creative Indian independent films”
    J Hurtado, TWITCH

    ★★★★✩
    “You don’t really need a big star cast… you don’t even need a big budget to get the techniques of filmmaking bang on…”
    Allen O Brien, TIMES OF INDIA

    ★★★★✩
    “An outstanding experience that doesn’t come by too often out of Indian cinema!”
    Shakti Salgaokar, DNA

    ★★★
    “This film can reach out the young, urban, upwardly mobile, but lonely, disconnected souls living anywhere in the world, not just India.”
    Namrata Joshi, OUTLOOK

    “I was blown away!”
    Aseem Chhabra, MUMBAI MIRROR

    “Good Night Good Morning is brilliant!”
    Rohit Vats, IBN-LIVE

    ★★★✩✩
    “Watch it because it’s a smart film.”
    Shubha Shetty Saha, MIDDAY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A small gem of a movie.”
    Sonia Chopra, SIFY

    ★★★✩✩
    “A charming flirtation to watch.”
    Shalini Langer, INDIAN EXPRESS

    “Interesting, intelligent & innovative”
    Pragya Tiwari, TEHELKA

    “Beyond good. Original, engrossing and entertaining”
    Roshni Mulchandani, BOLLYSPICE

    * * * * *
    Synopsis

    ‘Good Night Good Morning’ is a black and white, split-screen, conversation film about two strangers sharing an all-night phone call on New Year's night.

    Writer-Director Sudhish Kamath attempts to discover good old-fashioned romance in a technology-driven mobile world as the boy Turiya, driving from New York to Philadelphia with buddies, calls the enigmatic girl staying alone in her hotel room, after a brief encounter at the bar earlier in the night.

    The boy has his baggage of an eight-year-old failed relationship and the girl has her own demons to fight. Scarred by unpleasant memories, she prefers to travel on New Year's Eve.

    Anonymity could be comforting and such a situation could lead to an almost romance as two strangers go through the eight stages of a relationship – The Icebreaker, The Honeymoon, The Reality Check, The Break-up, The Patch-up, The Confiding, The Great Friendship, The Killing Confusion - all over one phone conversation.

    As they get closer to each other over the phone, they find themselves miles apart geographically when the film ends and it is time for her to board her flight. Will they just let it be a night they would cherish for the rest of their lives or do they want more?

    Good Night | Good Morning, starring Manu Narayan (Bombay Dreams, The Love Guru, Quarter Life Crisis) and Seema Rahmani (Loins of Punjab, Sins and Missed Call) also features New York based theatre actor Vasanth Santosham (Bhopal: A Prayer for Rain), screenwriter and film critic Raja Sen and adman Abhishek D Shah.

    Shot in black and white as a tribute to the era of talkies of the fifties, the film set to a jazzy score by musicians from UK (Jazz composer Ray Guntrip and singer Tina May collaborated for the song ‘Out of the Blue), the US (Manu Narayan and his creative partner Radovan scored two songs for the film – All That’s Beautiful Must Die and Fire while Gregory Generet provided his versions of two popular jazz standards – Once You’ve Been In Love and Moon Dance) and India (Sudeep and Jerry came up with a new live version of Strangers in the Night) was met with rave reviews from leading film critics.

    The film was released under the PVR Director’s Rare banner on January 20, 2012.

    Festivals & Screenings

    Mumbai Film Festival (MAMI), Mumbai 2010 World Premiere
    South Asian Intl Film Festival, New York, 2010 Intl Premiere
    Goa Film Alliance-IFFI, Goa, 2010 Spl Screening
    Chennai Intl Film Festival, Chennai, 2010 Official Selection
    Habitat Film Festival, New Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Transilvania Intl Film Festival, Cluj, 2011 Official Selection, 3.97/5 Audience Barometer
    International Film Festival, Delhi, 2011 Official Selection
    Noordelijk Film Festival, Netherlands, 2011 Official Selection, 7.11/10 Audience Barometer
    Mumbai Film Mart, Mumbai 2011, Market Screening
    Film Bazaar, IFFI-Goa, 2011, Market Screening
    Saarang Film Festival, IIT-Madras, 2012, Official Selection, 7.7/10 Audience Barometer

    Theatrical Release, January 20, 2012 through PVR

    Mumbai
    Delhi
    Gurgaon
    Ahmedabad
    Bangalore
    Chennai
    Hyderabad (January 27)

    * * * * *

    More information: IMDB | Facebook | Youtube | Wikipedia | Website

  • Browse: Categories

  • November 2025
    M T W T F S S
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    « Dec    
  • Recent Posts

    • Simmba: A departure from the formula
    • Zero: The hero who wasn’t
    • Protected: AndhaDhun: What did that end mean?
    • Love and other cliches
    • October: Where is Dan?

Browsing Category Archives

Website under construction.

Gautami: Beyond labels, Defying definitions

July 15, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

When you go in to watch the most awaited film of the year made by people you admire, you’re not just excited but also scared that you may not like it.

Just as I was about to leave to watch the film a night before the official release at Rohini complex, I caught Gautami on chat.

“You nervous,” I asked.

“Not at all,” she typed back.

I was.

More so, after she said: “Let me know what you think.”

I saw the film twice in the next four days.

When I meet Gautami later in the week at her office, we begin with the response generated.

Is dumbing down an idea for the mass a necessary evil of commercial cinema?
That’s when I realise Gautami does not like definitions.

“What’s a ‘class’ audience? Just because they pay a higher value for a ticket does not mean they have a higher level of awareness or critiquing or aesthetics of cinema. I know factory workers from Tambaram who would pay 2000 bucks to watch a film. People from the so-called class audience tell me they would have to see it a few times to understand it completely,” she says.

“I think the beauty of this film is that it has reached different people at different levels. Everybody finds something different to say.”

Does hype affect how people see a film?

“That’s a huge part of the thrill of going to see a movie, not knowing what to expect. I like to go in with an open mind. I don’t like to read the reviews beforehand, I don’t like to read the story or the book or find out from my neighbour how it was. Even while watching it, I don’t want to try to guess what the climax is going to be and then bore myself silly. I think that defeats the purpose of entertainment. I would like the storyteller or the filmmaker to tell me the story in their own way. I like to form my opinion AFTER I’ve seen the whole film, what worked for me and what didn’t.”

Gautami has seen the film grow in front of her eyes from the idea to concept to screenplay to film and with it, she grew as a technician. “It has been an eye opener. We all don’t have to go out and make films. We can do anything. But it’s about how much better can we do it. It’s about your endeavour for something above the ordinary and beyond the benchmarks you’ve set for yourself.”

She seemed to enjoy her second innings.

In her first innings, Gautami was the hottest heroine on the block doing films with Rajnikant and Kamal Hassan. She giggles when you tell her that.

What happened between these two innings?
“Life happened. I got married, I figured out how relationships work. I had a daughter, lost my parents, one after the other. Figured out and understood that a relationship has to be participated with mutual respect and equal effort from both parties and if not, it’s not something I would like to spend my life on. So I went about shaping my life with something I am happy with and with people I am comfortable with. Then I fought cancer and I came out of that and did Dasavatharam.”

No one else could’ve mentioned all of that and made it sound like it happens to everybody. Especially, fighting cancer and rebooting after life-altering changes. When exactly did the Ulaga Nayakan make an entry into her life?

“Halfway through all that,” she says. “I had decided that I did not want a life with any kind of compromise. We live one life. If you are lucky, you live to eighty, you have all your faculties in tact and you have life, that’s great. But if you don’t and if you just have today, how well do you live life? How honestly do you live it for yourself? I made all my decisions on my personal life, my marriage, based on that. My daughter needs to grow in an environment that is loving, wholesome, where there is no stress, where there is no kind of pressure of any kind…”

How did she fall in love with Kamal Hassan?
“He was Kamal Sir to me. He still is, but in a different way. He was one person I looked up to and thought the world of. With every level that I’ve gotten to know him, from the audience to star to his co-star to… I’ve seen him as a writer, I’ve seen him as a director, I’ve seen him on the set, I’ve seen him with his kids and my respect for him has only grown.  He’s an immensely strong person, very, very compassionate. These are things which are never seen or heard because he never speaks of himself and people who know him don’t speak much. It is about sharing little joys, every moment, every day, it’s about the 24 hours… I think both of us felt that and it grew to the next stage.”

Is it a relationship that’s beyond marriage?
“No, I’m not going to classify my relationship. I don’t feel the need to define it.”

Classic Gautami. She does not believe in definitions.

* * *

On Kamal Hassan

I have learnt perseverance from him. I have seen him go through all kinds of issues. Everything is kept where it should be. He’s never ever come home with work tension. He’ll come back home, the kids will be all over him, the dogs will be over him and he’ll be playing with them. He would’ve probably left behind something of great magnitude back at office… I know a lot of people who would bring that tension home. Not him. He knows to compartmentalise.

I don’t think it is cinema that’s the glue that holds us together. It’s about two individuals at a fundamental level and the kind of people we are. If you ask me, a couple should never work together.

Also, I am very mindful of his taste. I have never ever thought of telling him what he should be doing… he’s the master craftsman. I think that’s root of this admiration.

When there’s a field you love so much, and there’s this master craftsman and you realise who he is and where his dreams are coming from, the magnitude of his talent, it’s a different kind of an admiration.

While we were putting Dasavatharam together, we were focusing on the smaller parts and our individual contributions. So we never knew how the big picture would look when put together.

The perfectionist that he is, he is his biggest critic. So when it was finally ready, as he was watching it and being critical of himself about the small details, I was in complete awe of one man’s vision to dream and put it out there. He’s done something without the benefit of a precedent, something that will give people years later the encouragement and insight on how it could be done. He dared to do it and we should be proud of him.

Hancock: Where there’s a Will…

July 12, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Action/Comedy
Director: Peter Berg
Cast: Will Smith, Charlize Theron, Jason Bateman
Storyline: An anti-social superhero gets an image makeover but his past is back to haunt him yet again
Bottomline: The funniest superhero movie of all times

There are superhero movies. There are superhero spoofs. And, there’s Hancock.

Seriously, Will Smith’s got to be the funniest thing on film to have ever saved the world. When was the last time you actually had an entire hall cheering and rooting whole-heartedly for a superhero/superstar not from this land?

Hancock isn’t your regular superhero. He’s jaded, bloody irresponsible, engages in drunken flying, dirty and foul-mouthed, politically incorrect (he’s mean to senior citizens, rude to children) and unwittingly wrecks the town reckless. No wonder then that he’s doing a thankless job. People hate him.

That makes John Hancock the single most irreverent superhero of our times and one of the most adorable onscreen rogues ever. A modern day Devdas, even.

The original Bad Boy would’ve been so much cooler if only he got to mouth a few more of those seven words you can’t say on television. Yes, that would’ve been a black stereotype indeed but hey, what about all those bits where he thrusts one guy’s head into another chap’s crack? The hall was in splits.

The film is a celebration of black-American humour and a little profanity would’ve done no harm, brothers. It’s juvenile fun, yeah, but not the kind of film you bring your kids to.

Though Hancock is the embodiment of the collective angst of superheroes who have a jinxed love life given their responsibilities of saving the world, Peter Berg makes sure that that inherent pathos and resulting drama, rarely takes over the light-hearted mood of a film celebrating the staple of comic books.

Employing hand-held cinematography for realism, Berg would have us believe that these guys from the comic books sporting crotchety tight capes have no clue what being a real superhero feels like. Making fun of every bit of superhero mythology, ranging from origin to costume to food habits to how they got their superhero name, the makers have done quite well to root Hancock in the real world – Hancock hates the idea of body-hugging costume, is from this planet (Miami as far as he can remember), loves his meat-balls in spaghetti like every other American family, longs for love and actually cares about what people think of him and his name was just a case of misunderstanding.

The explanation of his superhero roots is rather simple yet fascinating. What if the world’s most powerful superhero could also be the most vulnerable? Hancock is a sobering take on the life of an unlikely superhero and an attempt to capture the slices of larger-than-life through relatable paradigms. The documentary footage of the superhero on Youtube, for instance.

The climax, however, is an entirely different film ghost-directed by Karan Johar. A stretch of schmaltz.

Charlize Theron tries to steal the film from Will Smith in the second half looking hot as hell and the likeable Jason Bateman sets up the laughs throughout but it is Will who OWNS the film.

Let’s drink to a sequel and hope Hancock turns anti-social again. After all, this superhero is more fun when drunk.

Wanted: The Gun Fight-Club

July 11, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Action
Director: Timur Bekmambetov
Cast: James McAvoy, Angelina Jolie, Morgan Freeman
Storyline: An ordinary man is sucked into a world of violence when he learns that his father was an assassin belonging to a cult called The Fraternity
Bottomline: Will blow the smithereens out of your mind

Violence has never looked so delicious. Nor has a messiah of destruction ever looked so incredibly edible. Get ready to be consumed by lust. And a zest for life. Taking life, to be specific.

Angelina’s Fox is just a heavenly embodiment of the seduction you are in for as you sit and watch this film, barely able to take your eyes off the screen for even a moment. You don’t want to blink and miss any bit of the action. Speaking of which there’s a seriously hot moment when Fox emerges out a bath, with only tattoos to adorn her dripping wet bare back.

Director Timur Bekmambetov treats the graphic novel by Mark Miller and J.G. Jones as his bible and transforms gun-fights into an art-form, creating a stylised symphony of violence that is so stylish that it would give Superstar a complex.

The plot is just a petty excuse for pretty much every one in the film to shoot every body else and bite the bullet. But not before learning to ‘bend’ it like Beckham! Yes, bullets in this film rarely travel in a straight path, the film makes you believe that if you train hard enough, you can press the trigger and be assured that the bullet can actually ‘curve’ around any obstacle before meeting its target.

Bullets kiss each other, they bump into the other, they graze and face-off, pretty much like arrows did when you grew up watching Ramayan. Yet, when you see it happening in ‘Wanted,’ it’s poetry in motion.

Wanted is not even a wee bit deep as Fight Club was but from what meets the eye, it’s as bloody good as it gets in an action film. Clearly, the visual effects guys have had a blast making some of the most wicked stunts look so spectacularly cool. This is an over the top, shameless exhibition of attitude, political incorrectness and violence as a cathartic experience.

James McAvoy looks a lot like Russell Crowe looked years ago before he turned beefy and provides the right blend of vulnerability and toughness to Wesley Gibson. Morgan Freeman has little to do and doesn’t seem comfortable with profanity.

But then, this is largely an Angelina showcase. She sends temperatures soaring, scorching the screen with her presence and there you are, drooling, sweating and completely dehydrated by the end of it all.

Wanted: A glass of water, please.

Kung Fu Panda: Enjoy the Panda-monium

July 11, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Animation/Comedy
Director: Mark Osborne, John Stevenson
Cast: Jack Black, Dustin Hoffman, Angelina Jolie, Jackie Chan, Lucy Liu, Seth Rogen
Storyline: Chosen to fight the evil Tai Lung, a flabby panda called Po must train under a reluctant master Shifu.
Bottomline: Go, Panda. Po, kick some ass!

Martial arts fans are going to love this. So will children. And, adults.

This cheeky tribute to the ‘Please teach me kung fu, master’ genre films will make you laugh out loud and like most animation films for kids, also teaches young ones a thing or two about belief, confidence and chasing their dreams.

Morals aside, Kung Fu Panda works at various levels. It not only combines celebratory tribute (say, like ‘Kill Bill’) with spoof like ‘Kung Fu Hustle,’ sometimes goes all out to poke fun at the genre like ‘Kung Pow’ and at times, is dead serious about sticking to the martial arts formula like ‘The Forbidden Kingdom.’

Like in all martial arts movies, a Chosen One has to train under a reluctant master to defeat the super-skilled villain who has betrayed the master.

Sounds cheesy but only until you find out who’s playing these roles. First, there’s good fat Po, the panda (voice by Jack Black) who spends his time dreaming about becoming a martial arts hero some day (a nicely done anime-inspired 2D sequence gets us straight into the movie) and join the league of his idols – the Furious Five played by a tigress (Angelina Jolie), a monkey (Jackie Chan), a viper (Lucy Liu), a mantis (Seth Rogen) and a crane (David Cross).

To top it all, there’s Dustin Hoffman lending his voice to the adorable Shifu (the diminutive raccoon-like red panda), the master of the Furious Five, who has to train the lazy, flabby, gluttonous panda simply because Oogway (a tortoise and the leader of animals) has chosen Po to be the Dragon Warrior and fight the notorious snow leopard Tai Lung.

You can’t help but fall in love with these charming little creatures that come with incredibly funny lines. Like the bit when Po rescues the damsels in distress with his kung fu moves and the pretty one asks him ‘How can we ever repay you,’ Po quips: “There is no charge for awesomeness. Or attractiveness.” How can you not go ‘Awwww’?

After a point, you forget all about the medium, it’s all about these lovable characters. Thank God for quality 3D animation.

How else would we get to see animals do all that they do in the films and NOT feel like eating them?

Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na: The Next Gen Khan arrives

July 11, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Romance
Director: Abbas Tyrewala
Cast: Imran Khan, Genelia D’Souza, Naseeruddin Shah, Ratna Pathak Shah
Storyline: Best friends Jai and Aditi don’t know they love each other. Until…
Bottomline: Fall in love with the magic of movies

Every generation cherishes a coming-of-age film they grew up watching.

Two decades ago, Aamir entered the Bollywood Khan-daan with one of the most definitive films of that generation. Remember how Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak captured the angst of the young in love, that time when the boys took what Papa Kehte Hai quite seriously? Or how a few years later, another generation of youth got into slacker/rebel mode and struggled to express their love for family, temporarily suspended in the Pehla Nasha of romance (lust at first sight and later falling for the best friend next door) with Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikander or Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa?

A few years later, a new generation then discovered a few things about love and friendship on their own with nothing to prove to the parents, celebrating life with Dil Chahta Hai.

The new generation has ‘Jaane Tu… Ya Jaane Na,’ a film that will live on for years as another Khan born to rule arrives in style.

Despite its inspired origins (a structure borrowed from Forget Paris, Celeste and Estrela and also employed earlier in Chalte Chalte) and derived from the Hollywood school of romantic comedies, Jaane Tu is one of those movies that instantly connects to the youth simply because of the world it is set in and the characters who inhabit it.

This world where Pappu can’t dance is about a bunch of friends who are as ordinary as they get in the real world, leading perfectly normal lives with friends who sing out of tune… a world where a boy and girl can be the best of friends and yet had somehow never really given a serious thought to going out with each other. A world where it’s no big deal for people dealing with unrequited love to settle for love where it is available. A world where people are never sure of their feelings. And also, a world where compatibility is the necessity for romance.

Jai and Aditi are exact opposites, he’s a Rajput lion who’s been bred as sheep and she’s a wild cat waiting for a fight. They are great friends. To quote from a song he sings to cheer her up: Rotey Hai Hum Bhi Agar Tere Aankhon Main Aasoon Aatey Hai (I cry if there are tears in your eyes). Yet, he has no clue that he loves her.

The rest of the story can be completed by any amateur wannabe rom-com writer but what’s interesting about Abbas Tyrewala’s storytelling is how relatable he makes this simple story by exploiting the age-old unwritten law of machismo buried in our films.

For the uninitiated, Hindi film tradition demands that a boy needs to fulfill three basic requirements to become a man… Or a Bollywood hero. He has to beat up people, he has to have some royal blood in him and he should break the law. Also, Hollywood tradition of romantic comedies requires a chase to the airport in the end. Nothing else can make it larger than life. Nothing else can make life look like a movie.

So Tyrewala gives us exactly this, but in his own style and terms, employing some delightful larger-than-life cameos (clearly the funniest parts of the film) and extremely believable support characters, whether it is the circle of friends or the family… Rathna Pathak Shah has to be one of the best onscreen Moms in recent times.

The ensemble is an example of flawless casting. Prateik Babbar’s cameo as Genelia’s reclusive, introverted artist brother, for instance. The detail, sub-plots and back stories to every support character is exemplary.

What makes us like Imran Khan instantly is that right from the start, he’s just the quiet boy next door who never tries to impress (no fancy bikes or complicated dance steps other star-sons use to launch themselves), always doing exactly what the character demands him to do. Watch the scene where he first feels hurt seeing his best friend with another guy and the young man lets his eyes say it all. He makes his Uncle proud and is clearly here to stay. Genelia’s Aditi is easily excitable and hence, those who hate her may still hate her and those who love her would love her more.

Right from the jazzy opening credits, A.R. Rahman seems to have a blast with a fitting genre tribute to Harry Connick Jr’s ‘Let’s Call The Whole Thing Off’ (from the When Harry Met Sarry OST) with ‘Tu Bole’… The album is a must-buy.

Yes, it may not be a wholly original film, it may force you to suspend your disbelief quite unabashedly, it may have characters sing your favourite song out of tune endlessly just to remind you it’s the title of the film but sometimes, films transcend all these inherent flaws with magic that only cinema can produce. And those magical moments… make you forget everything else.

Love Story 2050: When Harry Puttar met Darth Vader

July 8, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Fantasy
Director: Harry Baweja
Cast: Harman Baweja, Priyanka Chopra, Boman Irani, Darth Vader, the Dasavatharam Butterfly
Storyline: A Hrithik Roshan look-alike has to use his uncle’s time machine to go into the future and bring his reincarnated lover back to the present.
Bottomline: If this is what love/story/2050 looks like, kill me now… I want to be reincarnated.

Of course, an epic love story of this magnitude cannot be condensed in to 200-paltry-odd minutes. Here are some of the deleted scenes:

a. Two hundred years later when he goes back to the future again because Priyanka has been hit by a bout of lightning for bad acting (when the usual trucks fail, God has to try harder) Harman finally meets the mysterious bald man… Darth Vader removes the mask and announces: “Look, I am your father.” It’s Rakesh Roshan himself. A light-saber fight between Harry Baweja and Rakesh Roshan will be held in public view to promote the sequel Love Saga 2250 ahead of its release.

b. Priyanka Chopra as Zeisha comes back to 2008 and on the suhaag raat, Harman finds out: It’s a boy! Like all the other surprises he had faced in 2050, Harman realises that this too doesn’t change the fact that he still loves Zeisha. God shakes his head (a Rishi Kapoor-look-alike maybe) in a final bid to end the film, sends down that bolt of lightning blissfully unaware that He was going to pave the way for the sequel.

c. The folks at South Australian Tourism board originally wanted more shots of the Aussie hospitality. When Harman knocks down a packet of chips and is chased by a bunch of vengeful guys, remember one of them was wearing T-shirt that said ‘Angry’? A sub-plot involving his pal wearing a T-shirt that says: ‘I cannot climb walls’ was deleted for pace and also to suggest that the hero here was smarter than the average Australian because he could climb and escape. To showcase Aussie hospitality further, Harry retained the scene where Harman dares Priyanka to shoplift and she does so successfully. Another scene effectively highlights the hi-tech butterfly-aided Aussie transport system that shows stalkers stranded on the railway platform which exact station their victim would disembark.

d. There’s a Hrithik Roshan look-alike contest in Sydney where the real Hrithik Roshan decides to show-up for a crowd-pleasing cameo. He loses to Harman because the Harry’s Puttar is more Hrithik than Hrithik himself. After all, he has five perfectly normal fingers to show and at no point does Harman let his I’m-a-seriously-sincere-actor-forever-conscious-of-the-camera guard down. And, these critics say Harman is bad. He’s not a bad actor at all, just an obsessed petty thief… By the way, Hrithik still wants the clothes and accessories from his wardrobe back.

e. The visual effects department has come up with an Academy-award-worthy job. They’ve not only made Harman look like Hrithik, they’ve also created equally gay robots QT (E.T’s distant lesbian cousin) and teddy bear Boo (a sexually confused teddy that finds itself attracted to QT and often does things that make Priyanka spank her or something like that). The endorsement of same-sex attraction is the kind of stuff children’s films of the future are made up of. There’s also a close-up shot of Harman’s delightfully gay admirer during the ‘It’s Magic, It’s Magic’ song. Because of copyright hassles, this song had to be reshot and further de-composed.

f. The dialogue ‘I don’t need luck, I have love’ was deleted after the tenth time. It originally appeared 2040 more times but Harry decided it would be too much of a good thing and has saved it for the sequels. The scripting team has received a bonus after 2050’s cool lingo… ‘Eat Ice,’ ‘You need an upgrade,’ ‘Stop your verbal schabang’ and ‘Snip it’ caught on right from the first show. With critics heaping lavish praise on the ‘Your life is a hot dog without the sausage’ line, more gems like “A hungry mouth needs a banana” and “When you are not engaged and getting any, put your phone on vibrate” have been saved for the sequel.

Because of further space constraints, the rest will be made available on a 2050-disc special edition. This fascinating, charming little film is exactly the kind you should feed your friends to. What are friends for, if not to share such joy.. When time stood still for a film on time travel.

Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic: Kya Aap Panchvi-Fail Hai?

July 5, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Fantasy
Director: Kunal Kohli
Cast: Saif Ali Khan, Rani Mukerji, Ameesha
Storyline: A man who kills a couple in a car accident has to take care of their kids as God sends an angel to help them reconcile.
Bottomline: Four psycho kids, a fat angel/aunty, God with a goatie and a Mac-loving businessman who seems put off by his super hot girlfriend’s underwater swimming abilities and some visual effects.

What could possibly be worse than being told right at the beginning through Lata Mangeshkar’s vocal cue that you are about to watch a Yash Raj Film? Having Shaan’s borderline-Kumar Sanu-like nasal hum from ‘Fanaa’ remind you that this is also a Kunal Kohli film.

Which means you will not only be subjected to a world of candy floss set to tune with the recurring motif of a song cue, but you will also have to endure kids trying to act cute along the way. Four of them psycho-brats, in this case. No exaggeration.

Thoda Pyaar Thoda Magic will make you clench your butt muscles.

If your kid is all set to take a shot at the ball kept on the mouth of a child forcibly pinned down, with a golf club, you know he has a problem that requires medical attention.

Unfortunately, Thoda Pyaar is not about mental health though all characters seem to need a little help in that department.

First, a never-smiling bitter killer businessman (Saif) who alternates his free time between astronomy and heavenly bodies such as Ameesha (in the role of her career, asked to do only what she is capable of – act cheerfully dumb and wear a swimsuit that plays peek-a-boo with you).

Then, we learn these four compulsively destructive kids are also into organised crime (they buy walkie talkies to sabotage Saif’s potty-routine and occupy all four bathrooms during the rush hour).

Until tech-savvy God decides to dispatch the fattest of his fairies (Rani Mukerji) to help these mentally unstable people find their peace but only after she finishes her ‘Sound of Music’ How-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-Maria routine.

But this fairy seems to have problems of her own. She cannot cry because she’s borrowed from the ‘City of Angels’. Like ‘Mary Poppins,’ she goes down the rainbow on a cycle to meet her ‘Sound of Music’ charges and takes them out for a ‘Night at the Museum.’

Kunal Kohli, who ripped off all the best bits from Before Sunrise, Before Sunset and When Harry Met Sally to piece together his best work till date, Hum Tum, says it like a matter of right when he employs visual effects to morph the Hollywood sign from Hollywood Hills, LA, California, replacing the H with a B.

Now that’s not just emblematic, it is definitive of his work. Take an English DVD, scratch out the Hollywood elements and replace them with the B-movie elements.

Seriously, it’s time to shove the Tribute word up the place where it’s coming from and actually contribute, Mr. Kohli. Otherwise, you are just a repeat offender like Sanjay Gupta.

Surprisingly for a Yash Raj-Kunal Kohli film, the young actors aren’t too bad. Rachit Sidana (the Sikh kid) is a natural, Shriya Sharma is a little over-enthusiastic but likeable as always, Ayushi Berman, the quiet sweet one, has little to do but Akshat Chopra (playing Vashisht, the leader of the pack) who seems like a decent actor, is a victim of half-baked characterisation.

Poor Saif seems cluelessly lost and Mac fans would understand his rage when one of those brats does unmentionable things to the desktop. Rani ought to consider VLCC.

Overall, though derived and inspired from a bunch of Hollywood films, ‘Thoda Pyaar’ is passable fare, especially if you haven’t passed out of Paanchvi yet. Kids being the innocent, unsuspecting customers they are, may not find much to complain.

Though the parents might when Ameesha starts cavorting around in a dripping wet bikini during Lazy Lamhe, the singularly riveting portion of the film. The rest of the film is a lot of work for those butt muscles. Clench them hard, grin and bear – like Saif does it – to survive this film.

The Incredible Hulk: Cut and Cheated

July 4, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Action
Director: Louis Leterrier
Cast: Edward Norton, Liv Tyler, Tim Roth, William Hurt
Storyline: Nearly six months after the ‘incident,’ Bruce is traced to Brazil and the Hulk is wanted dead by the military.
Bottomline: Credible. Incredible. Marvel-ous. Except fraudulently edited by local distributors.

If you’re watching this film in Chennai or Tamil Nadu, you are likely to go green. Angry.

The conmen distributing The Incredible Hulk in this part of the world, Thennandal Films, have chopped down 20 per cent of the 114-minute PG-13 Marvel Studios film. The distributor’s cut is not just stupidly tasteless, it is so random and merciless about dialogue portions that whoever chopped this film down for the distributor needs a kick in the behind from The Hulk himself.

Anyone interested in taking the distributors to court have a willing witness here.

After all, you paid to watch the entire film that Louis Leterrier made for Marvel Studios, not to watch 25 minutes less. Also, Marvel did not make ‘Hulk Part 2,’ as this film is being falsely advertised.

Thenandal Films may not know this but Hulk fans are still quite angry about Ang Lee’s take on the superhero, so passing off a reboot to the franchise as a sequel is not just legally and factually wrong, it is also blasphemous.

We are not sure if the distributors are literate enough to understand because if they were, they wouldn’t brutally cut down a much-awaited superhero film to save Rs.10,000 per print. When you’ve paid 120 bucks, you deserve the full movie. Rental libraries give it for much lesser. The internet gives it for free.

All cinema halls screening the clipped down 90-minute version are party to fraud.

The Incredible Hulk emerges out of the shadows after a nice teasing little build-up with an elaborate long chase across the rooftops and bylanes of Brazil early on in the film, unlike the 2003 version where The Hulk made an appearance 45 minutes later.

Though it maybe unfair to review a film that has been so badly mutilated by the incompetent annachis, one thing we can say about the reboot is that the heart-pounding action sequences will make that destructively childish devil in you grin with glee.

With the intense Edward Norton as Bruce, the gorgeously sensuous Liv Tyler (Marvel seems to have a thing for drenching their superhero girlfriends in transparent clothing in rain) as Betty Ross, an ever reliable William Hurt (as Gen. Ross) and the adequately irritating Tim Roth (Blonsky), the casting seems quite interesting but without having seen 25-minutes of the talking portions of the film, it is difficult to compare it with the complexity that Ang Lee brought to the troubled comic book hero.

The spectacular visual effects in the climax where Hulk takes on Abomination ought to be seen on the big screen.

It won’t be too much fun on DVD. Which is why it is all the more important for the distributors to be honest and give us the whole film on the big screen.

21: Chemistry works better than math

June 29, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Thriller
Director: Robert Luketic
Cast: Jim Sturgess, Kate Bosworth, Kevin Spacey, Laurence Fishburne
Storyline: A bunch of kids from MIT are trained by their math professor to count cards (cheat systematically) and make millions in Vegas casinos.
Bottomline: Worth the gamble even if you don’t know the game

If you know how Blackjack is played, you are in to learn a few cool ways to cheat, applying a little mathematics.

Unlike the casino heists that Danny Ocean and Co would pull off, this one is more believable because Robert Luketic’s 21 is inspired from ‘Bringing down the house,’ the bestseller that documented real life stories of students who made millions employing math-based techniques.

Here, a phenomenally talented geeky good-looker Ben Campbell (Jim Sturgess) needs $3,00,000 to pay for his medical school fees at Harvard, especially since he only has a long shot at the scholarship reserved for the one student who can jump out of the page and dazzle the jury. Heading a team of nerds who are building a car that can drive by itself isn’t going to cut it. Nor is a promotion that pays eight dollars per hour.

Prof. Micky Rosa (Kevin Spacey) finds the young man to have the perfect temperament for cheating at Blackjack and makes him join the team that usually scores at the casinos at Vegas.

But what gets the movie really going, in the middle of all that inspired con, is the sexual tension and volatile chemistry between Jim Sturgess (Jude from Across The Universe) and the incredible attractive Kate Bosworth, who plays that girl every guy in college wants to date and one of the team-members.

21 hardly deviates from the regular campus movie formula. There are socially ill-equipped geeks and there is the circle of ‘cool,’ the hero of the story jumps camp and gets the girl, becomes so cool that he forgets his fat beer buddies until life reminds him all about friends, love and who he really is… Yet, to director Robert Luketic’s credit, it feels like a hardcore heist flick – the music, cinematography and editing constantly providing the tension and a sense of adventure.

With the veteran Kevin Spacey and the menacing Lawrence Fishburne around to intimidate them, you know the kids are only puppets and thankfully, the film at no point tries to make the pros look like fools. So even if you don’t understand how Blackjack is played, you still have a lot to character equations to keep you hooked.

In the end, though it is quite entertaining, you are left wondering what 21 could’ve been had this material been given to the guys who made Knocked Up or Superbad.

The Happening: And ‘Night’ falls

June 20, 2008 · by sudhishkamath

Genre: Thriller
Director: M. Night Shyamalan
Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Zooey Deschanel
Storyline: A mysterious air-borne toxin forces people to kill themselves
Bottomline: Happening. Not.

After Lady in the Water, M. Night Shyamalan probably had a nightmare.

He could see people walk out of the cinema halls halfway into his film and kill themselves because they couldn’t take it any more.

He woke up and wrote and wrote and wrote… Different ways how people could kill themselves… They could jump off the roof, shoot themselves, lie down in front of a lawn-mower, bang their heads into glass windows, cut off their veins if car-crashing doesn’t work…

He didn’t have a plot as such, so he looked back at his films – he’s shown the living dead, a superhuman born on earth, aliens from outer space, a village that lived in the past, nymphs and scrunts from water – and realised that logical progression demanded paranormal activity out of thin air.

So he finished his script in a line: A mysterious air-borne toxin (which will remain mysterious till the end of the film) is making people kill themselves all along the West Coast of America. Coming up next in the order could be a film about weirdos from the future.

Now, we already know that Shyamalan has the knack of stretching short story scripts to a feature-length thriller and we’ve never had a problem with that because he manages to weave in a conflict (both for the protagonist of the film and the larger community) and resolve it with a little bit of logical reasoning.

Here, you are let down from the story department because he sticks to the most convenient of horror film explanations – that some things are just an act of nature and cannot be explained. Zombie films offer better reasoning.

There is one genuinely funny scene in the film. Mark Wahlberg, wasted thoroughly in this let’s-run-away-from-air misadventure, after figuring out that plants and trees are causing the plague that causes people to kill themselves, decides to apologise because he heard they respond to human stimulus… only to realise he was barking up the wrong tree made of plastic.

There are some truly spooky shots of trees in the wind but that’s where the horror quotient ends.

Most shots of people killing themselves look straight out of like a laugh out loud spoof. And since this starts happening right from scene one, at no point do you take this film seriously. But then, as long as you are laughing and being entertained, who cares what’s happening.

Page 27 of 88 « Previous 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 88 Next »
  • Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...