• SUDA MING’S CHANNEL
  • TALKING FILMS
  • Good Night | Good Morning
  • My Talk Show
  • PROFILE

MADRAS INK.

Menu

  • Archives
  • Columns
  • Diary
  • Interviews
  • My Films
  • Reviews
Previous Next

Thanks to Peter ‘Psycho ‘Jackson, King Kong rocks!

December 14, 2005 · by sudhishkamath

After watching King Kong, I can almost imagine Peter Jackson, many years ago, playing back a DVD of King Kong and then going on a destructive spree. He probably was taken to see a shrink soon after as his folks pulled a rug over his dark side.

I imagine so because ‘King Kong’ is the work of a child deprived of mischief. The way Peter Jackson unleashes the entire cast (including extras) from Jurassic Park, many others from The Lord of the Rings, other assorted creepy crawlies on a munch-fest apart from the big ape himself wrecking havoc running around the streets of Manhattan, you can spot the childish destructive streak in him: not only is he highly imaginative and violent, he seems to totally relish the chance to remake a cult monster movie into the ultimate monster movie and execute his unfulfilled fantasies.

The scene where the hairy hero rips apart T-Rex’s mouth with his bare hands and later toys around with the broken jaw with much delight is ample testimony to the above observation.
Peter Jackson’s King Kong first makes an appearance 70 minutes into the movie.

Till then, the director spends time making you believe its a movie about a filmmaker out to make his movie against the biggest odds, with a never-say-die attitude, almost making him likeable (blame Jack Black for that), as Adrien Brody plays a SRKish charmer-screenwriter who falls for the blonde, a product of last minute casting after just about everything goes wrong with the filmmaker’s wild project.

Though it makes very little difference to the proceedings, the first 70 minutes seem to have been written to take King Kong beyond the monster movie genre and stake a claim for a modern day classic with romance of Titanic proportions. Also the first 70 minutes is the only time the movie is pretty light-hearted after which things are no longer that funny, what with people getting eaten up every two minutes.

It works for a patient audience but King Kong fans might just get a little restless waiting for him THAT long.

Naomi Watts fits in perfectly as the actress who has very little to do apart from look hawt, run around trees screaming hard as monsters try to eat her, entertain Kong with juggling and look mooney-eyed into the beauty-struck beast’s eyes. Adrien Brody is cast well too for a neat role that, however, waters down to almost nothing. Kong himself looks sooo much alive, thanks to Andy Serkins, the guy who also did all the acting for LOTR’s Gollum.

With special effects that are mind-blowing to say the least, the dialogues don’t look that bad though they seem to be borrowed from a handy make-your-own-monster movie guide: “What in the name of God is that?” “Holy Christ” “Run” and a million other screams. Maybe its a waste of time to write lines for people being eaten up or chased by gluttony monsters. For a movie kids will surely watch, it has way too many people being munched and treated with contempt. Especially, the way Kong throws people, esp. women, around.

But there are also lines laced with classic Peter Jackson feel-good. Sample:

“There is a lot of mystery left in the world, waiting to be discovered,
all for the price of an entry ticket.”
or
“Defeat is always momentary.”

Otherwise, but for the fact that Jack Black is too likeable for a director who crosses over to wrong camp and the overdone bonding between the girl and the ape, the movie is a rollercoaster ride into heaven, hell and back, paying tributes to the classics old and new including Jurassic Park, Titanic, Mackennas Gold among many.

Peter Jackson might be psycho. But he is God of spectacle cinema.

These are just off-hand thoughts typed in a hurry. Read a more structured review in the paper on Friday.

Share this:

  • Share
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
Like Loading...

Related

Posted In: Archives

Comments

Leave A Comment →
  1. Unknown's avatar Anonymous
    December 14, 2005 Reply

    dunno abt movie suds, but your ‘offhand thoughts typed in a hurry’ was awesome! very incisive! look forward to the review…as am not a sci-fi-movie person.
    shelob

  2. Unknown's avatar BK
    December 14, 2005 Reply

    Suder,
    Though I make it a point not read reviews before I watch a movie – I read first few lines of your review. I will read your full review after I watch it (hopefully this weekend). I am sure it will be great…
    -BK

  3. Unknown's avatar BK
    December 14, 2005 Reply

    Hey: forgot to ask…hows you movie coming along? having recently discovered your blogs (don’t remember how) I didn’t have enough time to read all of them..just curious….
    -BK

  4. Unknown's avatar BK
    December 14, 2005 Reply

    …me again…ne’er mind..found that blog – BK

  5. Unknown's avatar rapunzel
    December 15, 2005 Reply

    somehow i dont think i could sit and watch a movie with a huge animal (it is an animal, aint it??) and titled king kong :-/

    watched cleopatra yesterday.*drool*@richard burton.very pixellated version of de movie though.never gonna pick up dvds with 4 movies on them.

  6. Unknown's avatar rapunzel
    December 15, 2005 Reply

    on 2nd thoughts, i suppose i would watch the movie if i was really vetti :p or had awesome company.hmmmmm!or i had to review it and was getting a free ticket 😐

  7. Unknown's avatar Suderman
    December 15, 2005 Reply

    shelob:
    the “structured” one however doesnt seem to have this sort of a flow cuz the space available is limited on paper. anyways, i ll post it tomorrow n u can see the difference.

    bk:
    thanks man!

    rapunzel:
    king kong aint sci-fiction… its a simple larger than life monster story gloriously told.

  8. Unknown's avatar Raja
    December 16, 2005 Reply

    oi Suderdude,

    this one really does rock.

    blew me away.

    But I liked the fact that the monkey came in after 70 minutes.

  9. Unknown's avatar Suderman
    December 16, 2005 Reply

    raja:
    ur review blew me away…
    good one man!
    my official review appeared today.
    and good to see ya here.

  10. Unknown's avatar rapunzel
    December 16, 2005 Reply

    when did i say sci-fi??:-/

  11. Unknown's avatar Suderman
    December 16, 2005 Reply

    rapunzel:
    that was meant for shelob!
    sorry! πŸ™‚

  12. Unknown's avatar Suderman
    December 16, 2005 Reply

    rapunzel:
    did ya say awesome company? u just gotta ask for it! πŸ˜‰

  13. Unknown's avatar rapunzel
    December 22, 2005 Reply

    oh cool! get me awesome company santa!and it had better be REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLYYYYYY awesome:-D

Leave a reply to rapunzel Cancel reply

  • Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Join 480 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • MADRAS INK.
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d